Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Memory\s+leak\s+in\s+2\.6\.11\-rc1\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Memory\s+leak\s+in\s+2\.6\.11\-rc1\?\s*$/: 72 ]

Total 72 documents matching your query.

21. ure pointers (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 15:34:49 +0000; o retreive any structure by casting; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01355.html (14,037 bytes)
22. p0 to become free (Re: ppp0 out of control) (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 08:57:02 -0800; is depends on your arch. --yoshfuji; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01360.html (11,800 bytes)
23. 0 and a WOL packet causes keventd going mad (score: 1): Author: ‰è—¤è‹±æ˜Ž <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 18:23:10 +0100; xxxxxxx> says: rmk@dyn-67:[bk]:<1030; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01363.html (12,128 bytes)
24. td going mad (score: 1): Author: x>; Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 18:26:29 +0100; running kernel 2.6.8.1 and the NIC i; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01364.html (12,785 bytes)
25. 2.6.11-rc1? (score: 1): Author: xxx>; Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 18:58:27 +0100; ents, does each fragment skb have a; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01365.html (13,418 bytes)
26. 2.6.11-rc1? (score: 1): Author: xxx>; Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 18:01:46 +0000; e have a list of fragments, does ea; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01366.html (12,656 bytes)
27. 2.6.11-rc1? (score: 1): Author: vid Härdeman <david@xxxxxxxx; Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 10:19:13 -0800; e have a list of fragments, does ea; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01367.html (10,916 bytes)
28. 2.6.11-rc1? (score: 1): Author: ck McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 18:45:07 +0000; g_list is not empty in all cases so; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01368.html (14,266 bytes)
29. -6 route shows incorrect route expiry times (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 18:48:36 -0800; _xmit() routines is the illegal sta; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01380.html (11,965 bytes)
30. 0 and a WOL packet causes keventd going mad (score: 1): Author: l <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:11:32 +1100; the assertion of PME while the system is up; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01388.html (10,576 bytes)
31. 0 and a WOL packet causes keventd going mad (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 13:45:59 +0900 (JST); 574; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01390.html (11,256 bytes)
32. 0 and a WOL packet causes keventd going mad (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 06:00:40 +0100; put.c 2005-01-25 09:40:10 +09:00 ++; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01392.html (11,305 bytes)
33. y leak in 2.6.11-rc1? (score: 1): Author: mab@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:16:36 +0900 (JST); xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:11:32 +1100), Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> says: Patrick McHardy <k; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01394.html (10,410 bytes)
34. fix proposal (score: 1): Author: fuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 21:11:50 -0800; xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> says: Patrick McHardy <k; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01395.html (10,053 bytes)
35. 2.6.11-rc1? (score: 1): Author: dma@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:40:52 +1100; n the end. That's all.; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01396.html (10,936 bytes)
36. 2.6.11-rc1? (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:42:52 +0900 (JST); rect and I'll add it into the tree.; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01397.html (10,954 bytes)
37. Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1? (score: 1): Author: Russell King <rmk+lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 20:03:15 +0000; I think I may be seeing something odd here, maybe a possible memory leak. The only problem I have is wondering whether I'm actually comparing like with like. Maybe some networking people can provide; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02513.html (13,089 bytes)
38. Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1? (score: 1): Author: Russell King <rmk+lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:48:53 +0000; FYI, today it looks like this: bash-2.05a# cat /proc/net/rt_cache | wc -l; grep ip_dst /proc/slabinfo 26 ip_dst_cache 820 1065 256 15 1 So the dst cache seems to have grown by 151 in 16 hours... I'll; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02541.html (12,382 bytes)
39. Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1? (score: 1): Author: Russell King <rmk+lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:32:07 +0000; Tonights update: 50 ip_dst_cache 1024 1245 256 15 1 As you can see, the dst cache is consistently growing by about 200 entries per day. Given this, I predict that the box will fall over due to "dst c; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02603.html (14,038 bytes)
40. Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1? (score: 1): Author: Russell King <rmk+lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 08:28:09 +0000; This mornings magic numbers are: 3 ip_dst_cache 1292 1485 256 15 1 Is no one interested in the fact that the DST cache is leaking and eventually takes out machines? I've had virtually zero interest i; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02695.html (13,023 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]