Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Oracle\s+install\s+\-\-\s+fixed\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Oracle\s+install\s+\-\-\s+fixed\?\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

1. e: 1.0.2a anaconda hiccup (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 18:07:05 -0800; Does anyone know if whatever was causing Oracle not to install correctly on an XFS partition has been fixed? If not, is there a developer willing to work with me on getting it fixed? I really don't l; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00245.html (7,964 bytes)
2. (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 20:43:26 -0600 (CST); Any info on how it fails? I remember this from many months ago... I don't think we made any progress, since we don't have an Oracle for Linux license in this group - is there a demo or something that; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00246.html (8,327 bytes)
3. messes up file attributes (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 18:42:41 -0800; You can download a copy of Oracle 8.1.7 from otn.oracle.com -- you do have to sign away your life of course but it's a full version. If I remember correctly, the error given is something like "A misc; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00248.html (8,943 bytes)
4. Oracle install -- fixed? (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: 08 Jan 2002 15:02:18 -0600; Is it possible that Oracle would be willing to work with you on a temporary license to do the installation with and verify a bug or do testing to track down the issue? It would seem like a mutually b; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00249.html (9,068 bytes)
5. xfsdump assertion failure (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 08:10:08 +0100; from mobile.sauter-bc.com (unknown [10.1.6.21]) by basel1.sauter-bc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD22857306; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 08:10:08 +0100 (CET) Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx Organization: Sauter AG, Ba; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00256.html (9,633 bytes)
6. Oracle install -- fixed? (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 15:23:13 +0800; What problem ? Oracle version ? We're running Oracle 9i on linux with XFS now.... No any problem during Oracle install (only a binutils problem with "-z defs" during making Oracle client library....); /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00257.html (8,776 bytes)
7. Oracle install -- fixed? (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 08:26:20 +0100; Hi Adam, what error do you get? I have Oracle (8.1.7) installed on an XFS partition on at least three boxes and never had any problems. Is the problem with the installation or somewhere else? Adam; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00258.html (8,707 bytes)
8. as Re: GRUB + LVM + XFS?) (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 04:41:08 -0700; Perhaps it is mixing up the problem where the Oracle 8i does not like 2.4 kernels (regardless of being xfs or any other). See: http://www.zx81.org.uk/computing/oracle/oracle-howto/redhat7.html It inv; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00266.html (8,960 bytes)
9. ow what this error means? (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: 09 Jan 2002 12:21:35 -0500; Err, huh? I have Oracle 8i running on several Linux boxen that are all XFS with no problems. (They must've worked because I wasn't aware there was an issue. Chance are, they'll all break now. ;) -- -; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00270.html (9,422 bytes)
10. anaconda hiccup (score: 1): Author: " <mkp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 18:07:05 -0800; Does anyone know if whatever was causing Oracle not to install correctly on an XFS partition has been fixed? If not, is there a developer willing to work with me on getting it fixed? I really don't l; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01174.html (7,964 bytes)
11. .2a anaconda hiccup (score: 1): Author: .a30af8@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 20:43:26 -0600 (CST); Any info on how it fails? I remember this from many months ago... I don't think we made any progress, since we don't have an Oracle for Linux license in this group - is there a demo or something that; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01175.html (8,327 bytes)
12. ixed? (score: 1): Author: Dolphay <tbd@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 18:42:41 -0800; You can download a copy of Oracle 8.1.7 from otn.oracle.com -- you do have to sign away your life of course but it's a full version. If I remember correctly, the error given is something like "A misc; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01177.html (8,943 bytes)
13. ixed? (score: 1): Author: .517f80@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 08 Jan 2002 15:02:18 -0600; Is it possible that Oracle would be willing to work with you on a temporary license to do the installation with and verify a bug or do testing to track down the issue? It would seem like a mutually b; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01178.html (9,068 bytes)
14. ! (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 08:10:08 +0100; from mobile.sauter-bc.com (unknown [10.1.6.21]) by basel1.sauter-bc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD22857306; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 08:10:08 +0100 (CET) Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx Organization: Sauter AG, Ba; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01185.html (9,633 bytes)
15. error means? (score: 1): Author: ter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 15:23:13 +0800; What problem ? Oracle version ? We're running Oracle 9i on linux with XFS now.... No any problem during Oracle install (only a binutils problem with "-z defs" during making Oracle client library....); /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01186.html (8,776 bytes)
16. rtion failure (score: 1): Author: etter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 08:26:20 +0100; Hi Adam, what error do you get? I have Oracle (8.1.7) installed on an XFS partition on at least three boxes and never had any problems. Is the problem with the installation or somewhere else? Adam; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01187.html (8,707 bytes)
17. inal : XFS_REPAIR ;-) (score: 1): Author: oye <nic@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 04:41:08 -0700; Perhaps it is mixing up the problem where the Oracle 8i does not like 2.4 kernels (regardless of being xfs or any other). See: http://www.zx81.org.uk/computing/oracle/oracle-howto/redhat7.html It inv; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01195.html (8,960 bytes)
18. able) (score: 1): Author: e Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: 09 Jan 2002 12:21:35 -0500; Err, huh? I have Oracle 8i running on several Linux boxen that are all XFS with no problems. (They must've worked because I wasn't aware there was an issue. Chance are, they'll all break now. ;) -- -; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01199.html (9,422 bytes)
19. Oracle install -- fixed? (score: 1): Author: "Adam McKenna" <adam-dated-1010974025.a30af8@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 18:07:05 -0800; Does anyone know if whatever was causing Oracle not to install correctly on an XFS partition has been fixed? If not, is there a developer willing to work with me on getting it fixed? I really don't l; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg02103.html (7,979 bytes)
20. Re: Oracle install -- fixed? (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 20:43:26 -0600 (CST); Any info on how it fails? I remember this from many months ago... I don't think we made any progress, since we don't have an Oracle for Linux license in this group - is there a demo or something that; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg02104.html (8,356 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]