Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Inode\s+cache\s+uses\s+a\s+lot\s+of\s+memory\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Inode\s+cache\s+uses\s+a\s+lot\s+of\s+memory\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. ots (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 12:56:49 -0500; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00449.html (9,068 bytes)
2. ory (score: 1): Author: >; Date: 25 Feb 2002 12:07:49 -0600; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00450.html (11,712 bytes)
3. ots (score: 1): Author: >; Date: 25 Feb 2002 14:42:53 -0600; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00453.html (10,060 bytes)
4. ory (score: 1): Author: >; Date: 25 Feb 2002 15:38:58 -0600; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00454.html (8,746 bytes)
5. ug) (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 11:38:49 -0500; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00473.html (9,474 bytes)
6. apshots (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 12:56:49 -0500; o; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01023.html (9,068 bytes)
7. memory (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: 25 Feb 2002 12:07:49 -0600; R; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01024.html (11,712 bytes)
8. apshots (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: 25 Feb 2002 14:42:53 -0600; s; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01027.html (10,060 bytes)
9. memory (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: 25 Feb 2002 15:38:58 -0600; e; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01028.html (8,746 bytes)
10. st bug) (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 11:38:49 -0500; e; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01047.html (9,474 bytes)
11. Inode cache uses a lot of memory (score: 1): Author: "Sebastian Kun" <seb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 12:56:49 -0500; Hi, I've been doing some SPEC SFS97 (http://www.spec.org/osg/sfs97r1/) testing for my company. SFS is a benchmark for evaluating NFS performance, measuring both throughput (NFS ops/sec), and latency; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01597.html (9,098 bytes)
12. Re: Inode cache uses a lot of memory (score: 1): Author: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 25 Feb 2002 12:07:49 -0600; I also see similar things as well. On the system most everything is fine except for indoe_cache and xfs_inode. They are orders of magnitude larger. I *am* using logbufs=8, I assume that's part of it,; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01598.html (11,826 bytes)
13. Re: Inode cache uses a lot of memory (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: 25 Feb 2002 14:42:53 -0600; Well, the xfs inode cache is pretty much controlled via the inode cache, which is only shrunk if you get into the cache pruning code if you run short of memory. I can easily prune out my inode cache; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01601.html (10,159 bytes)
14. Re: Inode cache uses a lot of memory (score: 1): Author: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 25 Feb 2002 15:38:58 -0600; To date I don't, but my only other system, not XFS is not the same configuration either. As a matter of fact, I've only got 1 system like the one which is shown here. Of note though, *my* stats are v; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01602.html (8,812 bytes)
15. Re: Inode cache uses a lot of memory (score: 1): Author: "Sebastian Kun" <seb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 11:38:49 -0500; Reiserfs behaves a bit differently. After running the same test: inode_cache 1190503 1883987 512 269141 269141 1 : 124 62 The inode_cache uses around 1GB of memory. This is a bit more than XFS, which; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01621.html (9,549 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]