Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*IPv6\s+\&\s+QoS\s+in\s+Linux\s+\-\s+current\s+state\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*IPv6\s+\&\s+QoS\s+in\s+Linux\s+\-\s+current\s+state\?\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. IPv6 & QoS in Linux - current state? (score: 1): Author: Peter Bieringer <pb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 08:55:21 +0200; I got a question regarding the implementation of IPv6 & QoS in Linux. Does anyone know the current state? Results will also be filled into my kernel-IPv6-status page (where QoS is still missing as I; /archives/netdev/2001-10/msg00161.html (8,251 bytes)
2. Re: IPv6 & QoS in Linux - current state? (score: 1): Author: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 23:09:53 +0400 (MSK DST); The state is the same as with IP. I.e. "complete". No idea. User level support for diffserv and intserv may be missing in all the distributions. Kernel side is present as soon as distibution distrib; /archives/netdev/2001-10/msg00163.html (8,199 bytes)
3. Re: IPv6 & QoS in Linux - current state? (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 14:50:31 -0500 (CDT); Speaking of QoS, the new RealTek chips support two Tx outgoing queues, one for "normal Tx", and one for "priority Tx". Is there any way to make the priority Tx queue useful to the kernel? Jeff; /archives/netdev/2001-10/msg00164.html (8,789 bytes)
4. Re: IPv6 & QoS in Linux - current state? (score: 1): Author: Peter Bieringer <pb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 23:44:54 +0200; Nice to hear. Ok. BTW: can you give me an update for the current values in my table and perhaps extensions? Currently: Flow label support 2.4.x: working 2.2.x: unknown Flow label specific routing 2.; /archives/netdev/2001-10/msg00165.html (8,814 bytes)
5. Re: IPv6 & QoS in Linux - current state? (score: 1): Author: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 16:39:39 -0700; You could look at VLAN's priority bits and do good things based on them when VLANs are in use... Ben -- Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Ben_Greear@xxxxxxxxxx> President of Candela Technologies; /archives/netdev/2001-10/msg00166.html (9,605 bytes)
6. Re: IPv6 & QoS in Linux - current state? (score: 1): Author: Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 09:09:09 +0300 (EEST); Hmm, I'm not sure if it's glibc, kernel or both, but some updated API/advanced API hooks for setting QoS related bits in the datagrams from the userspace without raw sockets or the like were missing; /archives/netdev/2001-10/msg00167.html (8,652 bytes)
7. Re: IPv6 & QoS in Linux - current state? (score: 1): Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 07:57:57 -0400 (EDT); Jeff, Use the skb->priority to select what queue to send it to. cheers, jamal; /archives/netdev/2001-10/msg00168.html (8,423 bytes)
8. Re: IPv6 & QoS in Linux - current state? (score: 1): Author: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 21:52:42 +0400 (MSK DST); Unfortunately, no generic way. It is a design problem to think on. "tbusy" approach is inadequate for this. The only working scheme is used by ATM, which hooks special qdisc "atm" and multiplexes pa; /archives/netdev/2001-10/msg00171.html (8,729 bytes)
9. Re: IPv6 & QoS in Linux - current state? (score: 1): Author: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 22:53:46 +0400 (MSK DST); Surely, it is not glibc, because people may compile rsvpd (good sample, because it accesses almost all the elements of the engine) using glibc. :-) I mean scripts for setting up diffserv (which is h; /archives/netdev/2001-10/msg00172.html (8,213 bytes)
10. IPv6 & QoS in Linux - current state? (score: 1): Author: Peter Bieringer <pb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 08:55:21 +0200; Hi, I got a question regarding the implementation of IPv6 & QoS in Linux. Does anyone know the current state? Results will also be filled into my kernel-IPv6-status page (where QoS is still missing a; /archives/netdev/2001-10/msg00399.html (8,251 bytes)
11. Re: IPv6 & QoS in Linux - current state? (score: 1): Author: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 23:09:53 +0400 (MSK DST); Hello! The state is the same as with IP. I.e. "complete". No idea. User level support for diffserv and intserv may be missing in all the distributions. Kernel side is present as soon as distibution d; /archives/netdev/2001-10/msg00401.html (8,254 bytes)
12. Re: IPv6 & QoS in Linux - current state? (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 14:50:31 -0500 (CDT); Speaking of QoS, the new RealTek chips support two Tx outgoing queues, one for "normal Tx", and one for "priority Tx". Is there any way to make the priority Tx queue useful to the kernel? Jeff; /archives/netdev/2001-10/msg00402.html (8,818 bytes)
13. Re: IPv6 & QoS in Linux - current state? (score: 1): Author: Peter Bieringer <pb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 23:44:54 +0200; Hi, Nice to hear. Ok. BTW: can you give me an update for the current values in my table and perhaps extensions? Currently: Flow label support 2.4.x: working 2.2.x: unknown Flow label specific routing; /archives/netdev/2001-10/msg00403.html (8,872 bytes)
14. Re: IPv6 & QoS in Linux - current state? (score: 1): Author: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 16:39:39 -0700; You could look at VLAN's priority bits and do good things based on them when VLANs are in use... Ben -- Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Ben_Greear@xxxxxxxxxx> President of Candela Technologies; /archives/netdev/2001-10/msg00404.html (9,698 bytes)
15. Re: IPv6 & QoS in Linux - current state? (score: 1): Author: Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 09:09:09 +0300 (EEST); Hmm, I'm not sure if it's glibc, kernel or both, but some updated API/advanced API hooks for setting QoS related bits in the datagrams from the userspace without raw sockets or the like were missing; /archives/netdev/2001-10/msg00405.html (8,681 bytes)
16. Re: IPv6 & QoS in Linux - current state? (score: 1): Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 07:57:57 -0400 (EDT); Jeff, Use the skb->priority to select what queue to send it to. cheers, jamal; /archives/netdev/2001-10/msg00406.html (8,471 bytes)
17. Re: IPv6 & QoS in Linux - current state? (score: 1): Author: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 21:52:42 +0400 (MSK DST); Hello! Unfortunately, no generic way. It is a design problem to think on. "tbusy" approach is inadequate for this. The only working scheme is used by ATM, which hooks special qdisc "atm" and multiple; /archives/netdev/2001-10/msg00409.html (8,777 bytes)
18. Re: IPv6 & QoS in Linux - current state? (score: 1): Author: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 22:53:46 +0400 (MSK DST); Hello! Surely, it is not glibc, because people may compile rsvpd (good sample, because it accesses almost all the elements of the engine) using glibc. :-) I mean scripts for setting up diffserv (whic; /archives/netdev/2001-10/msg00410.html (8,261 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]