Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*New\s+net\s+features\s+for\s+added\s+performance\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*New\s+net\s+features\s+for\s+added\s+performance\s*$/: 44 ]

Total 44 documents matching your query.

1. Re: New net features for added performance (score: 1): Author: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2000 00:19:15 +0000; And what? It makes allocation longer lived. Our MM should survive that just fine. -- Philips Velo 1: 1"x4"x8", 300gram, 60, 12MB, 40bogomips, linux, mutt, details at http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/; /archives/netdev/2001-03/msg00004.html (8,535 bytes)
2. Re: New net features for added performance (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 21:41:07 +0100; It's better for the MM if you relocate regularly. This way it can recover from fragmentation. A zone allocator like slab can only help against fragmentation when all the objects have roughtly similar; /archives/netdev/2001-03/msg00005.html (8,890 bytes)
3. Re: New net features for added performance (score: 1): Author: Jes Sorensen <jes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 01 Mar 2001 22:06:16 +0100; I already tried this with the AceNIC GigE driver some time ago, and after Ingo came up with a per-CPU slab patch the gain was gone. I am not sure the complexity is worth it. Jes; /archives/netdev/2001-03/msg00006.html (8,656 bytes)
4. Re: New net features for added performance (score: 1): Author: Jes Sorensen <jes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 04 Mar 2001 00:32:25 +0100; You need to define performance increase here. TX interrupt coalescing can still be a win in the systems load department. Jes; /archives/netdev/2001-03/msg00011.html (8,200 bytes)
5. Re: New net features for added performance (score: 1): Author: Jes Sorensen <jes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 12 Mar 2001 16:08:47 +0100; You may want to look at how I did this in the acenic driver. If the water mark goes below a certain level I schedule the tasklet, if it gets below an urgent watermark I do the allocation in the inte; /archives/netdev/2001-03/msg00125.html (8,581 bytes)
6. P receive stack (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 18:25:16 -0500; e; /archives/netdev/2001-02/msg00196.html (11,036 bytes)
7. ded performance (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 01:12:11 +0100; t; /archives/netdev/2001-02/msg00197.html (11,455 bytes)
8. ded performance (score: 1): Author: zik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 01:16:40 +0100; l; /archives/netdev/2001-02/msg00198.html (10,080 bytes)
9. ded performance (score: 1): Author: di Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 21:32:59 -0500; i; /archives/netdev/2001-02/msg00199.html (9,291 bytes)
10. ded performance (score: 1): Author: k@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 18:38:12 -0800 (PST); m; /archives/netdev/2001-02/msg00200.html (12,557 bytes)
11. ded performance (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 16:23:57 +1300; "; /archives/netdev/2001-02/msg00201.html (10,255 bytes)
12. zerocopy BETA 3 (score: 1): Author: x>; Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 23:01:27 +1100; n; /archives/netdev/2001-02/msg00204.html (12,823 bytes)
13. ded performance (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 13:22:49 +0100; _; /archives/netdev/2001-02/msg00205.html (11,030 bytes)
14. ded performance (score: 1): Author: rner Almesberger <Werner.Almesberger@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 13:41:56 +0100; g; /archives/netdev/2001-02/msg00206.html (10,448 bytes)
15. ded performance (score: 1): Author: rner Almesberger <Werner.Almesberger@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 13:08:50 +0000; p; /archives/netdev/2001-02/msg00207.html (11,165 bytes)
16. ded performance (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 02:57:36 +1300; t; /archives/netdev/2001-02/msg00208.html (10,342 bytes)
17. ded performance (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 10:11:50 -0500; t; /archives/netdev/2001-02/msg00209.html (10,563 bytes)
18. ded performance (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 21:59:23 +0300 (MSK); y; /archives/netdev/2001-02/msg00210.html (9,870 bytes)
19. ailed assertion (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 15:46:16 -0800 (PST); x; /archives/netdev/2001-02/msg00219.html (11,088 bytes)
20. g on ip.h stuff (score: 1): Author: xxx>; Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 19:07:11 -0500; r; /archives/netdev/2001-02/msg00221.html (9,763 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]