Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Level\s+One\s+LXT1001\s+GE\s+chip\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Level One LXT1001 GE chip (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 19:44:15 -0800
8-P~~~ Ok, I threw this together and I'll probably merge it upstream soon. (Jeff I'll take care of this and the bug tg3 fixes I worked on yesterday... this email is just a FYI) == drivers/net/tg3.c 1
/archives/netdev/2003-12/msg00072.html (49,914 bytes)

2. Level One LXT1001 GE chip (score: 1)
Author: avid Dillow <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 02:02:17 +0100
Months ago I sent a question to netdev to know if SMC TigerCard 1000 (SMC9462SX) was supported under LiNUX. Today I know that the answer is NO, officially. Maybe because it's little extended and it'
/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00543.html (8,748 bytes)

3. Re: Level One LXT1001 GE chip (score: 1)
Author: id Dillow <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 01:03:24 -0800
Looks mildly interesting, I might be inspired to cook up a fresh driver :)
/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00544.html (7,833 bytes)

4. Re: Level One LXT1001 GE chip (score: 1)
Author: fuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 12:20:21 +0100
Actually there is an old vendor driver for the lxt1001 (but it is quite ugly and will probably need some porting for 2.6 or even 2.4) I've been also slowly working on a new driver, but still nothing
/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00549.html (8,334 bytes)

5. Re: Level One LXT1001 GE chip (score: 1)
Author: vid S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 12:26:42 +0100
BTW I should add - the chipset is really dead. Intel has bought LevelOne and killed it. You are unlikely to be able to get any new cards for it. But it is an quite interesting architecture (with some
/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00550.html (9,002 bytes)

6. Re: Level One LXT1001 GE chip (score: 1)
Author: ana <felipe_alfaro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 27 Nov 2003 08:52:03 -0500
The reading of CSR32 equating to clearing it makes it a little pathetic. I like the fact that reading that register also disables interupts because that makes it NAPI friendly. If you are NAPIizing i
/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00554.html (9,525 bytes)

7. Re: Level One LXT1001 GE chip (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 16:22:54 +0100
I thought that you already got homework, tg3TsoFwText firmware ;-) -- HTML mails are going to trash automagically
/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00555.html (7,627 bytes)

8. Re: Level One LXT1001 GE chip (score: 1)
Author: ki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 02:14:39 +0100
Yep. I didn't attempt to NAPIize it though. Also it is still somewhat buggy. -Andi
/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00574.html (8,351 bytes)

9. Re: Level One LXT1001 GE chip (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 19:44:15 -0800
8-P~~~ Ok, I threw this together and I'll probably merge it upstream soon. (Jeff I'll take care of this and the bug tg3 fixes I worked on yesterday... this email is just a FYI) == drivers/net/tg3.c 1
/archives/netdev/2003-12/msg00471.html (50,133 bytes)

10. Level One LXT1001 GE chip (score: 1)
Author: Xose Vazquez Perez <xose@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 02:02:17 +0100
hi, Months ago I sent a question to netdev to know if SMC TigerCard 1000 (SMC9462SX) was supported under LiNUX. Today I know that the answer is NO, officially. Maybe because it's little extended and
/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg01156.html (8,793 bytes)

11. Re: Level One LXT1001 GE chip (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 01:03:24 -0800
Looks mildly interesting, I might be inspired to cook up a fresh driver :)
/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg01157.html (7,892 bytes)

12. Re: Level One LXT1001 GE chip (score: 1)
Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 12:20:21 +0100
Actually there is an old vendor driver for the lxt1001 (but it is quite ugly and will probably need some porting for 2.6 or even 2.4) I've been also slowly working on a new driver, but still nothing
/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg01162.html (8,445 bytes)

13. Re: Level One LXT1001 GE chip (score: 1)
Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 12:26:42 +0100
BTW I should add - the chipset is really dead. Intel has bought LevelOne and killed it. You are unlikely to be able to get any new cards for it. But it is an quite interesting architecture (with some
/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg01163.html (9,144 bytes)

14. Re: Level One LXT1001 GE chip (score: 1)
Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 27 Nov 2003 08:52:03 -0500
The reading of CSR32 equating to clearing it makes it a little pathetic. I like the fact that reading that register also disables interupts because that makes it NAPI friendly. If you are NAPIizing i
/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg01167.html (9,686 bytes)

15. Re: Level One LXT1001 GE chip (score: 1)
Author: Xose Vazquez Perez <xose@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 16:22:54 +0100
I thought that you already got homework, tg3TsoFwText firmware ;-) -- HTML mails are going to trash automagically
/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg01168.html (7,686 bytes)

16. Re: Level One LXT1001 GE chip (score: 1)
Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 02:14:39 +0100
Yep. I didn't attempt to NAPIize it though. Also it is still somewhat buggy. -Andi
/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg01187.html (8,540 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu