Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Network\s+card\s+driver\s+problem\s+$znb\.o\/tulip$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Network\s+card\s+driver\s+problem\s+$znb\.o\/tulip$\s*$/: 50 ]

Total 50 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Network card driver problem (znb.o/tulip) (score: 1): Author: Kosta Todorovic <kostodo@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 09:45:30 +0400; I'm not too concerned with backward compatibility. I see silicom-usa provide both a Broadcom and Intel based chipsets. Is there any reason in particular that you reccomended Broadcom? And can standar; /archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00080.html (16,511 bytes)
2. Re: Network card driver problem (znb.o/tulip) (score: 1): Author: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 22:53:53 -0700; Kosta Todorovic wrote: I'm not too concerned with backward compatibility. I see silicom-usa provide both a Broadcom and Intel based chipsets. Is there any reason in particular that you reccomended Br; /archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00081.html (9,993 bytes)
3. Re: Network card driver problem (znb.o/tulip) (score: 1): Author: Kosta Todorovic <kostodo@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 09:58:44 +0400; So intel gigE nics use standard tulip linux drivers that come shipped with a vanilla kernel?; /archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00082.html (10,620 bytes)
4. Re: Network card driver problem (znb.o/tulip) (score: 1): Author: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 23:25:52 -0700; Kosta Todorovic wrote: So intel gigE nics use standard tulip linux drivers that come shipped with a vanilla kernel? No..forget about tulip. It uses standard e1000 driver shipped with vanilla kernel.; /archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00083.html (9,318 bytes)
5. Re: Network card driver problem (znb.o/tulip) (score: 1): Author: Polyakov <johnpol@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 12:02:49 +0400; Whats the best 4-port NIC currently available? I'm interested in purchasing 10 4-port NICs as a replacement for my current cards. I am looking for 10/100Mbps and a good driver for linux (2.4.x and 2.; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00738.html (11,054 bytes)
6. Re: Network card driver problem (znb.o/tulip) (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 10:14:00 -0700; Kosta Todorovic wrote: Whats the best 4-port NIC currently available? I'm interested in purchasing 10 4-port NICs as a replacement for my current cards. I am looking for 10/100Mbps and a good driver; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00757.html (12,446 bytes)
7. Re: Network card driver problem (znb.o/tulip) (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 09:25:49 +0400; 2 more questions: 1) Is there anything special I will need to compile in terms of the linux kernel for 64-bit PCI bus mode (PCI-X) ? (Currently I'm using kernel 2.4.x but that is because my current c; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00812.html (13,912 bytes)
8. Re: Network card driver problem (znb.o/tulip) (score: 1): Author:; Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 09:07:23 -0700; Kosta Todorovic wrote: 2 more questions: 1) Is there anything special I will need to compile in terms of the linux kernel for 64-bit PCI bus mode (PCI-X) ? (Currently I'm using kernel 2.4.x but that; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00828.html (14,743 bytes)
9. net/core/skbuff.c:91 crash (score: 1): Author: <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 05:51:31 +0000; My company has recently purchased several ZNYX ZX274 network cards. These cards are Four Channel, 10/100 PCI Adapters. They use Intel chipsets. Unfortunately there exists no drivers for linux amd64 a; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00729.html (10,448 bytes)
10. river problem (znb.o/tulip) (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:00:23 -0800; Kosta Todorovic wrote: My company has recently purchased several ZNYX ZX274 network cards. These cards are Four Channel, 10/100 PCI Adapters. They use Intel chipsets. Unfortunately there exists no dr; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00730.html (10,950 bytes)
11. river problem (znb.o/tulip) (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 06:08:43 +0000; Its not really an option to exchange network cards. Any other suggestions?; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00731.html (11,911 bytes)
12. panics with tulip (score: 1): Author: iss <andy.furniss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 23:33:51 -0600; Suck or not, it would be good to have these adapters working. Some people might not be willing to spend $400 on a new adapter. Hopefully some generous soul would be willing to spend their valuable ti; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01098.html (11,603 bytes)
13. ucible panics with tulip (score: 1): Author: ason@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 14:29:14 +0400; Problem is that all the adapters are currently in use in 32bit mode. It was my only solution. I'm hoping that will not be a permanent thing. Im just a little lost as in to what I should do. I've been; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01104.html (10,640 bytes)
14. tulip (score: 1): Author: rt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 07:57:27 -0600; I have a tulip adapter laying around somewhere. I can give that a try and verify that tulip works on a 64bit system (assuming it hasn't been already tried). The ZNXY website provides the driver sourc; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01107.html (10,543 bytes)
15. G in 2.6.12-rc1 triggered by ill behaved CD-ROM drive (score: 1): Author: urniss <andy.furniss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 16:23:54 +0100; Jon Mason <jdmason@xxxxxxxxxx> : There are no sources for the rlk.O file and the driver suffers a bit from the usual out-of-tree hal braindamage. Both can probably be worked around but I would not ma; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01109.html (10,456 bytes)
16. rion/S2io 10GbE Adapters (score: 1): Author: cel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 20 Mar 2005 09:05:46 -0500; I have those 4 port cards(quiet a few i may add and used in all my experiments on NAPI with 10/100 etc for the last few eons) and they work just fine with standard linux driver on my 32 bit hardware; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01123.html (11,759 bytes)
17. e: [22/*] [NETFILTER] Use correct IPsec MTU in TCPMSS (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 23:02:53 +0400; Using the standard tulip driver in 64bit mode loads the cards but they just dont seem to work. When i tested with "mii-tool -w" it keep saying "Autonegotiation Failed".; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01137.html (12,861 bytes)
18. problem (znb.o/tulip) (score: 1): Author: rick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: 20 Mar 2005 14:09:51 -0500; I dont think mii-tool will tell you the truth with these cards. Like i was saying earlier - they use SYM PHYs. Does it work on 32 bit machines? I am assuming when you say "64 bit" you mean the archit; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01139.html (11,032 bytes)
19. e: [22/*] [NETFILTER] Use correct IPsec MTU in TCPMSS (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 23:18:14 +0400; Either way, no traffic moved across them when I tried. Yes it does work on 32bit machines, but with the actual znb.o driver thats supplied by ZNXY. And yes i am refering to architecture and NOT pci; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01141.html (11,530 bytes)
20. imple actions (score: 1): Author: a Todorovic <kostodo@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: 20 Mar 2005 14:29:04 -0500; Probably the stats display is your best bet for debugging. It works just fine for me with 32 bit machine with the standard tulip driver(sorry dont have 64 bit - too poor); does it work for you? i.e i; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01144.html (11,740 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]