Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Network\s+oops\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Network\s+oops\s*$/: 38 ]

Total 38 documents matching your query.

1. Network oops (score: 1): Author: george anzinger <george@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2002 10:31:14 -0700; Is this sort of thing expected when the NIC is out of poop? <4>eth1: card reports no resources. <4>KERNEL: assertion ((int)tcp_packets_in_flight(tp) >= 0) failed at tcp_input.c(956):tcp_sacktag_write; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00022.html (10,064 bytes)
2. Re: Network oops (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2002 21:31:50 -0700 (PDT); No mention of what kernel version, what patches applied, etc. so we cannot help you.; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00024.html (8,198 bytes)
3. Re: Network oops (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2002 21:32:24 -0700 (PDT); Also we need to know what network driver, if preemption is being used (being from mvista I assume you are using preemption, and if so make sure you have the preemption networking patches applied).; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00025.html (9,010 bytes)
4. Re: Network oops (score: 1): Author: george anzinger <george@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2002 21:48:15 -0700; Sorry bout that. It is a 2.4.17 kernel and the test is to verify that we have the preempt code right. The question at hand is if this is a likely preempt problem or just a pure overload. The stress o; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00027.html (9,342 bytes)
5. Re: Network oops (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2002 22:06:21 -0700 (PDT); From: george anzinger <george@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2002 21:48:15 -0700 I would expect that the network code would recover from this sort of thing, so we are looking for a preempt issue at th; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00028.html (8,893 bytes)
6. Re: Network oops (score: 1): Author: george anzinger <george@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 01:11:01 -0700; Uh, are you saying there is a set of network patches? If so, where might they be found? And yes, we are testing preemption, trying to wring out the "last" bug :) (Could you be referring to the patche; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00031.html (10,919 bytes)
7. Re: Network oops (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 01:31:10 -0700 (PDT); Uh, are you saying there is a set of network patches? If so, where might they be found? And yes, we are testing preemption, trying to wring out the "last" bug :) (Could you be referring to the patch; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00032.html (9,553 bytes)
8. Re: Network oops (score: 1): Author: george anzinger <george@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 07:12:04 -0700; Ah, yes. Those are the ones I have found sofar. Robert Love would be the submitter. It would apear there is at least one more hole :( Thus the query. -- George Anzinger george@xxxxxxxxxx High-res-tim; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00037.html (10,342 bytes)
9. Re: Network oops (score: 1): Author: "Mala Anand" <manand@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 09:42:10 -0500; -- I have see this problem with this NIC. You need to increase the number of buffers in the RX and TX ring in eepro100.c file. Right now it is set to 32, change it to 256 or 128 this error will go a; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00038.html (10,537 bytes)
10. Re: Network oops (score: 1): Author: Donald Becker <becker@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 21:35:23 -0400 (EDT); Changing the Tx queue size or number of Rx skbuffs waiting to be filled will not fix a problem. It might mask some problem e.g. a temporary shortage of skbuffs, but it doesn't fix anything. -- Donald; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00050.html (8,931 bytes)
11. Re: Network oops (score: 1): Author: "Mala Anand" <manand@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 11:58:30 -0500; The problem what I saw was resource problem and as a result I had packet drops. The input rate was high and the driver didn't have enough resources to handle. It was a pure resource problem. -- Rega; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00064.html (8,697 bytes)
12. Re: Network oops (score: 1): Author: Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 10:42:40 -0700 (PDT); I think the problem Donald Becker is referring to is the fact that it oopses when out of resources, (or whatever), and that is not a graceful and acceptable thing. Adding resources pushes the problem; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00066.html (9,413 bytes)
13. Re: Network oops (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 10:19:42 -0700; We need help from someone who knows the network code. I have tried to give all the relevant information below. The machine that last failed can still be examined with kgdb to answer any further quest; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00130.html (17,670 bytes)
14. Re: Network oops (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 17:38:05 -0700 (PDT); I don't understand, you've completely turned the preemption model of the kernel upside down and you want _US_ to debug this for you? This is a lot of work, work I personally don't have time for. It r; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00132.html (9,021 bytes)
15. Re: Network oops (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 07:16:24 -0700; You could look at it this way :) On the other hand, I prefer to think of the linux community as a group of folks working on making one of the best OSs on the planet even better. Its adoption by more; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00133.html (10,703 bytes)
16. Re: Network oops (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 07:17:20 -0700 (PDT); [ BTW please start using newlines in your emails, instead of 1,000 character monstrosities lacking them. Thanks ] On the other hand, I prefer to think of the linux community as a group of folks worki; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00134.html (9,683 bytes)
17. Re: Network oops (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 08:12:29 -0700; Sure. I am trying to find something that works with patches as well as text. Still looking I guess. Can we agree to disagree :) I said they would be welcome, not that you have to reply... -- George A; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00135.html (10,792 bytes)
18. Re: Network oops (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 02:55:51 +0200; I would look at the driver, especially races in its skb handling. -Andi; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00137.html (9,746 bytes)
19. Re: Network oops (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 12:56:31 -0700; We finally found the problem. I want to thank the folks who gave any thought and/or feedback to us, particularly Alexey and David. For what its worth we tracked it down to the kernel memory allocatio; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00149.html (10,244 bytes)
20. Network oops (score: 1): Author: george anzinger <george@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2002 10:31:14 -0700; Is this sort of thing expected when the NIC is out of poop? <4>eth1: card reports no resources. <4>KERNEL: assertion ((int)tcp_packets_in_flight(tp) >= 0) failed at tcp_input.c(956):tcp_sacktag_write; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00173.html (10,166 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]