Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Linux\s+router\s+performance\s+\(3c59x\)\s+\(fwd\)\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Linux router performance (3c59x) (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: tin" <andwes-8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 22:43:38 -0500 (EST)
I haven't heard from Jamal or Dave, so perhaps someone from this list has some wisdom to impart. Currently the box in question is running a 67% system load with ~40kpps. Here's the switch port stats
/archives/netdev/2003-03/msg00116.html (14,679 bytes)

2. Re: Linux router performance (3c59x) (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: lph Doncaster <ralph@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 20:48:08 -0800
Ralph Doncaster wrote: I haven't heard from Jamal or Dave, so perhaps someone from this list has some wisdom to impart. Currently the box in question is running a 67% system load with ~40kpps. Here's
/archives/netdev/2003-03/msg00117.html (9,379 bytes)

3. Re: Linux router performance (3c59x) (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: reear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 00:09:42 -0500 (EST)
[...] So I should just give up on Linux and go with FreeBSD? http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/polling/ No, but I did read through a bunch of the route-cache code and even with the dynamic hashtable si
/archives/netdev/2003-03/msg00118.html (9,708 bytes)

4. Re: Linux router performance (3c59x) (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: lph Doncaster <ralph@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 22:30:47 -0800
Ralph Doncaster wrote: On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Ben Greear wrote: Ralph Doncaster wrote: [...] Currently the box in question is running a 67% system load with ~40kpps. Here's the switch port stats that t
/archives/netdev/2003-03/msg00119.html (13,163 bytes)

5. Re: Linux router performance (3c59x) (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: reear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 10:54:48 +0100
Hello! First we do a lot of testing with routing path but have no experience with the hardware you have 3c59x or duron. In general it seems hard to extrapolate performance X1 % CPU at X2 pps. You don
/archives/netdev/2003-03/msg00120.html (9,887 bytes)

6. Re: Linux router performance (3c59x) (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: Ralph Doncaster <ralph@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 22:43:38 -0500 (EST)
I haven't heard from Jamal or Dave, so perhaps someone from this list has some wisdom to impart. Currently the box in question is running a 67% system load with ~40kpps. Here's the switch port stats
/archives/netdev/2003-03/msg00371.html (14,709 bytes)

7. Re: Linux router performance (3c59x) (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 20:48:08 -0800
5 minute input rate 36143000 bits/sec, 8914 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 54338000 bits/sec, 10722 packets/sec - 5 minute input rate 50585000 bits/sec, 12445 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 34326
/archives/netdev/2003-03/msg00372.html (9,274 bytes)

8. Re: Linux router performance (3c59x) (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: Ralph Doncaster <ralph@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 00:09:42 -0500 (EST)
[...] So I should just give up on Linux and go with FreeBSD? http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/polling/ No, but I did read through a bunch of the route-cache code and even with the dynamic hashtable si
/archives/netdev/2003-03/msg00373.html (9,808 bytes)

9. Re: Linux router performance (3c59x) (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 22:30:47 -0800
[...] Currently the box in question is running a 67% system load with ~40kpps. Here's the switch port stats that the 2 3c905cx cards are plugged into: 5 minute input rate 36143000 bits/sec, 8914 pack
/archives/netdev/2003-03/msg00374.html (13,060 bytes)

10. Re: Linux router performance (3c59x) (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 10:54:48 +0100
Hello! First we do a lot of testing with routing path but have no experience with the hardware you have 3c59x or duron. In general it seems hard to extrapolate performance X1 % CPU at X2 pps. You don
/archives/netdev/2003-03/msg00375.html (9,984 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu