Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*GRE\s+tunnel\s+keepalive\s+support\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*GRE\s+tunnel\s+keepalive\s+support\?\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. GRE tunnel keepalive support? (score: 1): Author: Daniel Roesen <dr@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 06:44:20 +0100; is anybody aware of anyone implementing keepalives for GRE tunnels? I don't want to duplicate efforts... http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1838/ products_feature_guide09186a0080134a3; /archives/netdev/2003-12/msg00169.html (7,086 bytes)
2. Re: GRE tunnel keepalive support? (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 22:33:21 -0800; Not to my knowledge. It looks like a rather simple mechanism, and should be easy to code up. Feel free.; /archives/netdev/2003-12/msg00170.html (7,601 bytes)
3. Re: GRE tunnel keepalive support? (score: 1): Author: Daniel Roesen <dr@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 07:52:58 +0100; OK, anything else than "easy" would be out of scope anyway, given significant time constraints and never did any kernel work at all (except some micropatches). Given that there is no documentation wh; /archives/netdev/2003-12/msg00172.html (8,246 bytes)
4. GRE tunnel keepalive support? (score: 1): Author: Daniel Roesen <dr@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 06:44:20 +0100; Hi, is anybody aware of anyone implementing keepalives for GRE tunnels? I don't want to duplicate efforts... http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1838/ products_feature_guide09186a008013; /archives/netdev/2003-12/msg00568.html (7,101 bytes)
5. Re: GRE tunnel keepalive support? (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 22:33:21 -0800; Not to my knowledge. It looks like a rather simple mechanism, and should be easy to code up. Feel free.; /archives/netdev/2003-12/msg00569.html (7,674 bytes)
6. Re: GRE tunnel keepalive support? (score: 1): Author: Daniel Roesen <dr@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 07:52:58 +0100; OK, anything else than "easy" would be out of scope anyway, given significant time constraints and never did any kernel work at all (except some micropatches). Given that there is no documentation wh; /archives/netdev/2003-12/msg00571.html (8,405 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]