Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Open\s+hardware\s+wireless\s+cards\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Open\s+hardware\s+wireless\s+cards\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Open hardware wireless cards (score: 1): Author: mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Luis R. Rodriguez); Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:05:26 -0500; I'd also like to add... For those of you frustrated about our current wireless driver situation in open platforms -- I think we probably will have this trouble with most modern hardware for a while (; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00116.html (10,605 bytes)
2. Re: Open hardware wireless cards (score: 1): Author: lsorense@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Lennart Sorensen); Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:14:34 -0500; Being open doesn't mean you aren't violating some stupid patent. Software patents really are an incredibly stupid idea. Algorithms are pushing it. After all what does the algorithm do on it's own? Ca; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00117.html (9,551 bytes)
3. Re: Open hardware wireless cards (score: 1): Author: linux-os <linux-os@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:48:46 -0500 (EST); On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 lsorense@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 03:05:26PM -0500, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: I'd also like to add... For those of you frustrated about our current wireles; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00123.html (11,881 bytes)
4. Re: Open hardware wireless cards (score: 1): Author: lsorense@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Lennart Sorensen); Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:35:10 -0500; Well unfortunately I think you underestimate the cost of the serial eprom needed to do the load on an fpga or pld or the like. According to our suppliers they are actually rather hard to get for some; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00125.html (11,108 bytes)
5. Open hardware wireless cards (score: 1): Author: mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Luis R. Rodriguez); Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:05:26 -0500; I'd also like to add... For those of you frustrated about our current wireless driver situation in open platforms -- I think we probably will have this trouble with most modern hardware for a while (; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01606.html (10,662 bytes)
6. Re: Open hardware wireless cards (score: 1): Author: lsorense@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Lennart Sorensen); Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:14:34 -0500; Being open doesn't mean you aren't violating some stupid patent. Software patents really are an incredibly stupid idea. Algorithms are pushing it. After all what does the algorithm do on it's own? Ca; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01607.html (9,666 bytes)
7. Re: Open hardware wireless cards (score: 1): Author: linux-os <linux-os@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:48:46 -0500 (EST); For those of you frustrated about our current wireless driver situation in open platforms -- I think we probably will have this trouble with most modern hardware for a while (graphics cards, wireless; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01613.html (11,716 bytes)
8. Re: Open hardware wireless cards (score: 1): Author: lsorense@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Lennart Sorensen); Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:35:10 -0500; Well unfortunately I think you underestimate the cost of the serial eprom needed to do the load on an fpga or pld or the like. According to our suppliers they are actually rather hard to get for some; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01615.html (11,306 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]