Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Iptables\-1\.2\.9\/10\s+compile\s+failure\s+with\s+linux\s+2\.6\.7\s+headers\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Iptables-1.2.9/10 compile failure with linux 2.6.7 headers (score: 1)
Author: _Domsch@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 02:18:18 +0900 (JST)
Please try this. Thanks == include/linux/netfilter.h 1.9 vs edited == -- 1.9/include/linux/netfilter.h 2004-06-07 12:15:03 +09:00 +++ edited/include/linux/netfilter.h 2004-06-19 02:10:55 +09:00 @@ -1
/archives/netdev/2004-06/msg00546.html (12,858 bytes)

2. Re: Iptables-1.2.9/10 compile failure with linux 2.6.7 headers (score: 1)
Author: omsch@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 03:36:11 +0900
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki wrote: In article <40D31EA6.5030207@xxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Sat, 19 Jun 2004 01:56:06 +0900), Kalin KOZHUHAROV <kalin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> says: Yes, I confirm with linux-2.6.7 and iptables-1.2.
/archives/netdev/2004-06/msg00550.html (14,484 bytes)

3. Re: Iptables-1.2.9/10 compile failure with linux 2.6.7 headers (score: 1)
Author: <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 07:51:28 +0900 (JST)
Patch is for current linux-2.5 bk tree, not for linux-headers. Please try to patch your kernel and set KERNEL_DIR to /path/to/your/kernel when you compile iptables. Thanks. --yoshfuji
/archives/netdev/2004-06/msg00572.html (9,239 bytes)

4. Re: Iptables-1.2.9/10 compile failure with linux 2.6.7 headers (score: 1)
Author: zik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 10:38:50 +0100
I can confirm that iptables-1.2.10 builds fine with your patch applied to linux-2.6.7 Andrew Walrond
/archives/netdev/2004-06/msg00576.html (8,953 bytes)

5. Re: Iptables-1.2.9/10 compile failure with linux 2.6.7 headers (score: 1)
Author: rzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 01:35:27 +0900 (JST)
Thanks. David? --yoshfuji
/archives/netdev/2004-06/msg00578.html (9,403 bytes)

6. Re: Iptables-1.2.9/10 compile failure with linux 2.6.7 headers (score: 1)
Author: ler" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 11:59:04 -0700
Applied.
/archives/netdev/2004-06/msg00585.html (9,465 bytes)

7. Re: Iptables-1.2.9/10 compile failure with linux 2.6.7 headers (score: 1)
Author: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 02:18:18 +0900 (JST)
Please try this. Thanks == include/linux/netfilter.h 1.9 vs edited == -- 1.9/include/linux/netfilter.h 2004-06-07 12:15:03 +09:00 +++ edited/include/linux/netfilter.h 2004-06-19 02:10:55 +09:00 @@ -1
/archives/netdev/2004-06/msg01430.html (13,075 bytes)

8. Re: Iptables-1.2.9/10 compile failure with linux 2.6.7 headers (score: 1)
Author: Kalin KOZHUHAROV <kalin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 03:36:11 +0900
Yes, I confirm with linux-2.6.7 and iptables-1.2.9 I got: gcc -march=athlon-xp -m3dnow -msse -mfpmath=sse -mmmx -O3 -pipe -Iinclude -Wall -Wunused -I/usr/src/linux/include -DIPTABLES_VERSION=\"1.2.9
/archives/netdev/2004-06/msg01434.html (14,674 bytes)

9. Re: Iptables-1.2.9/10 compile failure with linux 2.6.7 headers (score: 1)
Author: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 07:51:28 +0900 (JST)
Patch is for current linux-2.5 bk tree, not for linux-headers. Please try to patch your kernel and set KERNEL_DIR to /path/to/your/kernel when you compile iptables. Thanks. --yoshfuji
/archives/netdev/2004-06/msg01456.html (9,380 bytes)

10. Re: Iptables-1.2.9/10 compile failure with linux 2.6.7 headers (score: 1)
Author: Andrew Walrond <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 10:38:50 +0100
I can confirm that iptables-1.2.10 builds fine with your patch applied to linux-2.6.7 Andrew Walrond
/archives/netdev/2004-06/msg01460.html (9,155 bytes)

11. Re: Iptables-1.2.9/10 compile failure with linux 2.6.7 headers (score: 1)
Author: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 01:35:27 +0900 (JST)
Thanks. David? --yoshfuji
/archives/netdev/2004-06/msg01462.html (9,562 bytes)

12. Re: Iptables-1.2.9/10 compile failure with linux 2.6.7 headers (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 11:59:04 -0700
Applied.
/archives/netdev/2004-06/msg01469.html (9,673 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu