Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Is\s+XFS\s+backwards\s+compatible\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Is\s+XFS\s+backwards\s+compatible\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Is XFS backwards compatible? (score: 1): Author: "Jesse W. Asher" <jasher1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2004 19:44:14 -0400; Hello all! I have a system with filesystems built with XFS 1.0.1. I'd like to reinstall it using the latest XFS, but I'm wondering if XFS 1.3.1 will be able to read the filesystems created with 1.0.1; /archives/xfs/2004-04/msg00055.html (7,010 bytes)
2. Re: Is XFS backwards compatible? (score: 1): Author: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2004 16:09:39 -0800; the on disk format doesn't change in incompatible ways, the versions have to do with code versions, not disk format versions. so yes your existing filesystems are perfectly fine. if you replace the r; /archives/xfs/2004-04/msg00056.html (8,301 bytes)
3. n (score: 1): Author: "Jesse W. Asher" <jasher1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2004 19:44:14 -0400; Hello all! I have a system with filesystems built with XFS 1.0.1. I'd like to reinstall it using the latest XFS, but I'm wondering if XFS 1.3.1 will be able to read the filesystems created with 1.0.1; /archives/xfs/2004-04/msg00319.html (7,010 bytes)
4. backwards compatible? (score: 1): Author: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2004 16:09:39 -0800; the on disk format doesn't change in incompatible ways, the versions have to do with code versions, not disk format versions. so yes your existing filesystems are perfectly fine. if you replace the r; /archives/xfs/2004-04/msg00320.html (8,301 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]