- 1. Re: Lock debugging noise or real problem? (score: 1)
- Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:10:17 -0500
- the explanation for xfs_fsr, at least, is the same as the last time you brought it up ;) http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/12/86 -Eric
- /archives/xfs/2008-08/msg00174.html (8,835 bytes)
- 2. Re: Lock debugging noise or real problem? (score: 1)
- Author: Linda Walsh <lkml@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:33:42 -0700
- Eric Sandeen wrote: the explanation for xfs_fsr, at least, is the same as the last time you brought it up ;) http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/12/86 -Eric -- Ah...Looks like the 1st xfs_fsr prob is the sam
- /archives/xfs/2008-08/msg00189.html (24,035 bytes)
- 3. Re: Lock debugging noise or real problem? (score: 1)
- Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 21:48:28 -0500
- http://www.google.com/search?q=xfs_fsr+dio_get_page+lockdep I haven't looked closely at #2 but there have been so many lockdep reports for xfs, and so many explanations of why they don't always get a
- /archives/xfs/2008-08/msg00190.html (10,163 bytes)
- 4. Re: Lock debugging noise or real problem? (score: 1)
- Author: Linda Walsh <lkml@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:35:07 -0700
- Eric Sandeen wrote: I haven't looked closely at #2 but there have been so many lockdep reports for xfs, and so many explanations of why they don't always get along, you'll probably be able to find so
- /archives/xfs/2008-08/msg00191.html (9,585 bytes)
- 5. Re: Lock debugging noise or real problem? (score: 1)
- Author: xx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:10:17 -0500
- the explanation for xfs_fsr, at least, is the same as the last time you brought it up ;) http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/12/86 -Eric
- /archives/xfs/2008-08/msg00622.html (8,835 bytes)
- 6. Re: Lock debugging noise or real problem? (score: 1)
- Author: xx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:33:42 -0700
- Eric Sandeen wrote: the explanation for xfs_fsr, at least, is the same as the last time you brought it up ;) http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/12/86 -Eric -- Ah...Looks like the 1st xfs_fsr prob is the sam
- /archives/xfs/2008-08/msg00637.html (24,035 bytes)
- 7. Re: Lock debugging noise or real problem? (score: 1)
- Author: xx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 21:48:28 -0500
- http://www.google.com/search?q=xfs_fsr+dio_get_page+lockdep I haven't looked closely at #2 but there have been so many lockdep reports for xfs, and so many explanations of why they don't always get a
- /archives/xfs/2008-08/msg00638.html (10,163 bytes)
- 8. Re: Lock debugging noise or real problem? (score: 1)
- Author: xx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:35:07 -0700
- Eric Sandeen wrote: I haven't looked closely at #2 but there have been so many lockdep reports for xfs, and so many explanations of why they don't always get along, you'll probably be able to find so
- /archives/xfs/2008-08/msg00639.html (9,585 bytes)
- 9. Re: Lock debugging noise or real problem? (score: 1)
- Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:10:17 -0500
- the explanation for xfs_fsr, at least, is the same as the last time you brought it up ;) http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/12/86 -Eric
- /archives/xfs/2008-08/msg01070.html (8,894 bytes)
- 10. Re: Lock debugging noise or real problem? (score: 1)
- Author: Linda Walsh <lkml@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:33:42 -0700
- Eric Sandeen wrote: the explanation for xfs_fsr, at least, is the same as the last time you brought it up ;) http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/12/86 -Eric -- Ah...Looks like the 1st xfs_fsr prob is the sam
- /archives/xfs/2008-08/msg01085.html (25,111 bytes)
- 11. Re: Lock debugging noise or real problem? (score: 1)
- Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 21:48:28 -0500
- http://www.google.com/search?q=xfs_fsr+dio_get_page+lockdep I haven't looked closely at #2 but there have been so many lockdep reports for xfs, and so many explanations of why they don't always get a
- /archives/xfs/2008-08/msg01086.html (10,302 bytes)
- 12. Re: Lock debugging noise or real problem? (score: 1)
- Author: Linda Walsh <lkml@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:35:07 -0700
- Eric Sandeen wrote: I haven't looked closely at #2 but there have been so many lockdep reports for xfs, and so many explanations of why they don't always get along, you'll probably be able to find so
- /archives/xfs/2008-08/msg01087.html (9,764 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu