Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Hang\s+when\s+mounting\s+XFS\s+root\s+in\s+2\.6\.0\s+tests\s+on\s+x86\-64\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Hang when mounting XFS root in 2.6.0 tests on x86-64 (score: 1)
Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 23:00:42 +0200
Better report it to linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx (cc'ed) too. I test XFS (but not as root) occasionally on x86-64 and seen no problems so far. I haven't tested it with test2+ yet though. What compiler are y
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00223.html (8,808 bytes)

2. Re: Hang when mounting XFS root in 2.6.0 tests on x86-64 (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 21 Aug 2003 19:55:32 -0500
Seems to suggest a platform specific problem with this code, Andi, didn't you write the function behind xfs_lowbit64? This code chunk will be the same no matter which filesystem you are mounting, if
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00240.html (9,558 bytes)

3. Re: Hang when mounting XFS root in 2.6.0 tests on x86-64 (score: 1)
Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 08:53:03 +0200
Boot noapic ? Cheers -- Seth It might just be your lucky day, if you only knew.
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00247.html (8,493 bytes)

4. Re: Hang when mounting XFS root in 2.6.0 tests on x86-64 (score: 1)
Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 11:26:42 +0200
First at least the comment on top of xfs_lowbit64() is not correct. ffs() only handles an 32bit argument, not 64bit. Hope that isn't a problem. Hmm, one difference is that the x86-64 ffs will return
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00251.html (9,847 bytes)

5. Re: Hang when mounting XFS root in 2.6.0 tests on x86-64 (score: 1)
Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 23:00:42 +0200
Better report it to linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx (cc'ed) too. I test XFS (but not as root) occasionally on x86-64 and seen no problems so far. I haven't tested it with test2+ yet though. What compiler are y
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00575.html (8,808 bytes)

6. Re: Hang when mounting XFS root in 2.6.0 tests on x86-64 (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 21 Aug 2003 19:55:32 -0500
Seems to suggest a platform specific problem with this code, Andi, didn't you write the function behind xfs_lowbit64? This code chunk will be the same no matter which filesystem you are mounting, if
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00592.html (9,558 bytes)

7. Re: Hang when mounting XFS root in 2.6.0 tests on x86-64 (score: 1)
Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 08:53:03 +0200
Boot noapic ? Cheers -- Seth It might just be your lucky day, if you only knew.
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00599.html (8,493 bytes)

8. Re: Hang when mounting XFS root in 2.6.0 tests on x86-64 (score: 1)
Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 11:26:42 +0200
First at least the comment on top of xfs_lowbit64() is not correct. ffs() only handles an 32bit argument, not 64bit. Hope that isn't a problem. Hmm, one difference is that the x86-64 ffs will return
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00603.html (9,847 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu