Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*One\-way\s+Gigabit\s+Ethernet\s+TCP\s+performance\s+with\s+Jumbo\s+frames\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*One\-way\s+Gigabit\s+Ethernet\s+TCP\s+performance\s+with\s+Jumbo\s+frames\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. One-way Gigabit Ethernet TCP performance with Jumbo frames (score: 1): Author: Steffen Persvold <sp@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 14:06:41 +0100 (CET); Hi all, Lately I've been testing out two Gigabit Ethernet adapters on Pentium 4 Xeon platforms; onboard Intel 82544GC (e1000 driver) and onboard Broadcom BCM5701 (tg3 driver), and I'm experiencing so; /archives/netdev/2003-01/msg00003.html (9,291 bytes)
2. One-way Gigabit Ethernet TCP performance with Jumbo frames (score: 1): Author: Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 14:25:21 +0100; I've seen similar problems... and most of the times this seems due to incorrect tuned mitigation. Think of what happens if you don't have TX- interrupts enough to clean your TX-ring. Which means your; /archives/netdev/2003-01/msg00009.html (8,935 bytes)
3. One-way Gigabit Ethernet TCP performance with Jumbo frames (score: 1): Author: Steffen Persvold <sp@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 14:06:41 +0100 (CET); Hi all, Lately I've been testing out two Gigabit Ethernet adapters on Pentium 4 Xeon platforms; onboard Intel 82544GC (e1000 driver) and onboard Broadcom BCM5701 (tg3 driver), and I'm experiencing so; /archives/netdev/2003-01/msg00199.html (9,374 bytes)
4. One-way Gigabit Ethernet TCP performance with Jumbo frames (score: 1): Author: Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 14:25:21 +0100; I've seen similar problems... and most of the times this seems due to incorrect tuned mitigation. Think of what happens if you don't have TX- interrupts enough to clean your TX-ring. Which means your; /archives/netdev/2003-01/msg00205.html (9,084 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]