Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Need\s+some\s+help\s+with\s+cause\s+of\s+Oops\s+in\s+XFS\s+1\.2\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Need\s+some\s+help\s+with\s+cause\s+of\s+Oops\s+in\s+XFS\s+1\.2\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Need some help with cause of Oops in XFS 1.2 (score: 1): Author: Steven Dake <sdake@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 11:23:45 -0700; XFS Developers, Ok here is what I have done: I have a tree that already had XFS 1.1 (with a bunch of other stuff) included. I hand applied the XFS 1.2 on top of XFS 1.1 patch and everything seems to; /archives/xfs/2003-03/msg00336.html (13,557 bytes)
2. Re: Need some help with cause of Oops in XFS 1.2 (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 19:38:38 +0000; Are you using the preempt patch or other obscure core kernel changes?; /archives/xfs/2003-03/msg00341.html (9,008 bytes)
3. Re: Need some help with cause of Oops in XFS 1.2 (score: 1): Author: Steven Dake <sdake@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 13:19:21 -0700; the preempt patch is applied (heavily modified, as I said :) however, I have preemption turned off. The other significant difference is the use of the real time scheduler (which is also turned off).; /archives/xfs/2003-03/msg00342.html (10,023 bytes)
4. Re: Need some help with cause of Oops in XFS 1.2 (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 20:32:29 +0000; Can you please try to reproduce it with a plain 1.2 XFS tree? It's hard to debug some widly different tree we don't even have source to.; /archives/xfs/2003-03/msg00344.html (9,468 bytes)
5. Re: Need some help with cause of Oops in XFS 1.2 (score: 1): Author: Steven Dake <sdake@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 13:32:50 -0700; I suspect the issue wouldn't present itself with a vanilla 2.4.18 + xfs1.2 tree as it would have already been caught... And unfortunately I can't apply to a plain vanilla tree, it must go into this p; /archives/xfs/2003-03/msg00345.html (10,657 bytes)
6. Re: Need some help with cause of Oops in XFS 1.2 (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 20:54:29 +0000; Maybe get some consultant that knows Linux filesystem code to fix it for your company? I wouldn't expect too much help on a heavily patched tree that's not publically available.; /archives/xfs/2003-03/msg00346.html (10,315 bytes)
7. Re: Need some help with cause of Oops in XFS 1.2 (score: 1): Author: Steven Dake <sdake@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 14:02:28 -0700; I understand filesystem code quite well, and the particular problem (if you would have read the oops) is in the memory management layer. But thanks for your advice. -steve Christoph Hellwig wrote: On; /archives/xfs/2003-03/msg00347.html (10,909 bytes)
8. Re: Need some help with cause of Oops in XFS 1.2 (score: 1): Author: Rusell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxx>; Date: 25 Mar 2003 18:50:51 -0600; If possible get kbd into your tree. Then open a bug and attach what ever backtraces you can get. bta is a good place to start. That might shed some light on the situation, but without wading through; /archives/xfs/2003-03/msg00353.html (9,591 bytes)
9. Need some help with cause of Oops in XFS 1.2 (score: 1): Author: Steven Dake <sdake@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 11:23:45 -0700; XFS Developers, Ok here is what I have done: I have a tree that already had XFS 1.1 (with a bunch of other stuff) included. I hand applied the XFS 1.2 on top of XFS 1.1 patch and everything seems to; /archives/xfs/2003-03/msg00805.html (13,557 bytes)
10. Re: Need some help with cause of Oops in XFS 1.2 (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 19:38:38 +0000; Are you using the preempt patch or other obscure core kernel changes?; /archives/xfs/2003-03/msg00810.html (9,008 bytes)
11. Re: Need some help with cause of Oops in XFS 1.2 (score: 1): Author: Steven Dake <sdake@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 13:19:21 -0700; the preempt patch is applied (heavily modified, as I said :) however, I have preemption turned off. The other significant difference is the use of the real time scheduler (which is also turned off).; /archives/xfs/2003-03/msg00811.html (10,023 bytes)
12. Re: Need some help with cause of Oops in XFS 1.2 (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 20:32:29 +0000; Can you please try to reproduce it with a plain 1.2 XFS tree? It's hard to debug some widly different tree we don't even have source to.; /archives/xfs/2003-03/msg00813.html (9,468 bytes)
13. Re: Need some help with cause of Oops in XFS 1.2 (score: 1): Author: Steven Dake <sdake@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 13:32:50 -0700; I suspect the issue wouldn't present itself with a vanilla 2.4.18 + xfs1.2 tree as it would have already been caught... And unfortunately I can't apply to a plain vanilla tree, it must go into this p; /archives/xfs/2003-03/msg00814.html (10,657 bytes)
14. Re: Need some help with cause of Oops in XFS 1.2 (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 20:54:29 +0000; Maybe get some consultant that knows Linux filesystem code to fix it for your company? I wouldn't expect too much help on a heavily patched tree that's not publically available.; /archives/xfs/2003-03/msg00815.html (10,315 bytes)
15. Re: Need some help with cause of Oops in XFS 1.2 (score: 1): Author: Steven Dake <sdake@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 14:02:28 -0700; I understand filesystem code quite well, and the particular problem (if you would have read the oops) is in the memory management layer. But thanks for your advice. -steve Christoph Hellwig wrote: On; /archives/xfs/2003-03/msg00816.html (10,909 bytes)
16. Re: Need some help with cause of Oops in XFS 1.2 (score: 1): Author: Rusell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxx>; Date: 25 Mar 2003 18:50:51 -0600; If possible get kbd into your tree. Then open a bug and attach what ever backtraces you can get. bta is a good place to start. That might shed some light on the situation, but without wading through; /archives/xfs/2003-03/msg00822.html (9,591 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]