Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*FS\s+Limits\s+$fwd$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*FS\s+Limits\s+$fwd$\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. Re: FS Limits (fwd) (score: 1): Author:; Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 09:46:13 +0200 (CEST); I have some questions and am wondering if you could help me any further: it is stated that XFS has a file system size limit of 9 EB. But I could imagine that this could refer to a fs block size of 64; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00116.html (7,379 bytes)
2. Re: FS Limits (fwd) (score: 1): Author:; Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 10:46:25 +0200; At 09:46 13-5-2003 +0200, Oliver Tennert wrote: I have some questions and am wondering if you could help me any further: it is stated that XFS has a file system size limit of 9 EB. But I could imagin; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00117.html (8,146 bytes)
3. Re: FS Limits (fwd) (score: 1): Author:; Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 12:09:12 +0200 (CEST); And what about LBD support in 2.5.x kernels or LBD patches in ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/patches/weekly-snapshot-patch/ ? That should address 2TB limit or not? jan -- We've been walled-i; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00119.html (8,129 bytes)
4. Re: FS Limits (fwd) (score: 1): Author:; Date: 13 May 2003 11:15:30 -0500; Irix can do the insanely large sizes - although there are practical limitations which come into play before you can get there. We do have customers with filesystems on the order of 100 Tbytes in size; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00124.html (9,158 bytes)
5. Re: FS Limits (fwd) (score: 1): Author:; Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 13:33:58 +0200 (CEST); Yes, I am aware of the page cache limit. My question is more theoretical of nature, anyway. What I wanted to know is just that: there are limits with Linux due to the page cache, the block device etc; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00135.html (8,821 bytes)
6. Re: FS Limits (fwd) (score: 1): Author:; Date: 14 May 2003 07:11:49 -0500; Probably larger than you can physically attach to it, the theoretical limit is 18 Peta bytes, not 9. The pages here (marketing info): http://www.sgi.com/software/xfs/ talk about 8000 Tbytes being phy; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00136.html (8,912 bytes)
7. Re: FS Limits (fwd) (score: 1): Author:; Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 14:41:05 +0200 (CEST); Do you mean 18 Exabyte = 2^64 Byte, now (sorry for pestering you)? I am only interested in the XFS code limit. Thanks and best regards Oliver Dr. Oliver Tennert +49 -7071 -9457-598 e-mail: O.Tennert@; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00138.html (9,003 bytes)
8. Re: FS Limits (fwd) (score: 1): Author: >; Date: 14 May 2003 07:53:36 -0500; Yes, sorry, its still early here ;-) Steve; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00140.html (9,062 bytes)
9. Re: FS Limits (fwd) (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 09:46:13 +0200 (CEST); I have some questions and am wondering if you could help me any further: it is stated that XFS has a file system size limit of 9 EB. But I could imagine that this could refer to a fs block size of 64; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00423.html (7,379 bytes)
10. Re: FS Limits (fwd) (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 10:46:25 +0200; At 09:46 13-5-2003 +0200, Oliver Tennert wrote: I have some questions and am wondering if you could help me any further: it is stated that XFS has a file system size limit of 9 EB. But I could imagin; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00424.html (8,146 bytes)
11. Re: FS Limits (fwd) (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 12:09:12 +0200 (CEST); And what about LBD support in 2.5.x kernels or LBD patches in ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/patches/weekly-snapshot-patch/ ? That should address 2TB limit or not? jan -- We've been walled-i; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00426.html (8,129 bytes)
12. Re: FS Limits (fwd) (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: 13 May 2003 11:15:30 -0500; Irix can do the insanely large sizes - although there are practical limitations which come into play before you can get there. We do have customers with filesystems on the order of 100 Tbytes in size; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00431.html (9,158 bytes)
13. Re: FS Limits (fwd) (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 13:33:58 +0200 (CEST); Yes, I am aware of the page cache limit. My question is more theoretical of nature, anyway. What I wanted to know is just that: there are limits with Linux due to the page cache, the block device etc; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00442.html (8,821 bytes)
14. Re: FS Limits (fwd) (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: 14 May 2003 07:11:49 -0500; Probably larger than you can physically attach to it, the theoretical limit is 18 Peta bytes, not 9. The pages here (marketing info): http://www.sgi.com/software/xfs/ talk about 8000 Tbytes being phy; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00443.html (8,912 bytes)
15. Re: FS Limits (fwd) (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 14:41:05 +0200 (CEST); Do you mean 18 Exabyte = 2^64 Byte, now (sorry for pestering you)? I am only interested in the XFS code limit. Thanks and best regards Oliver Dr. Oliver Tennert +49 -7071 -9457-598 e-mail: O.Tennert@; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00445.html (9,003 bytes)
16. Re: FS Limits (fwd) (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxx>; Date: 14 May 2003 07:53:36 -0500; Yes, sorry, its still early here ;-) Steve; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00447.html (9,062 bytes)
17. Re: FS Limits (fwd) (score: 1): Author: Oliver Tennert <tennert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 09:46:13 +0200 (CEST); I have some questions and am wondering if you could help me any further: it is stated that XFS has a file system size limit of 9 EB. But I could imagine that this could refer to a fs block size of 64; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00730.html (7,379 bytes)
18. Re: FS Limits (fwd) (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 10:46:25 +0200; I have some questions and am wondering if you could help me any further: it is stated that XFS has a file system size limit of 9 EB. But I could imagine that this could refer to a fs block size of 6; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00731.html (8,167 bytes)
19. Re: FS Limits (fwd) (score: 1): Author: Jan Derfinak <ja@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 12:09:12 +0200 (CEST); And what about LBD support in 2.5.x kernels or LBD patches in ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/patches/weekly-snapshot-patch/ ? That should address 2TB limit or not? jan -- We've been walled-i; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00733.html (8,185 bytes)
20. Re: FS Limits (fwd) (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: 13 May 2003 11:15:30 -0500; Irix can do the insanely large sizes - although there are practical limitations which come into play before you can get there. We do have customers with filesystems on the order of 100 Tbytes in size; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00738.html (9,240 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]