Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Kernel\s+2\.6\.22\-rc3\s+safe\s+to\s+migrate\s+to\?\s*$/: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

1. Kernel 2.6.22-rc3 safe to migrate to? (score: 1)
Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 17:24:58 -0400 (EDT)
Wondering as their were a lot of XFS related issues early on in development..? The 2.6.22-rc3 kernel has the core 2 duo coretemp patch by ruik which I want be running as long as 2.6.22-rc3 does not h
/archives/xfs/2007-06/msg00002.html (8,081 bytes)

2. Re: Kernel 2.6.22-rc3 safe to migrate to? (score: 1)
Author: Christian Kujau <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 22:59:01 +0100 (BST)
On Sat, 2 Jun 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote: Wondering as their were a lot of XFS related issues early on in development..? The 2.6.22-rc3 kernel has the core 2 duo coretemp patch by ruik which I want be
/archives/xfs/2007-06/msg00005.html (9,453 bytes)

3. Re: Kernel 2.6.22-rc3 safe to migrate to? (score: 1)
Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 18:09:30 -0400 (EDT)
On Sat, 2 Jun 2007, Christian Kujau wrote: On Sat, 2 Jun 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote: Wondering as their were a lot of XFS related issues early on in development..? The 2.6.22-rc3 kernel has the core 2
/archives/xfs/2007-06/msg00006.html (10,066 bytes)

4. Re: Kernel 2.6.22-rc3 safe to migrate to? (score: 1)
Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 18:27:05 -0400 (EDT)
Jun 2 18:23:23 p34 upsd[2225]: Can't connect to UPS [belkin] (newhidups-auto): No such file or directory Jun 2 18:24:23 p34 upsmon[2228]: Poll UPS [belkin@localhost] failed - Driver not connected Hmm
/archives/xfs/2007-06/msg00007.html (10,383 bytes)

5. Re: Kernel 2.6.22-rc3 safe to migrate to? (score: 1)
Author: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2007 15:54:09 -0700
XFS currently has a data-corrupting bug, where files which were appended by small amounts may lose their updates on umount - I see this corrupting hg repos. There's a patch which works for me, and is
/archives/xfs/2007-06/msg00009.html (9,236 bytes)

6. Re: Kernel 2.6.22-rc3 safe to migrate to? (score: 1)
Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 18:55:45 -0400 (EDT)
On Sat, 2 Jun 2007, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: Justin Piszcz wrote: Wondering as their were a lot of XFS related issues early on in development..? The 2.6.22-rc3 kernel has the core 2 duo coretemp pa
/archives/xfs/2007-06/msg00010.html (9,891 bytes)

7. Re: Kernel 2.6.22-rc3 safe to migrate to? (score: 1)
Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 20:27:22 -0400 (EDT)
On Sun, 3 Jun 2007, Christian Kujau wrote: On Sat, 2 Jun 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote: On Sat, 2 Jun 2007, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: XFS currently has a data-corrupting bug, where files which were appe
/archives/xfs/2007-06/msg00013.html (10,774 bytes)

8. Re: Kernel 2.6.22-rc3 safe to migrate to? (score: 1)
Author: Christian Kujau <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 01:25:35 +0100 (BST)
On Sat, 2 Jun 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote: On Sat, 2 Jun 2007, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: XFS currently has a data-corrupting bug, where files which were appended by small amounts may lose their update
/archives/xfs/2007-06/msg00015.html (10,286 bytes)

9. Re: Kernel 2.6.22-rc3 safe to migrate to? (score: 1)
Author: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2007 23:30:49 -0700
That's the one. It's fairly subtle; there's no metadata/filesystem corruption, and the file just reverts back to a previous length, so if it were append-only, it would just return to a previous state
/archives/xfs/2007-06/msg00016.html (9,668 bytes)

10. Re: Kernel 2.6.22-rc3 safe to migrate to? (score: 1)
Author: Robert Hancock <hancockr@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 00:23:48 -0600
Justin Piszcz wrote: Sent this in another e-mail to LKML, it breaks support for my UPS: From jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sat Jun 2 18:43:52 2007 Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 18:43:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Justin Pi
/archives/xfs/2007-06/msg00017.html (10,166 bytes)

