Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*NVidia\s+\&\s+XFS\s*$/: 31 ]

Total 31 documents matching your query.

1. re11 (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 09:22:50 -0800 (PST)
Greetings all, I found that I only had this problem when I built the virtual frame buffer support into the kernel. I don't know if that helps, but after removing the virtual frame buffer module (for
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00304.html (8,372 bytes)

2. ge corruption in XFS-HEAD (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: 10 Jan 2002 12:20:10 -0600
You'll have to ask NVidia about it, there's no way to debug it on this -Eric -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs sandeen@xxxxxxx SGI, Inc.
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00306.html (9,801 bytes)

3. & LVM to coexist happily (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 15:47:22 -0500
In the immortal words of Eric Sandeen (sandeen@xxxxxxx): This is actually a FAQ in the docs for nvidia's drivers. Short form: why would you _expect_ using two completely different drivers to control
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00314.html (8,713 bytes)

4. to coexist happily (score: 1)
Author: an" <sheep@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 09:22:50 -0800 (PST)
Greetings all, I found that I only had this problem when I built the virtual frame buffer support into the kernel. I don't know if that helps, but after removing the virtual frame buffer module (for
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01233.html (8,372 bytes)

5. -pre11 (score: 1)
Author: rr <spstarr@xxxxxxxx>
Date: 10 Jan 2002 12:20:10 -0600
You'll have to ask NVidia about it, there's no way to debug it on this -Eric -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs sandeen@xxxxxxx SGI, Inc.
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01235.html (9,801 bytes)

6. nux-lvm] Re: Unable to get XFS, ext3, reiserfs & LVM to coexist happily (score: 1)
Author: adilger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 15:47:22 -0500
In the immortal words of Eric Sandeen (sandeen@xxxxxxx): This is actually a FAQ in the docs for nvidia's drivers. Short form: why would you _expect_ using two completely different drivers to control
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01243.html (8,713 bytes)

7. NVidia & XFS (score: 1)
Author: Alp ATICI <atici@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 15:46:11 -0500 (EST)
I wonder whether anyone had the same problem with me. I have a GeForce 3 video card and it works perfectly on a usual 7.2 system with the binaries provided in nvidia.com. However now I'm using a cust
/archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00100.html (8,626 bytes)

8. Re: NVidia & XFS (score: 1)
Author: Bryan-TheBS-Smith <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 15:58:19 -0500
Actually, I have XFS + nVidia working great on Linux, but get total hangs on Windows. It's clearly an AMD/nVidia AGPgart issue and they won't even respond for Windows support! ;-PPP -- TheBS -- Bryan
/archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00101.html (8,691 bytes)

9. Re: NVidia & XFS (score: 1)
Author: Theo Van Dinter <felicity@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 16:03:00 -0500
It works fine for me as well. I have a GeForce2, and everything works great. I found that after upgrading from RH 7.1 to 7.2, I had to reinstall both the NVIDIA_kernel and GLX packages, and then redo
/archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00102.html (9,083 bytes)

10. Re: NVidia & XFS (score: 1)
Author: Bryan-TheBS-Smith <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 16:06:03 -0500
Of course, the kernel changed. You have to at least re-install the "NVIDIA_kernel" package. ??? Not me ??? -- TheBS -- Bryan "TheBS" Smith mailto:b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx chat:thebs413 Engineer AbsoluteVal
/archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00103.html (9,089 bytes)

11. Re: NVidia & XFS (score: 1)
Author: Alp ATICI <atici@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 16:10:05 -0500 (EST)
I'm using RedHat 7.1 with XFS 1.0.1 from the iso's provided. Only thing differs is that I have a gcc 3.0. Do you think it might be sth about Red Hat kernel or installation of gcc? I read the nvidia
/archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00104.html (8,607 bytes)

12. Re: NVidia & XFS (score: 1)
Author: Theo Van Dinter <felicity@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 16:18:34 -0500
Yeah, I'd been doing that. Then with the update to RH 7.2, Mesa and the XFree packages got upgraded so I needed to redo GLX. (that and I upgraded kernel to 1541 ...) It was the XFree upgrade that see
/archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00105.html (9,158 bytes)

13. Re: NVidia & XFS (score: 1)
Author: Theo Van Dinter <felicity@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 16:20:43 -0500
Take a look at: ftp://209.213.197.10/XFree86_40/1.0-1541/ Specifically: ftp://209.213.197.10/XFree86_40/1.0-1541/NVIDIA_GLX-1.0-1541.i386.rpm ftp://209.213.197.10/XFree86_40/1.0-1541/NVIDIA_kernel-1.
/archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00106.html (9,042 bytes)

14. Re: NVidia & XFS (score: 1)
Author: Bryan-TheBS-Smith <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 16:23:55 -0500
I got symbol errors when I built NVIDIA_KERNEL against a different modversions.h header than SGI did. I found my problem lay in the fact that mrproper wipes out modversions.h in /usr/src/linux and if
/archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00107.html (8,987 bytes)

15. Re: NVidia & XFS (score: 1)
Author: Theo Van Dinter <felicity@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 16:28:06 -0500
Oh, and make sure you have kernel-source installed, otherwise the build has problems. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "Security is a process, not a patch" - Bruce Schneier
/archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00108.html (8,567 bytes)

16. Re: NVidia & XFS (score: 1)
Author: "D. Stimits" <stimits@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 14:42:02 -0700
Something that will almost always bite you in the ass is if you use a different version of gcc for the kernel than what you use on the modules. If your kernel is being compiled with kgcc, but nvidia
/archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00109.html (9,498 bytes)

17. RE: NVidia & XFS (score: 1)
Author: "Gonyou, Austin" <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 16:36:22 -0600
I use GCC 3.0.1 to compile all my kernels on the machine I described. -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-796-9023 email: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
/archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00111.html (9,270 bytes)

18. of 4 GB (score: 1)
Author: x>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 15:46:11 -0500 (EST)
i
/archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00833.html (8,626 bytes)

19. a & XFS (score: 1)
Author: x>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 15:58:19 -0500
t
/archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00834.html (8,691 bytes)

20. a & XFS (score: 1)
Author: x>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 16:03:00 -0500
n
/archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00835.html (9,083 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu