Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*NULL\s+dereference\s+on\s+mount\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*NULL\s+dereference\s+on\s+mount\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. Re: NULL dereference on mount (score: 1): Author: Daniel Moore <dxm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 12:44:43 +1000; => > Anyway, there it is. Anyone have any thoughts? => => Yup, I've been looking into this. => What are you doing to blow the 128k cache? To test other changes I've been making, I've been doing nasty; /archives/xfs/2000-05/msg00005.html (7,744 bytes)
2. Re: NULL dereference on mount (score: 1): Author: Daniel Moore <dxm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 12:44:43 +1000; => > Anyway, there it is. Anyone have any thoughts? => => Yup, I've been looking into this. => What are you doing to blow the 128k cache? To test other changes I've been making, I've been doing nasty; /archives/xfs/2000-05/msg00277.html (7,744 bytes)
3. NULL dereference on mount (score: 1): Author: Daniel Moore <dxm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 15:19:52 +1000; I've just been trying to track down a problem I've started experiencing recently. I've finally worked out whats going on, and I think it's a known problem, but here's the symptoms just in-case anyone; /archives/xfs/2000-04/msg00253.html (8,198 bytes)
4. Re: NULL dereference on mount (score: 1): Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 02:14:14 -0500; Yup, I've been looking into this. What are you doing to blow the 128k cache? A "clean" file-system shouldn't be in reovery code, you must have crashed the system at some point. kmalloc failures are a; /archives/xfs/2000-04/msg00254.html (9,291 bytes)
5. Re: NULL dereference on mount (score: 1): Author: Bernd Markgraf <markgraf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 10:23:27 +0200 (MET DST); as i wrote before i also experienced this problem. i just tried a ~90gb large xfs ;-) (my box has 128mb ram and 512mb swap - this should be plenty...) i already sent a oops trace i got trying to mou; /archives/xfs/2000-04/msg00255.html (8,430 bytes)
6. Re: NULL dereference on mount (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 08:44:39 -0500; yes it should be plenty, could you run mkfs again on your disk and send me the output - I want to see how it sizes things, that should give us some clues. Also cat /proc/slabinfo and /proc/meminfo b; /archives/xfs/2000-04/msg00256.html (8,833 bytes)
7. Re: NULL dereference on mount (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 08:54:59 -0500; Another thing to try would be to mount the filesystem on a clean boot - i.e. mkfs, reboot, then mount. I just want to isolate things as much as possible here - I suspect this will still fail. Steve; /archives/xfs/2000-04/msg00257.html (8,366 bytes)
8. Re: NULL dereference on mount (score: 1): Author: Bernd Markgraf <markgraf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 17:46:09 +0200 (MET DST); i just grabbed the latest sources from cvs and boom it worked. so however changed the code during the last 2 days fixed the oops on mount. i just tested xfs on a 330gb partition and it worked nicely; /archives/xfs/2000-04/msg00263.html (8,145 bytes)
9. Re: NULL dereference on mount (score: 1): Author: Dan Koren <dankoren@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 09:49:20 -0700 (PDT); ^^^^^ Where did you manage to find a 330gb partition? Inside an Easter egg? I'd like to get one too! :) dk __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send online invitations wi; /archives/xfs/2000-04/msg00264.html (8,005 bytes)
10. Re: NULL dereference on mount (score: 1): Author: cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 12:30:31 -0500; Well since you never sent in a kbd back trace we are not really sure where your problem occured. We think it might have something to do with kmem_realloc stomping on memory it shouldn't have.; /archives/xfs/2000-04/msg00265.html (9,280 bytes)
11. NULL dereference on mount (score: 1): Author: Daniel Moore <dxm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 15:19:52 +1000; I've just been trying to track down a problem I've started experiencing recently. I've finally worked out whats going on, and I think it's a known problem, but here's the symptoms just in-case anyone; /archives/xfs/2000-04/msg00529.html (8,198 bytes)
12. Re: NULL dereference on mount (score: 1): Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 02:14:14 -0500; Yup, I've been looking into this. What are you doing to blow the 128k cache? A "clean" file-system shouldn't be in reovery code, you must have crashed the system at some point. kmalloc failures are a; /archives/xfs/2000-04/msg00530.html (9,291 bytes)
13. Re: NULL dereference on mount (score: 1): Author: Bernd Markgraf <markgraf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 10:23:27 +0200 (MET DST); as i wrote before i also experienced this problem. i just tried a ~90gb large xfs ;-) (my box has 128mb ram and 512mb swap - this should be plenty...) i already sent a oops trace i got trying to mou; /archives/xfs/2000-04/msg00531.html (8,430 bytes)
14. Re: NULL dereference on mount (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 08:44:39 -0500; yes it should be plenty, could you run mkfs again on your disk and send me the output - I want to see how it sizes things, that should give us some clues. Also cat /proc/slabinfo and /proc/meminfo b; /archives/xfs/2000-04/msg00532.html (8,833 bytes)
15. Re: NULL dereference on mount (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 08:54:59 -0500; Another thing to try would be to mount the filesystem on a clean boot - i.e. mkfs, reboot, then mount. I just want to isolate things as much as possible here - I suspect this will still fail. Steve; /archives/xfs/2000-04/msg00533.html (8,366 bytes)
16. Re: NULL dereference on mount (score: 1): Author: Bernd Markgraf <markgraf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 17:46:09 +0200 (MET DST); i just grabbed the latest sources from cvs and boom it worked. so however changed the code during the last 2 days fixed the oops on mount. i just tested xfs on a 330gb partition and it worked nicely; /archives/xfs/2000-04/msg00539.html (8,145 bytes)
17. Re: NULL dereference on mount (score: 1): Author: Dan Koren <dankoren@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 09:49:20 -0700 (PDT); ^^^^^ Where did you manage to find a 330gb partition? Inside an Easter egg? I'd like to get one too! :) dk __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send online invitations wi; /archives/xfs/2000-04/msg00540.html (8,005 bytes)
18. Re: NULL dereference on mount (score: 1): Author: cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 12:30:31 -0500; Well since you never sent in a kbd back trace we are not really sure where your problem occured. We think it might have something to do with kmem_realloc stomping on memory it shouldn't have.; /archives/xfs/2000-04/msg00541.html (9,280 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]