11. Re: Kernel 2.6.22-rc3 safe to migrate to? (score: 1)
Author: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 01:02:01 -0700
Oh, good. I hadn't read through the last couple of days of commits. J
/archives/xfs/2007-06/msg00018.html (9,549 bytes)

12. Re: Kernel 2.6.22-rc3 safe to migrate to? (score: 1)
Author: "Michal Piotrowski" <michal.k.k.piotrowski@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 09:59:15 +0200
On 03/06/07, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:> Justin Piszcz wrote:> > Wondering as their were a lot of XFS related issues early on in> > development..? The 2.6.22-rc3 kernel has the cor
/archives/xfs/2007-06/msg00019.html (11,068 bytes)

13. Re: Kernel 2.6.22-rc3 safe to migrate to? (score: 1)
Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 04:41:38 -0400 (EDT)
On Sun, 3 Jun 2007, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: Michal Piotrowski wrote: It's already merged into mainline http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=df3c7244264f1d125
/archives/xfs/2007-06/msg00020.html (10,042 bytes)

14. Kernel 2.6.22-rc3 safe to migrate to? (score: 1)
Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 17:24:58 -0400 (EDT)
Wondering as their were a lot of XFS related issues early on in development..? The 2.6.22-rc3 kernel has the core 2 duo coretemp patch by ruik which I want be running as long as 2.6.22-rc3 does not h
/archives/xfs/2007-06/msg00495.html (8,081 bytes)

15. Re: Kernel 2.6.22-rc3 safe to migrate to? (score: 1)
Author: Christian Kujau <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 22:59:01 +0100 (BST)
On Sat, 2 Jun 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote: Wondering as their were a lot of XFS related issues early on in development..? The 2.6.22-rc3 kernel has the core 2 duo coretemp patch by ruik which I want be
/archives/xfs/2007-06/msg00498.html (9,453 bytes)

16. Re: Kernel 2.6.22-rc3 safe to migrate to? (score: 1)
Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 18:09:30 -0400 (EDT)
On Sat, 2 Jun 2007, Christian Kujau wrote: On Sat, 2 Jun 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote: Wondering as their were a lot of XFS related issues early on in development..? The 2.6.22-rc3 kernel has the core 2
/archives/xfs/2007-06/msg00499.html (10,066 bytes)

17. Re: Kernel 2.6.22-rc3 safe to migrate to? (score: 1)
Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 18:27:05 -0400 (EDT)
Jun 2 18:23:23 p34 upsd[2225]: Can't connect to UPS [belkin] (newhidups-auto): No such file or directory Jun 2 18:24:23 p34 upsmon[2228]: Poll UPS [belkin@localhost] failed - Driver not connected Hmm
/archives/xfs/2007-06/msg00500.html (10,383 bytes)

18. Re: Kernel 2.6.22-rc3 safe to migrate to? (score: 1)
Author: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2007 15:54:09 -0700
XFS currently has a data-corrupting bug, where files which were appended by small amounts may lose their updates on umount - I see this corrupting hg repos. There's a patch which works for me, and is
/archives/xfs/2007-06/msg00502.html (9,236 bytes)

19. Re: Kernel 2.6.22-rc3 safe to migrate to? (score: 1)
Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 18:55:45 -0400 (EDT)
On Sat, 2 Jun 2007, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: Justin Piszcz wrote: Wondering as their were a lot of XFS related issues early on in development..? The 2.6.22-rc3 kernel has the core 2 duo coretemp pa
/archives/xfs/2007-06/msg00503.html (9,891 bytes)

20. Re: Kernel 2.6.22-rc3 safe to migrate to? (score: 1)
Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 20:27:22 -0400 (EDT)
On Sun, 3 Jun 2007, Christian Kujau wrote: On Sat, 2 Jun 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote: On Sat, 2 Jun 2007, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: XFS currently has a data-corrupting bug, where files which were appe
/archives/xfs/2007-06/msg00506.html (10,774 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu