Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*PCP\s+for\s+x86

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*PCP\s+for\s+x86_64\s+\?\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. Re: PCP for x86_64 ? (score: 1): Author: Ken McDonell <kenmcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 12:42:16 +1100; Download the source from oss.sgi.com ... try to rebuild it ... send us patches/fixes ... try running the PCP QA (also available from oss.sgi.com) ... etc. I believe PCP is _in_ SLES9, and we've been; /archives/pcp/2005-01/msg00000.html (7,499 bytes)
2. Re: PCP for x86_64 ? (score: 1): Author: Olivier Tarnus <o.tarnus@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:01:44 +0100; Ken McDonell wrote: On Wed, 22 Dec 2004, Olivier Tarnus wrote: kenmcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: Thanks, Jan-Frode. It should come as no surprise that sgi engineers don't have access to x86_64 for pcp; /archives/pcp/2005-01/msg00001.html (11,293 bytes)
3. Re: PCP for x86_64 ? (score: 1): Author: Olivier Tarnus <o.tarnus@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:12:14 +0100; Ken McDonell wrote: On Wed, 22 Dec 2004, Olivier Tarnus wrote: kenmcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: Thanks, Jan-Frode. It should come as no surprise that sgi engineers don't have access to x86_64 for pcp; /archives/pcp/2005-01/msg00002.html (10,476 bytes)
4. Re: PCP for x86_64 ? (score: 1): Author: Ken McDonell <kenmcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 12:42:16 +1100; Download the source from oss.sgi.com ... try to rebuild it ... send us patches/fixes ... try running the PCP QA (also available from oss.sgi.com) ... etc. I believe PCP is _in_ SLES9, and we've been; /archives/pcp/2005-01/msg00003.html (7,551 bytes)
5. Re: PCP for x86_64 ? (score: 1): Author: Olivier Tarnus <o.tarnus@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:01:44 +0100; Thanks, Jan-Frode. It should come as no surprise that sgi engineers don't have access to x86_64 for pcp testing, so assistance from others is most appreciated. Tell me what could help you... Downloa; /archives/pcp/2005-01/msg00004.html (11,559 bytes)
6. Re: PCP for x86_64 ? (score: 1): Author: Olivier Tarnus <o.tarnus@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:12:14 +0100; Thanks, Jan-Frode. It should come as no surprise that sgi engineers don't have access to x86_64 for pcp testing, so assistance from others is most appreciated. Tell me what could help you... Downloa; /archives/pcp/2005-01/msg00005.html (10,819 bytes)
7. Re: PCP for x86_64 ? (score: 1): Author: Olivier Tarnus <o.tarnus@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 11:38:13 +0100; Hi, I have some problems to compile on Suse SLES9 on x86_64. Either trying to build via rpmb or by hand will get the same error: checking build system type... Invalid configuration `x86_64-unknown-li; /archives/pcp/2004-12/msg00001.html (9,048 bytes)
8. Re: PCP for x86_64 ? (score: 1): Author: Jan-Frode Myklebust <Jan-Frode.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 12:02:49 +0100; Change the top-level GNUmakefile to also specify the '--build' option to configure: config configure config.cache : configure.in rm -f config.cache autoconf ./configure --build=i386-unknown-linux-gnu; /archives/pcp/2004-12/msg00002.html (8,065 bytes)
9. Re: PCP for x86_64 ? (score: 1): Author: Martin Quinson <martin.quinson@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 12:24:45 +0100; It looks like an old config.sub. What is its timestamp (3rd line of the script) ? If it's more than 6-10 month old, try to get new versions of config.sub and config.guess (from the automake project).; /archives/pcp/2004-12/msg00003.html (10,032 bytes)
10. Re: PCP for x86_64 ? (score: 1): Author: Olivier Tarnus <o.tarnus@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 14:35:10 +0100; Thanks, This fixed my problem. Cheers. Olivier Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote: On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 11:38:13AM +0100, Olivier Tarnus wrote: Any suggestion? Change the top-level GNUmakefile to also spec; /archives/pcp/2004-12/msg00004.html (8,568 bytes)
11. Re: PCP for x86_64 ? (score: 1): Author: Olivier Tarnus <o.tarnus@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 14:37:00 +0100; You're right Martin... SLES 9.1 come with automake 1.8.3, and it seems that this is the source of my problems, but SuSE don't provide an update for automake, so i will use the workaround of Jan-Frode; /archives/pcp/2004-12/msg00005.html (10,412 bytes)
12. Re: PCP for x86_64 ? (score: 1): Author: kenmcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 07:40:05 +1100 (EST); Thanks, Jan-Frode. It should come as no surprise that sgi engineers don't have access to x86_64 for pcp testing, so assistance from others is most appreciated. On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Olivier Tarnus wro; /archives/pcp/2004-12/msg00006.html (9,348 bytes)
13. Re: PCP for x86_64 ? (score: 1): Author: Olivier Tarnus <o.tarnus@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 18:06:15 +0100; kenmcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: Thanks, Jan-Frode. It should come as no surprise that sgi engineers don't have access to x86_64 for pcp testing, so assistance from others is most appreciated. Tell me; /archives/pcp/2004-12/msg00007.html (9,814 bytes)
14. Re: PCP for x86_64 ? (score: 1): Author: Olivier Tarnus <o.tarnus@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 11:38:13 +0100; Hi, I have some problems to compile on Suse SLES9 on x86_64. Either trying to build via rpmb or by hand will get the same error: checking build system type... Invalid configuration `x86_64-unknown-li; /archives/pcp/2004-12/msg00009.html (8,838 bytes)
15. Re: PCP for x86_64 ? (score: 1): Author: Jan-Frode Myklebust <Jan-Frode.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 12:02:49 +0100; Change the top-level GNUmakefile to also specify the '--build' option to configure: config configure config.cache : configure.in rm -f config.cache autoconf ./configure --build=i386-unknown-linux-gnu; /archives/pcp/2004-12/msg00010.html (8,171 bytes)
16. Re: PCP for x86_64 ? (score: 1): Author: Martin Quinson <martin.quinson@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 12:24:45 +0100; It looks like an old config.sub. What is its timestamp (3rd line of the script) ? If it's more than 6-10 month old, try to get new versions of config.sub and config.guess (from the automake project).; /archives/pcp/2004-12/msg00011.html (10,138 bytes)
17. Re: PCP for x86_64 ? (score: 1): Author: Olivier Tarnus <o.tarnus@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 14:35:10 +0100; Thanks, This fixed my problem. Cheers. Olivier Any suggestion? Change the top-level GNUmakefile to also specify the '--build' option to configure: config configure config.cache : configure.in rm -f c; /archives/pcp/2004-12/msg00012.html (8,609 bytes)
18. Re: PCP for x86_64 ? (score: 1): Author: Olivier Tarnus <o.tarnus@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 14:37:00 +0100; You're right Martin... SLES 9.1 come with automake 1.8.3, and it seems that this is the source of my problems, but SuSE don't provide an update for automake, so i will use the workaround of Jan-Frode; /archives/pcp/2004-12/msg00013.html (10,141 bytes)
19. Re: PCP for x86_64 ? (score: 1): Author: kenmcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 07:40:05 +1100 (EST); Thanks, Jan-Frode. It should come as no surprise that sgi engineers don't have access to x86_64 for pcp testing, so assistance from others is most appreciated. Thanks, This fixed my problem. Cheers.; /archives/pcp/2004-12/msg00014.html (9,269 bytes)
20. Re: PCP for x86_64 ? (score: 1): Author: Olivier Tarnus <o.tarnus@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 18:06:15 +0100; Thanks, Jan-Frode. It should come as no surprise that sgi engineers don't have access to x86_64 for pcp testing, so assistance from others is most appreciated. Tell me what could help you... My only; /archives/pcp/2004-12/msg00015.html (9,780 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]