Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*IPV6_HOPOPTS\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. IPV6_HOPOPTS (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2001 22:17:58 +0100
Hello out there, I'am trying to use the hop-by-hop options with ipv6 but I can't manage to resceive those options on an intermediate router along the packets deliverypath from source to destination.
/archives/netdev/2001-11/msg00030.html (8,358 bytes)

2. Re: IPV6_HOPOPTS (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 08:36:06 +0300 (MSK)
Forwarded packets are not delivered to sockets. Apparently, you want to use Router Alert option, to reserve some ID and to instruct a socket to grab the packets using option IPV6_ROUTER_ALERT. Alexe
/archives/netdev/2001-11/msg00038.html (7,524 bytes)

3. Re: IPV6_HOPOPTS (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 08:35:47 +0100
I see that this is also a candidate for my purpose but as I understood IPv6 HopByHop-extension-headers they must be processed by every node (also the forwarding ) along the packets delivery path. RF
/archives/netdev/2001-11/msg00047.html (7,983 bytes)

4. Re: IPV6_HOPOPTS (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 17:39:36 +0900
IPV6_HOPOPTS is only for source / destination nodes. We cannot use it at intermediate nodes. --yoshfuji
/archives/netdev/2001-11/msg00048.html (8,130 bytes)

5. Re: IPV6_HOPOPTS (score: 1)
Author: uji@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 10:22:58 +0100
sorry for being so obstinate: We cannot use, not even intercept them at intermediate nodes? But why and whats the difference to IPV6_DSTOPTS then?? ... axel
/archives/netdev/2001-11/msg00049.html (8,026 bytes)

6. Re: IPV6_HOPOPTS (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 20:18:37 +0900
Userland code (/ kernel) of source node can generate hbh / dst option(s). (userland code uses advanced API for this.) Kernels of intermediate and destination nodes handle hbh option(s), but userland
/archives/netdev/2001-11/msg00050.html (9,074 bytes)

7. Re: IPV6_HOPOPTS (score: 1)
Author: oshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 12:25:46 +0100
RFC 1883 IPv6 Specification December 1995 4.3 Hop-by-Hop Options Header The Hop-by-Hop Options header is used to carry optional information that must be examined by every node along a packet's delive
/archives/netdev/2001-11/msg00051.html (8,473 bytes)

8. Re: IPV6_HOPOPTS (score: 1)
Author: gler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 19:58:24 +0300 (MSK)
You are. Only router alert can withdraw packet from forwarding path. Alexey
/archives/netdev/2001-11/msg00052.html (7,374 bytes)

9. IPV6_HOPOPTS (score: 1)
Author: root <insel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2001 22:17:58 +0100
Hello out there, I'am trying to use the hop-by-hop options with ipv6 but I can't manage to resceive those options on an intermediate router along the packets deliverypath from source to destination.
/archives/netdev/2001-11/msg00123.html (8,358 bytes)

10. Re: IPV6_HOPOPTS (score: 1)
Author: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 08:36:06 +0300 (MSK)
Hello! Forwarded packets are not delivered to sockets. Apparently, you want to use Router Alert option, to reserve some ID and to instruct a socket to grab the packets using option IPV6_ROUTER_ALERT.
/archives/netdev/2001-11/msg00131.html (7,549 bytes)

11. Re: IPV6_HOPOPTS (score: 1)
Author: root <insel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 08:35:47 +0100
Hi, I see that this is also a candidate for my purpose but as I understood IPv6 HopByHop-extension-headers they must be processed by every node (also the forwarding ) along the packets delivery path.
/archives/netdev/2001-11/msg00140.html (8,012 bytes)

12. Re: IPV6_HOPOPTS (score: 1)
Author: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 17:39:36 +0900
IPV6_HOPOPTS is only for source / destination nodes. We cannot use it at intermediate nodes. --yoshfuji
/archives/netdev/2001-11/msg00141.html (8,209 bytes)

13. Re: IPV6_HOPOPTS (score: 1)
Author: root <insel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 10:22:58 +0100
sorry for being so obstinate: We cannot use, not even intercept them at intermediate nodes? But why and whats the difference to IPV6_DSTOPTS then?? ... axel
/archives/netdev/2001-11/msg00142.html (8,112 bytes)

14. Re: IPV6_HOPOPTS (score: 1)
Author: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 20:18:37 +0900
Userland code (/ kernel) of source node can generate hbh / dst option(s). (userland code uses advanced API for this.) Kernels of intermediate and destination nodes handle hbh option(s), but userland
/archives/netdev/2001-11/msg00143.html (9,181 bytes)

15. Re: IPV6_HOPOPTS (score: 1)
Author: Jürgen Nagler <juergen.nagler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 12:25:46 +0100
RFC 1883 IPv6 Specification December 1995 4.3 Hop-by-Hop Options Header The Hop-by-Hop Options header is used to carry optional information that must be examined by every node along a packet's delive
/archives/netdev/2001-11/msg00144.html (8,559 bytes)

16. Re: IPV6_HOPOPTS (score: 1)
Author: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 19:58:24 +0300 (MSK)
Hello! You are. Only router alert can withdraw packet from forwarding path. Alexey
/archives/netdev/2001-11/msg00145.html (7,399 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu