Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Patch\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Patch\s*$/: 49 ]

Total 49 documents matching your query.

1. Patch (score: 1): Author: oluap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 13:12:07 -0300 (BRT); How can I patch official 2.4.6 kernel; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00107.html (7,042 bytes)
2. Re: Patch (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 21:29:36 -0500; You'll have to wait, the CVS tree is at 2.4.6-pre9 currently, and the 2.4.6 merge is not trivial for XFS. The CVS tree will probably get to 2.4.6 (and 2.4.7-pre1) tomorrow, hopefully we can get a sna; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00114.html (7,837 bytes)
3. Re: Patch (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 07:38:37 +0200 (CEST); CVS is -pre9 based but I think 2.4.6 should be forthcoming soon. It will take a few days. Cheers Seth; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00120.html (7,705 bytes)
4. Re: Patch (score: 1): Author: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 15:43:25 +1000; CVS was 2.4.6 for about 2 hours, it is now 2.4.7-pre1 and heading for 2.4.7-pre2 very soon.; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00121.html (8,144 bytes)
5. Re: Patch (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 08:22:48 +0200 (CEST); ye, flippin gods! Is linus now gone mad and imitate Alan Cox in a sudden change of heart? The previous assumption was legal for the old release pattern of whole kernel releases. I guess tracking the; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00123.html (8,578 bytes)
6. Re: Patch (score: 1): Author: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 16:26:39 +1000; Linus is grabbing large chunks from the -ac tree to get the two in sync (or as much as is safe).; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00124.html (8,197 bytes)
7. Re: Patch (score: 1): Author: "D. Stimits" <stimits@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 03:23:19 -0600; Are tags issued as standard practice at each sync? E.G., is there any problem with naming a tag to get the 2.4.6-pre3-xfs or 2.4.6-xfs at any time, despite the fast changes? (what tag name scheme is; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00135.html (8,402 bytes)
8. Re: Patch (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 09:19:07 -0500; I'll have to look into this, CVS is pushed out automatically from our own internal source code management tools, and I'm not sure if the concept of a CVS tag can make it from one to the other - it ma; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00144.html (8,459 bytes)
9. Re: Patch (score: 1): Author: cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 10:19:13 -0500; If I had time to catch each release I would tag them but if the are going to go whizzing by so fast I don't have time to do the checkout and subsequent tag. If somebody has a census file at 2.4.6 sen; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00148.html (8,549 bytes)
10. Re: Patch (score: 1): Author: "D. Stimits" <stimits@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 12:54:34 -0600; A temporary workaround (which could actually work for quite a while) would be if a web page gave the time/date to use for date-based checkout. Even without explicit tags at each stage, if you know th; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00159.html (10,092 bytes)
11. Re: Patch (score: 1): Author: Nathan Straz <nstraz@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 14:04:13 -0500; You should be able to do this already. Each "TAKE" message already included the date and time of the TAKE (a.k.a. commit). Just pick a time after that and before the next sync with Linus and you shou; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00161.html (9,387 bytes)
12. Re: Patch (score: 1): Author: "D. Stimits" <stimits@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 13:23:03 -0600; Maybe this is already provided, but could the "TAKE" messages be made available via web page? Saving all the email is a bit of a problem; I, for one, recently lost all of my email due to a Netscape p; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00163.html (9,812 bytes)
13. Re: Patch (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 14:21:45 -0500; Already there, see the mailing list archives. -Eric; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00164.html (8,321 bytes)
14. Re: Patch (score: 1): Author: Nathan Straz <nstraz@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 14:37:27 -0500; http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/ml.html Or do you mean a page with just a summary of all the TAKE messages? -- Nate Straz nstraz@xxxxxxx sgi, inc http://www.sgi.com/ Linux Test Project http://ltp.sf.; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00167.html (9,264 bytes)
15. Re: Patch (score: 1): Author: "D. Stimits" <stimits@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 13:49:58 -0600; Yes, just TAKE messages. Basically a _small_ subset of messages. D. Stimits, stimits@xxxxxxxxxx; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00170.html (9,362 bytes)
16. Patch (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 13:12:07 -0300 (BRT); How can I patch official 2.4.6 kernel; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01398.html (7,042 bytes)
17. Re: Patch (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 21:29:36 -0500; You'll have to wait, the CVS tree is at 2.4.6-pre9 currently, and the 2.4.6 merge is not trivial for XFS. The CVS tree will probably get to 2.4.6 (and 2.4.7-pre1) tomorrow, hopefully we can get a sna; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01405.html (7,837 bytes)
18. Re: Patch (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 07:38:37 +0200 (CEST); CVS is -pre9 based but I think 2.4.6 should be forthcoming soon. It will take a few days. Cheers Seth; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01411.html (7,705 bytes)
19. Re: Patch (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 15:43:25 +1000; CVS was 2.4.6 for about 2 hours, it is now 2.4.7-pre1 and heading for 2.4.7-pre2 very soon.; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01412.html (8,144 bytes)
20. Re: Patch (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 08:22:48 +0200 (CEST); ye, flippin gods! Is linus now gone mad and imitate Alan Cox in a sudden change of heart? The previous assumption was legal for the old release pattern of whole kernel releases. I guess tracking the; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01414.html (8,578 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]