Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*NAPI\:\s+dev\.c\s+change\s+to\s+net_rx

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*NAPI\:\s+dev\.c\s+change\s+to\s+net_rx_action\s+algorithm\.\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. uestion (score: 1): Author: adi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 20:23:30 -0800; I tried making this change to dev.c in the net_rx_action method. So far, I have passed about 25 million packets and only dropped about 1.5k. This is with 4 interfaces tx + rx 8kpps (757 byte packets); /archives/netdev/2002-11/msg00085.html (10,169 bytes)
2. rors (score: 1): Author: x>; Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 23:32:02 -0500 (EST); The only thing i can think of is that if it was legal to flog people youd be on my list. And i would hope you dont enjoy it. Why do you like to put band-aids to things? Find the real cause of why you; /archives/netdev/2002-11/msg00086.html (11,250 bytes)
3. (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 20:55:17 -0800; jamal wrote: The only thing i can think of is that if it was legal to flog people youd be on my list. And i would hope you dont enjoy it. Why do you like to put band-aids to things? Find the real cau; /archives/netdev/2002-11/msg00087.html (9,629 bytes)
4. (score: 1): Author: x>; Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 23:58:07 -0500 (EST); No you are not. You are looking for something that will give you some quick fix given your current setup. Be systematic about and prove where things are wrong. I even made some suggestions to you a w; /archives/netdev/2002-11/msg00088.html (8,888 bytes)
5. (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 21:30:37 -0800; jamal wrote: On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Ben Greear wrote: I'm looking for the real cause. No you are not. You are looking for something that will give you some quick fix given your current setup. Guilty, an; /archives/netdev/2002-11/msg00089.html (12,495 bytes)
6. v.c change to net_rx_action algorithm. (score: 1): Author: mike obi" <ekointernationalbank@xxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2002 09:41:09 -0500 (EST); All, i am saying is that you should stop wildly pointing fingers at a million things and diagnose what the issue is then come up with a fix; So far, you have not. It was the rx ring then it is napi/D; /archives/netdev/2002-11/msg00091.html (8,045 bytes)
7. NAPI: dev.c change to net_rx_action algorithm. (score: 1): Author: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 20:23:30 -0800; I tried making this change to dev.c in the net_rx_action method. So far, I have passed about 25 million packets and only dropped about 1.5k. This is with 4 interfaces tx + rx 8kpps (757 byte packets); /archives/netdev/2002-11/msg00303.html (9,960 bytes)
8. Re: NAPI: dev.c change to net_rx_action algorithm. (score: 1): Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 23:32:02 -0500 (EST); The only thing i can think of is that if it was legal to flog people youd be on my list. And i would hope you dont enjoy it. Why do you like to put band-aids to things? Find the real cause of why you; /archives/netdev/2002-11/msg00304.html (11,319 bytes)
9. Re: NAPI: dev.c change to net_rx_action algorithm. (score: 1): Author: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 20:55:17 -0800; The only thing i can think of is that if it was legal to flog people youd be on my list. And i would hope you dont enjoy it. Why do you like to put band-aids to things? Find the real cause of why you; /archives/netdev/2002-11/msg00305.html (9,525 bytes)
10. Re: NAPI: dev.c change to net_rx_action algorithm. (score: 1): Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 23:58:07 -0500 (EST); No you are not. You are looking for something that will give you some quick fix given your current setup. Be systematic about and prove where things are wrong. I even made some suggestions to you a w; /archives/netdev/2002-11/msg00306.html (8,912 bytes)
11. Re: NAPI: dev.c change to net_rx_action algorithm. (score: 1): Author: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 21:30:37 -0800; On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Ben Greear wrote: I'm looking for the real cause. No you are not. You are looking for something that will give you some quick fix given your current setup. Guilty, and as soon as; /archives/netdev/2002-11/msg00307.html (12,332 bytes)
12. Re: NAPI: dev.c change to net_rx_action algorithm. (score: 1): Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2002 09:41:09 -0500 (EST); All, i am saying is that you should stop wildly pointing fingers at a million things and diagnose what the issue is then come up with a fix; So far, you have not. It was the rx ring then it is napi/D; /archives/netdev/2002-11/msg00309.html (8,069 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]