Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Optimize\s+RAID0\s+for\s+max\s+IOPS\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Optimize\s+RAID0\s+for\s+max\s+IOPS\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Optimize RAID0 for max IOPS? (score: 1): Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:25:02 -0500 (EST); So can anybody help answering these questions: - are there any special options when creating the RAID0 to make it perform faster for such a use case? - are there other tunables, any special MD / LV; /archives/xfs/2011-01/msg00337.html (8,614 bytes)
2. Re: Optimize RAID0 for max IOPS? (score: 1): Author: Wolfgang Denk <wd@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 21:48:27 +0100; Dear Justin Piszcz, Thanks a lot for the pointer. I will try this out. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirc; /archives/xfs/2011-01/msg00338.html (8,924 bytes)
3. Re: Optimize RAID0 for max IOPS? (score: 1): Author: Wolfgang Denk <wd@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 22:57:13 +0100; Dear Justin, For the record: I tested both the "delaylog" and "logbsize=262144" on two systems running Fedora 14 x86_64 (kernel version 2.6.35.10-74.fc14.x86_64). Test No. Mount options 1 rw,noatime; /archives/xfs/2011-01/msg00339.html (15,964 bytes)
4. Re: Optimize RAID0 for max IOPS? (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:03:14 +1100; Only 16 files? You need to test something that takes more than 5 milliseconds to run. Given that XFS can run at >20,000 creates/s for a single threaded sequential create like this, perhaps you should; /archives/xfs/2011-01/msg00341.html (11,310 bytes)
5. Re: Optimize RAID0 for max IOPS? (score: 1): Author: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 08:39:00 +0100; Le Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:03:14 +1100 vous écriviez: IIRC this is 16 thousands of files. Though this is not enough, I generally use 80 to 160 for tests. -- -- Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique <eflo; /archives/xfs/2011-01/msg00357.html (9,327 bytes)
6. Re: Optimize RAID0 for max IOPS? (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 19:36:43 +1100; [ As a small note - if you are going to comment on the results table from a previous message, please don't cut it from your response. Context is important. I pasted the relevant part back in so i can; /archives/xfs/2011-01/msg00358.html (11,403 bytes)
7. Re: Optimize RAID0 for max IOPS? (score: 1): Author: Wolfgang Denk <wd@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 13:45:09 +0100; Dear Dave Chinner, Right. [Any way to avoid these, btw?] I got side-tracked by the comments about the new (to me) delaylog mount option to xfs; as the results were not exactly as exp[ected I though i; /archives/xfs/2011-01/msg00377.html (10,731 bytes)
8. Re: Optimize RAID0 for max IOPS? (score: 1): Author: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 13:51:23 +0100; Le Tue, 25 Jan 2011 13:45:09 +0100 Wolfgang Denk <wd@xxxxxxx> écrivait: Easy enough, use the "nobarrier" mount option. -- -- Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --; /archives/xfs/2011-01/msg00378.html (10,246 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]