Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*New\s+thread\:\s+Manually\s+creating\s+the\s+2\.4\.4\s+XFS\s+tree\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*New\s+thread\:\s+Manually\s+creating\s+the\s+2\.4\.4\s+XFS\s+tree\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. New thread: Manually creating the 2.4.4 XFS tree (score: 1): Author: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 14:44:50 -0500 (CDT); I should've been more specific. I was under the assumption that you couldn't really use devfsd if devfs was not compiled into the kernel. Sorry for the confusion. What I really want to do is patch a; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00204.html (7,498 bytes)
2. Re: New thread: Manually creating the 2.4.4 XFS tree (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 22:44:34 +0200 (CEST); Just check out the linux-2.4-xfs tree from CVS. This one is currently based on 2.4.4. See the Getting XFS from CVS page. Patching 2.4.2 with XFS would be no problem, but patching this from 2.4.2 to 2; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00213.html (8,527 bytes)
3. Re: New thread: Manually creating the 2.4.4 XFS tree (score: 1): Author: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 15:49:54 -0500 (CDT); Yeah..I finally just figured well, I've seen posts saying that the linux-2.4-xfs was the devel, and the devel was upped to 2.4.4, so, that makes sense... I've gonethrough configuring, and I'll build; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00215.html (9,191 bytes)
4. Re: New thread: Manually creating the 2.4.4 XFS tree (score: 1): Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 17:10:49 -0400; this seem like a lot of work just to disable devfs where as % vi lilo.conf append="devfs=nomount" % lilo -v % reboot is quite simple. -- Russell Cattelan -- Digital Elves inc. -- Currently on loan to; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00219.html (9,724 bytes)
5. New thread: Manually creating the 2.4.4 XFS tree (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 14:44:50 -0500 (CDT); I should've been more specific. I was under the assumption that you couldn't really use devfsd if devfs was not compiled into the kernel. Sorry for the confusion. What I really want to do is patch a; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01568.html (7,498 bytes)
6. Re: New thread: Manually creating the 2.4.4 XFS tree (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 22:44:34 +0200 (CEST); Just check out the linux-2.4-xfs tree from CVS. This one is currently based on 2.4.4. See the Getting XFS from CVS page. Patching 2.4.2 with XFS would be no problem, but patching this from 2.4.2 to 2; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01577.html (8,527 bytes)
7. Re: New thread: Manually creating the 2.4.4 XFS tree (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 15:49:54 -0500 (CDT); Yeah..I finally just figured well, I've seen posts saying that the linux-2.4-xfs was the devel, and the devel was upped to 2.4.4, so, that makes sense... I've gonethrough configuring, and I'll build; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01579.html (9,191 bytes)
8. Re: New thread: Manually creating the 2.4.4 XFS tree (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 17:10:49 -0400; this seem like a lot of work just to disable devfs where as % vi lilo.conf append="devfs=nomount" % lilo -v % reboot is quite simple. -- Russell Cattelan -- Digital Elves inc. -- Currently on loan to; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01583.html (9,724 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]