Ah, that may well be it. yeah, the rpm needs to set its own config options since the centos kernel has no xfs config. (Sorry, I just haven't had time to look into it yet) - but I bet you're right tha
Author: James Pearson <james-p@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 17:04:29 +0100
That's odd. You have the module on the server, exporting an xfs filesystem, and you're getting permission denied on the client? Yep. And rmmod'ing the updated XFS module and insmod'ing the older modu
Ah, that may well be it. yeah, the rpm needs to set its own config options since the centos kernel has no xfs config. (Sorry, I just haven't had time to look into it yet) - but I bet you're right tha
Author: James Pearson <james-p@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 17:04:29 +0100
That's odd. You have the module on the server, exporting an xfs filesystem, and you're getting permission denied on the client? Yep. And rmmod'ing the updated XFS module and insmod'ing the older modu
Has anyone had any luck with getting NFS exports to work with these updated modules? I'm not having any luck, and just getting "Permission denied" errors when trying to mount an NFS exported filesys
On 19 Jul 2007, at 16:15, Eric Sandeen wrote: That's odd. You have the module on the server, exporting an xfs filesystem, and you're getting permission denied on the client? Yep. And rmmod'ing the up
On 21 Jul 2007, at 15:58, Eric Sandeen wrote: Interesting - what are the exact versions of "updated" and "older" that you are using? I'll look at the diff... The updated one is the one from here http
Has anyone had any luck with getting NFS exports to work with these updated modules? I'm not having any luck, and just getting "Permission denied" errors when trying to mount an NFS exported filesys
On 19 Jul 2007, at 16:15, Eric Sandeen wrote: That's odd. You have the module on the server, exporting an xfs filesystem, and you're getting permission denied on the client? Yep. And rmmod'ing the up
On 21 Jul 2007, at 15:58, Eric Sandeen wrote: Interesting - what are the exact versions of "updated" and "older" that you are using? I'll look at the diff... The updated one is the one from here http
Author: "Geir A. Myrestrand" <geir.myrestrand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 12:25:05 -0500
Eric Sandeen wrote: http://sandeen.net/rhel4_xfs/kernel-module-xfs-2.6.9-42.0.2.EL-0.2-1.src.rpm rpmbuild --rebuild --target i686 kernel-module-xfs-2.6.9-42.0.2.EL-0.2-1.src.rpm will build against th
Author: "Geir A. Myrestrand" <geir.myrestrand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 13:17:32 -0500
Eric Sandeen wrote: Geir A. Myrestrand wrote: However, I run into issues with xfs_freeze as it often locks up when I try to freeze a file system where there is I/O activity. Sometimes it happen on th
Author: "Geir A. Myrestrand" <geir.myrestrand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 13:19:43 -0500
Eric Sandeen wrote: Did you have this problem on the previous version? Not sure if this occur with the older XFS modules, because I haven't tested it. -- Geir A. Myrestrand
Author: "Geir A. Myrestrand" <geir.myrestrand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 15:51:32 -0500
Eric Sandeen wrote: Geir A. Myrestrand wrote: However, I run into issues with xfs_freeze as it often locks up when I try to freeze a file system where there is I/O activity. Sometimes it happen on th
Does it happen with mainline (current) kernels? This is ringing some distant bells, something to do with an atomic_inc being in the wrong spot in [_]xfs_trans_alloc ... or maybe a wrong call to xfs_t