Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Old\s+XFS

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Old\s+XFS_GEOMETRY\s+change\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Old XFS_GEOMETRY change (score: 1): Author: Tim Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 12:32:03 +1000; Yep (Aside: I normally give a mount-point and not a device - xfsdump only works on mounted filesystems. I think if it has a device then it uses getmntent() to match with a mnt-pt). Both the on-disk a; /archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00000.html (7,122 bytes)
2. Re: Old XFS_GEOMETRY change (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 12:58:04 -0500; John Bartoszewski wrote: I think I've run into the problem listed here: http://oss.sgi.com/archives/linux-xfs/2002-09/msg00010.html Which is that the xfs file system was created with the old XFS_GEOM; /archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00013.html (8,026 bytes)
3. Re: Old XFS_GEOMETRY change (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 12:32:03 +1000; Yep (Aside: I normally give a mount-point and not a device - xfsdump only works on mounted filesystems. I think if it has a device then it uses getmntent() to match with a mnt-pt). Both the on-disk a; /archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00201.html (7,122 bytes)
4. Re: Old XFS_GEOMETRY change (score: 1): Author: en@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 12:58:04 -0500; John Bartoszewski wrote: I think I've run into the problem listed here: http://oss.sgi.com/archives/linux-xfs/2002-09/msg00010.html Which is that the xfs file system was created with the old XFS_GEOM; /archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00214.html (8,026 bytes)
5. Old XFS_GEOMETRY change (score: 1): Author: John Bartoszewski <johnb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 11:41:36 -0600; I think I've run into the problem listed here: http://oss.sgi.com/archives/linux-xfs/2002-09/msg00010.html Which is that the xfs file system was created with the old XFS_GEOMETRY ioctl and all the to; /archives/xfs/2005-04/msg00124.html (6,833 bytes)
6. Old XFS_GEOMETRY change (score: 1): Author: John Bartoszewski <johnb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 11:41:36 -0600; I think I've run into the problem listed here: http://oss.sgi.com/archives/linux-xfs/2002-09/msg00010.html Which is that the xfs file system was created with the old XFS_GEOMETRY ioctl and all the to; /archives/xfs/2005-04/msg00252.html (6,833 bytes)
7. Re: Old XFS_GEOMETRY change (score: 1): Author: Tim Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 12:32:03 +1000; Yep (Aside: I normally give a mount-point and not a device - xfsdump only works on mounted filesystems. I think if it has a device then it uses getmntent() to match with a mnt-pt). Both the on-disk a; /archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00402.html (7,279 bytes)
8. Re: Old XFS_GEOMETRY change (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 12:58:04 -0500; http://oss.sgi.com/archives/linux-xfs/2002-09/msg00010.html Which is that the xfs file system was created with the old XFS_GEOMETRY ioctl and all the tools I have use the new XFS_GEOMETRY ioctl. Has; /archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00415.html (7,964 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]