Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*IP\s+More\s+Fragements\s+bit\s+problem\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*IP\s+More\s+Fragements\s+bit\s+problem\.\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. IP More Fragements bit problem. (score: 1): Author: <ecalicchio@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:08:16 +0100; Hello all, I am working on NFSv4 and I found an IP problem while doing interoperability testing with AIX. The More Fragements (MF) bits is set on the last packet sent in a list of packets that sould; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00383.html (8,373 bytes)
2. Re: IP More Fragements bit problem. (score: 1): Author: Dan Siemon <dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 19:24:42 +0100; Are you sure? I tested 2.6.10rc3 and it works correctly for me with ping. The algorithm in ip_fragment() looks good too from visual inspection. And ping uses the same code to fragment as NFS sunrpc o; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00385.html (8,975 bytes)
3. Re: IP More Fragements bit problem. (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:44:47 -0800; Vincent Roqueta wrote: On kernel 2.6.10rc2 and laters (last tested is 2.6.11-rc3) we have: A + MF B + MF C + MF D + MF That cause AIX waiting for the last packet with out sending ack So Linux suppose; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00386.html (8,581 bytes)
4. Re: IP More Fragements bit problem. (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:27:38 +0100; Le vendredi 11 Février 2005 19:24, vous avez écrit : Yes, I am sure testing with NFSv3 over UDP. I can send you traces seen by AIX. Ok. I don't have that :( I am not testing NFSv4 over UDP, I am doin; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00461.html (9,596 bytes)
5. Re: IP More Fragements bit problem. (score: 1): Author: lgoci <mgalgoci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:29:24 +0100; Le vendredi 11 Février 2005 19:44, vous avez écrit : No, we are not sure. It is possible we lack the last fragement witch is not marked with the MF bit. Vincent ROQUETA; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00462.html (8,810 bytes)
6. Re: IP More Fragements bit problem. (score: 1): Author: Vincent Roqueta <vincent.roqueta@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:37:25 +0100; You are right. All fragments are not sent !!! And so the last fragment received is not the last fragment sent by the client. The MF is set and that is correct. Sorry :/ Vincent; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00465.html (8,557 bytes)
7. IP More Fragements bit problem. (score: 1): Author: Vincent Roqueta <vincent.roqueta@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:08:16 +0100; Hello all, I am working on NFSv4 and I found an IP problem while doing interoperability testing with AIX. The More Fragements (MF) bits is set on the last packet sent in a list of packets that sould; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg01403.html (8,373 bytes)
8. Re: IP More Fragements bit problem. (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 19:24:42 +0100; Are you sure? I tested 2.6.10rc3 and it works correctly for me with ping. The algorithm in ip_fragment() looks good too from visual inspection. And ping uses the same code to fragment as NFS sunrpc o; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg01405.html (9,059 bytes)
9. Re: IP More Fragements bit problem. (score: 1): Author: Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:44:47 -0800; On kernel 2.6.10rc2 and laters (last tested is 2.6.11-rc3) we have: A + MF B + MF C + MF D + MF That cause AIX waiting for the last packet with out sending ack So Linux suppose AIX didn't receive all; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg01406.html (8,636 bytes)
10. Re: IP More Fragements bit problem. (score: 1): Author: Vincent Roqueta <vincent.roqueta@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:27:38 +0100; Le vendredi 11 Février 2005 19:24, vous avez écrit : Yes, I am sure testing with NFSv3 over UDP. I can send you traces seen by AIX. Ok. I don't have that :( I am not testing NFSv4 over UDP, I am doin; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg01481.html (9,682 bytes)
11. Re: IP More Fragements bit problem. (score: 1): Author: Vincent Roqueta <vincent.roqueta@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:29:24 +0100; Le vendredi 11 Février 2005 19:44, vous avez écrit : No, we are not sure. It is possible we lack the last fragement witch is not marked with the MF bit. Vincent ROQUETA; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg01482.html (8,900 bytes)
12. Re: IP More Fragements bit problem. (score: 1): Author: Vincent Roqueta <vincent.roqueta@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:37:25 +0100; Hello, You are right. All fragments are not sent !!! And so the last fragment received is not the last fragment sent by the client. The MF is set and that is correct. Sorry :/ Vincent; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg01485.html (8,707 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]