Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Oops\s+\-\s+XFS\s+mount\s+after\s+replacing\s+wrong\s+RAID5\s+drive\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Oops - XFS mount after replacing wrong RAID5 drive (score: 1)
Author: Andrew Klaassen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 10:35:21 -0500
I think I may have just replaced the wrong drive after a SW RAID5 drive failure. And then I mounted the XFS filesystem read-write. (Doh!) Can I put the old probably-good drive back into the array and
/archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00079.html (8,105 bytes)

2. Re: Oops - XFS mount after replacing wrong RAID5 drive (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 05 Nov 2001 09:37:16 -0600
It will have replayed its log - and that information is now gone, so it is a little hard to say what state the filesystem is really in now. mount -o ro,norecovery Even a readonly mount without the no
/archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00081.html (9,155 bytes)

3. Re: Oops - XFS mount after replacing wrong RAID5 drive (score: 1)
Author: Andrew Klaassen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 11:22:50 -0500
So... mount it ro,norecovery, then run xfs_repair -n? Or just mount it ro,norecovery and try to grab the info we absolutely need? How much is it likely to have written while replaying the log? (There
/archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00087.html (10,116 bytes)

4. Re: Oops - XFS mount after replacing wrong RAID5 drive (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 05 Nov 2001 11:21:02 -0600
I was assuming you had replaced the wrong drive and remounted the filesystem, at which point recovery would have run. Once the log is updated then recovery will not run again - although if you switch
/archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00091.html (11,629 bytes)

5. Re: Oops - XFS mount after replacing wrong RAID5 drive (score: 1)
Author: Andrew Klaassen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 13:01:15 -0500
Unfortunately, there was an unclean unmount the second time, too. Here's the full sordid sequence of events: - hdp giving errors (SectorIdNotFound). - hdn fails (dma_status=0x00, or something like th
/archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00093.html (10,988 bytes)

6. RE: Q.. (score: 1)
Author: Andrew Klaassen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 14:15:23 -0500
<snip> Steve Lord is good to me And so I thank Steve Lord For giving me the things I need Like XFS mounts that only read. Steve Lord is good to me. - to the tune of Johnny Appleseed ;) Well, things a
/archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00135.html (9,903 bytes)

7. om cvs? (score: 1)
Author: x>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 10:35:21 -0500
u
/archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00812.html (8,105 bytes)

8. ronment (score: 1)
Author: x>
Date: 05 Nov 2001 09:37:16 -0600
o
/archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00814.html (9,155 bytes)

9. th XFS? (score: 1)
Author: x>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 11:22:50 -0500
p
/archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00820.html (10,116 bytes)

10. or code (score: 1)
Author: x>
Date: 05 Nov 2001 11:21:02 -0600
-
/archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00824.html (11,629 bytes)

11. d Hangs (score: 1)
Author: x>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 13:01:15 -0500
e
/archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00826.html (10,988 bytes)

12. Re: Q.. (score: 1)
Author: x>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 14:15:23 -0500
.
/archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00868.html (9,903 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu