Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Linux\s+2\.4\.4\s+\+\s+xfs\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Linux 2.4.4 + xfs (score: 1)
Author: "linux" <dahouet@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2001 15:37:08 +0200
i had a kernel 2.4.3 and i tried to compile it with xfs support in kernel and it failed ! i had gcc 2.95 , i installed kgcc with egcs 1.1.2 and failed again. i didn't want to downgrade my kernel so
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00375.html (7,417 bytes)

2. Re: Linux 2.4.4 + xfs (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2001 10:22:53 -0500
Could you provide some information about how these failed, so that we can fix them if it's a real problem? Unknown - 2.4.4 is largely untested at this point. Root XFS filesystems should be fine, many
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00378.html (8,082 bytes)

3. Re: Linux 2.4.4 + xfs (score: 1)
Author: "linux" <dahouet@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2001 17:40:43 +0200
Le 07/05/2001 à 10:22 Eric Sandeen a écrit : you can see a few posts in the list archive. do you want to do some test with my config ? ok i'm about to try to migrate my server today. thanks @++ nico
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00379.html (8,113 bytes)

4. Re: Linux 2.4.4 + xfs (score: 1)
Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2001 12:10:10 -0400
Since I've manage to make some stupid mistakess when generating patches in the past, I make sure to test the patches before I put them on oss. I tested the CVS patch and it does work. how did you try
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00380.html (8,429 bytes)

5. Re: Linux 2.4.4 + xfs (score: 1)
Author: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 14:29:52 -0500 (CDT)
I'm using the 2.4.4 source tree from SGI's cvs. I must say, it is quite nice. I've still got some kinda slow sluggish thing happening to my system, Don't know if that's nautilus causing that or if it
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00390.html (7,955 bytes)

6. Re: Linux 2.4.4 + xfs (score: 1)
Author: "linux" <dahouet@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2001 22:01:03 +0200
i'm about to finish my migration. (20gb of system) and i boot from a spare partition with a xfs root filesystem and there's no first problem. the annoying thing is that when we will change version o
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00392.html (8,451 bytes)

7. Re: Linux 2.4.4 + xfs (score: 1)
Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 22:14:25 +0200 (CEST)
For server use it seems to hold up reasonably well for something which is not thoroughly tested ;) The test machine at work holded up nicely when doing some light testing. Samba seemed a bit sluggish
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00393.html (8,634 bytes)

8. Linux 2.4.4 + xfs (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2001 17:13:58 -0500
Just back from a weeks vacation, slogging through my email backlog, I notice a fair demand for a 2.4.4 xfs patch out there, and that people are using the development tree. Looking at what happened t
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00400.html (7,548 bytes)

9. Linux 2.4.4 + xfs (score: 1)
Author: ller@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2001 15:37:08 +0200
i had a kernel 2.4.3 and i tried to compile it with xfs support in kernel and it failed ! i had gcc 2.95 , i installed kgcc with egcs 1.1.2 and failed again. i didn't want to downgrade my kernel so
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01739.html (7,417 bytes)

10. Re: Linux 2.4.4 + xfs (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2001 10:22:53 -0500
Could you provide some information about how these failed, so that we can fix them if it's a real problem? Unknown - 2.4.4 is largely untested at this point. Root XFS filesystems should be fine, many
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01742.html (8,082 bytes)

11. Re: Linux 2.4.4 + xfs (score: 1)
Author: een@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2001 17:40:43 +0200
Le 07/05/2001 à 10:22 Eric Sandeen a écrit : you can see a few posts in the list archive. do you want to do some test with my config ? ok i'm about to try to migrate my server today. thanks @++ nico
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01743.html (8,113 bytes)

12. Re: Linux 2.4.4 + xfs (score: 1)
Author: uet@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2001 12:10:10 -0400
Since I've manage to make some stupid mistakess when generating patches in the past, I make sure to test the patches before I put them on oss. I tested the CVS patch and it does work. how did you try
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01744.html (8,429 bytes)

13. Re: Linux 2.4.4 + xfs (score: 1)
Author: een@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 14:29:52 -0500 (CDT)
I'm using the 2.4.4 source tree from SGI's cvs. I must say, it is quite nice. I've still got some kinda slow sluggish thing happening to my system, Don't know if that's nautilus causing that or if it
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01754.html (7,955 bytes)

14. Re: Linux 2.4.4 + xfs (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2001 22:01:03 +0200
i'm about to finish my migration. (20gb of system) and i boot from a spare partition with a xfs root filesystem and there's no first problem. the annoying thing is that when we will change version o
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01756.html (8,451 bytes)

15. Re: Linux 2.4.4 + xfs (score: 1)
Author: uet@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 22:14:25 +0200 (CEST)
For server use it seems to hold up reasonably well for something which is not thoroughly tested ;) The test machine at work holded up nicely when doing some light testing. Samba seemed a bit sluggish
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01757.html (8,634 bytes)

16. Linux 2.4.4 + xfs (score: 1)
Author: n@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2001 17:13:58 -0500
Just back from a weeks vacation, slogging through my email backlog, I notice a fair demand for a 2.4.4 xfs patch out there, and that people are using the development tree. Looking at what happened t
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01764.html (7,548 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu