Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*IP\s+stack\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*IP\s+stack\s+question\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. IP stack question (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 07:39:55 -0400; I am writing this e-mail at the recommendation of Alan Cox. I have an embedded system running on cPCI HW which has two physical Ethernet connections. This system is connected to an internal network a; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00142.html (7,475 bytes)
2. Re: IP stack question (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 09:34:47 -0400 (EDT); I tried to explain to you in private mail: Both 10.1.1.4 and 10.1.1.5 are recognized to be local addresses by the IP stack. It is legit that the stack limits the scope to just that i.e _local_ The on; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00143.html (8,459 bytes)
3. Re: IP stack question (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 10:48:15 -0700; jamal wrote: I tried to explain to you in private mail: Both 10.1.1.4 and 10.1.1.5 are recognized to be local addresses by the IP stack. It is legit that the stack limits the scope to just that i.e _; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00144.html (8,940 bytes)
4. Re: IP stack question (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 14:59:04 -0400 (EDT); Unless i misunderstood: He seems to be trying to do a loopback test from one of his interfaces to the network and back on another of his interfaces. This would probably cause a broadcast storm if you; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00145.html (8,360 bytes)
5. Re: IP stack question (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 12:27:08 -0700; jamal wrote: On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Ben Greear wrote: Try that SO_DONTROUTE and see if solves your problem; you probably have to bind the socket to a specific device as well; For all that trouble, i wo; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00146.html (8,860 bytes)
6. IP stack question (score: 1): Author: "Bloch, Jack" <Jack.Bloch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 07:39:55 -0400; I am writing this e-mail at the recommendation of Alan Cox. I have an embedded system running on cPCI HW which has two physical Ethernet connections. This system is connected to an internal network a; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00293.html (7,475 bytes)
7. Re: IP stack question (score: 1): Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 09:34:47 -0400 (EDT); I tried to explain to you in private mail: Both 10.1.1.4 and 10.1.1.5 are recognized to be local addresses by the IP stack. It is legit that the stack limits the scope to just that i.e _local_ The on; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00294.html (8,505 bytes)
8. Re: IP stack question (score: 1): Author: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 10:48:15 -0700; jamal wrote: I tried to explain to you in private mail: Both 10.1.1.4 and 10.1.1.5 are recognized to be local addresses by the IP stack. It is legit that the stack limits the scope to just that i.e _; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00295.html (8,874 bytes)
9. Re: IP stack question (score: 1): Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 14:59:04 -0400 (EDT); Unless i misunderstood: He seems to be trying to do a loopback test from one of his interfaces to the network and back on another of his interfaces. This would probably cause a broadcast storm if you; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00296.html (8,384 bytes)
10. Re: IP stack question (score: 1): Author: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 12:27:08 -0700; Try that SO_DONTROUTE and see if solves your problem; you probably have to bind the socket to a specific device as well; For all that trouble, i would suggest you may just as well write a sock packe; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00297.html (8,879 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]