Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*IRIX\s+6\.5\.6m\/XFS\s+CVS\:\s+Any\s+problems\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*IRIX\s+6\.5\.6m\/XFS\s+CVS\:\s+Any\s+problems\?\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

1. Re: IRIX 6.5.6m/XFS CVS: Any problems? (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 09:02:05 -0500; You may want to upgrade to the latest Irix release, there were some problems with NFS V3 between Linux and Irix. The Irix implementation expected the NFS file handles to be of a specific size, and L; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00005.html (8,891 bytes)
2. Re: IRIX 6.5.6m/XFS CVS: Any problems? (score: 1): Author: Utz Lehmann <ulehmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 16:31:21 +0200; I had grabed a small patch for the linux nfs server on lkml. It's set the file handle size on the linux nfs server to a value (older) IRIX Versions (and HP-UX 10.20) can understand. I have used this; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00006.html (10,123 bytes)
3. Re: IRIX 6.5.6m/XFS CVS: Any problems? (score: 1): Author: "Sean Elble" <S_Elble@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 22:49:16 -0400; Can I upgrade from the SGI web site? I know I can download the 6.5.13 files (900 or so MB), but, will this work OK? I am already in the maintaince stream, so I won't have that damn "stream switch" p; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00028.html (10,036 bytes)
4. Re: IRIX 6.5.6m/XFS CVS: Any problems? (score: 1): Author: "Sean Elble" <S_Elble@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 22:51:57 -0400; Thanks for the information; do you know if this patch needs to be applied for NFS v3 to work from IRIX to Linux? It looks really easy to apply manually if it doesn't apply automatically . . . I've b; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00029.html (10,589 bytes)
5. Re: IRIX 6.5.6m/XFS CVS: Any problems? (score: 1): Author: Tad Dolphay <tbd@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 07:39:45 -0500 (CDT); For the most part NFS V3 will still work using a pre 6.5.13 IRIX client and 2.4 linux server. The problem is that sometimes when doing a pwd on a NFS mounted directory you won't see the entire path; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00034.html (10,891 bytes)
6. Re: IRIX 6.5.6m/XFS CVS: Any problems? (score: 1): Author: Tad Dolphay <tbd@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 07:49:44 -0500 (CDT); Tad; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00036.html (10,468 bytes)
7. Re: IRIX 6.5.6m/XFS CVS: Any problems? (score: 1): Author: Utz Lehmann <ulehmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 15:14:59 +0200; Yes, and the IRIX ftpd, Midnight Commander (mc), xemacs, ... are confused too. I just tested a 2.4.10 xfs kernel (with preempt patch, but _without_ the nfs patch i had attached in my last mail). It's; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00037.html (9,329 bytes)
8. Re: IRIX 6.5.6m/XFS CVS: Any problems? (score: 1): Author: "Sean Elble" <S_Elble@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 22:05:38 -0400; So, in other words, I shouldn't have any problems checking out the XFS tree at kernel version 2.4.10? (At least based upon your knowledge) -Sean -- Original Message -- From: "Utz Lehmann" <ulehmann@; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00054.html (9,915 bytes)
9. Re: IRIX 6.5.6m/XFS CVS: Any problems? (score: 1): Author: "Sean Elble" <S_Elble@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 22:04:24 -0400; OK, thanks for the information. Do you know if the patch Utz sent me will fix any of those problems? Thanks again! -Sean -- Original Message -- From: "Tad Dolphay" <tbd@xxxxxxx> To: <S_Elble@xxxxxxxx; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00055.html (11,846 bytes)
10. Re: IRIX 6.5.6m/XFS CVS: Any problems? (score: 1): Author: Utz Lehmann <ulehmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 10:48:57 +0200; Hi Sean Yes. I tested it with a 2.4.10 XFS kernel (CVS from Sep 24). The pwd problem is gone. But I didn't tests it deeply, make some tests yourself. utz; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00073.html (10,786 bytes)
11. Re: IRIX 6.5.6m/XFS CVS: Any problems? (score: 1): Author: "Sean Elble" <S_Elble@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 21:20:16 -0400; I plan on now trying it this weekend . . . got hung up on some other issues. Thanks for the info! -Sean -- Original Message -- From: "Utz Lehmann" <ulehmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "Sean Elble" <S_Elble@; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00103.html (11,468 bytes)
12. Re: IRIX 6.5.6m/XFS CVS: Any problems? (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 09:02:05 -0500; n; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01085.html (8,891 bytes)
13. Re: IRIX 6.5.6m/XFS CVS: Any problems? (score: 1): Author: Utz Lehmann <ulehmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 16:31:21 +0200; L; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01086.html (10,123 bytes)
14. Re: IRIX 6.5.6m/XFS CVS: Any problems? (score: 1): Author: "Sean Elble" <S_Elble@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 22:49:16 -0400; .; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01108.html (10,036 bytes)
15. Re: IRIX 6.5.6m/XFS CVS: Any problems? (score: 1): Author: "Sean Elble" <S_Elble@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 22:51:57 -0400; p; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01109.html (10,589 bytes)
16. Re: IRIX 6.5.6m/XFS CVS: Any problems? (score: 1): Author: Tad Dolphay <tbd@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 07:39:45 -0500 (CDT); x; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01114.html (10,891 bytes)
17. Re: IRIX 6.5.6m/XFS CVS: Any problems? (score: 1): Author: Tad Dolphay <tbd@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 07:49:44 -0500 (CDT); t; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01116.html (10,468 bytes)
18. Re: IRIX 6.5.6m/XFS CVS: Any problems? (score: 1): Author: Utz Lehmann <ulehmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 15:14:59 +0200; d; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01117.html (9,329 bytes)
19. Re: IRIX 6.5.6m/XFS CVS: Any problems? (score: 1): Author: "Sean Elble" <S_Elble@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 22:05:38 -0400; e; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01134.html (9,915 bytes)
20. Re: IRIX 6.5.6m/XFS CVS: Any problems? (score: 1): Author: "Sean Elble" <S_Elble@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 22:04:24 -0400; @; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01135.html (11,846 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]