Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*FAM\s+2\.7\.0\-pre2\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. FAM 2.7.0-pre2 (score: 1)
Author: Michael Raymond <mraymond@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 15:50:43 -0600
ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/fam/download/testing/fam-2.7.0-pre2.tar.gz I've updated the pre-release of 2.7 to build correctly on IRIX using the Freeware tools. Please try this out. If there's no objec
/archives/fam/2003-11/msg00010.html (7,693 bytes)

2. Re: FAM 2.7.0-pre2 (score: 1)
Author: Rolf Sponsel <Rolf.Sponsel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 23:37:49 +0100
Great to se that FAM is begining to come to life again! :-) A question though - what about the support for Solaris? I recall Stefan Teleman, elected maintainer of KDE for Solaris, having done some st
/archives/fam/2003-11/msg00011.html (11,723 bytes)

3. Re: FAM 2.7.0-pre2 (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Teleman <steleman@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 21:33:01 -0400
I emailed fam@xxxxxxxxxxx and michael.wardle@xxxxxxxxxx way back in July, but i never got an answer back ... so i didnt' know what to do about it. I do have my port for FAM 2.6.9 for SunOS 5.8 -- it
/archives/fam/2003-11/msg00012.html (13,870 bytes)

4. Re: FAM 2.7.0-pre2 (score: 1)
Author: Michael Raymond <mraymond@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 12:27:22 -0600
FAM has been idle for a long time so at this point I just want to push something out. As soon as that's done I plan on opening up CVS on SourceForge and will allow in things like Solaris support as w
/archives/fam/2003-11/msg00013.html (15,528 bytes)

5. Re: FAM 2.7.0-pre2 (score: 1)
Author: Ben <bench@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 11:04:07 -0800
well, if we're open to suggestions.... :) The biggest thing that's kept me from using FAM in the past has been the way FAM handles moves: it tells you a file was removed and another one was created,
/archives/fam/2003-11/msg00014.html (16,739 bytes)

6. Re: FAM 2.7.0-pre2 (score: 1)
Author: Alexander Larsson <alexl@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 24 Nov 2003 09:12:23 +0100
This isn't the fault of fam really. It depends on what information the kernel give you about changes. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Alexander Larsson Red
/archives/fam/2003-11/msg00015.html (9,148 bytes)

7. RE: FAM 2.7.0-pre2 (score: 1)
Author: "Viner, David" <dviner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 10:53:48 -0800
my completely unordered comments on releasing: - are there any regression tests for fam on any platforms? as we start to make more chages, it'd be awesome to know that we're not blowing away bits of
/archives/fam/2003-11/msg00016.html (15,777 bytes)

8. Re: FAM 2.7.0-pre2 (score: 1)
Author: Michael Raymond <mraymond@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 12:15:49 -0600
There are some tests including with fam but I don't know how good they are. I'm going to try to push out 2.7 this afternoon, or else do it on Monday. Next week I'll update the SourceForge CVS site an
/archives/fam/2003-11/msg00017.html (18,330 bytes)

9. Re: FAM 2.7.0-pre2 (score: 1)
Author: Joerg Wendland <joergland@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 19:41:17 +0100
Hi Michael, As soon as I finish the 2.7 Debian package I am willing to check in the patches for building that package. If you like I can simply send them to you for validation. My sf.net user name is
/archives/fam/2003-11/msg00018.html (9,089 bytes)

10. Re: FAM 2.7.0-pre2 (score: 1)
Author: Michael Raymond <mraymond@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 14:14:19 -0600
Sounds good. Send me a diff against 2.7 and I'll add you to the SF developer's list. Thanks, Michael -- Michael A. Raymond Office: (651) 683-3434 Core OS Scheduling Group Real-Time Lead
/archives/fam/2003-11/msg00020.html (9,378 bytes)

11. FAM 2.7.0-pre2 (score: 1)
Author: Michael Raymond <mraymond@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 15:50:43 -0600
ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/fam/download/testing/fam-2.7.0-pre2.tar.gz I've updated the pre-release of 2.7 to build correctly on IRIX using the Freeware tools. Please try this out. If there's no objec
/archives/fam/2003-11/msg00031.html (7,708 bytes)

12. Re: FAM 2.7.0-pre2 (score: 1)
Author: Rolf Sponsel <Rolf.Sponsel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 23:37:49 +0100
Great to se that FAM is begining to come to life again! :-) A question though - what about the support for Solaris? I recall Stefan Teleman, elected maintainer of KDE for Solaris, having done some st
/archives/fam/2003-11/msg00032.html (11,768 bytes)

13. Re: FAM 2.7.0-pre2 (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Teleman <steleman@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 21:33:01 -0400
Hi! I emailed fam@xxxxxxxxxxx and michael.wardle@xxxxxxxxxx way back in July, but i never got an answer back ... so i didnt' know what to do about it. I do have my port for FAM 2.6.9 for SunOS 5.8 --
/archives/fam/2003-11/msg00033.html (13,965 bytes)

14. Re: FAM 2.7.0-pre2 (score: 1)
Author: Michael Raymond <mraymond@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 12:27:22 -0600
FAM has been idle for a long time so at this point I just want to push something out. As soon as that's done I plan on opening up CVS on SourceForge and will allow in things like Solaris support as w
/archives/fam/2003-11/msg00034.html (15,712 bytes)

15. Re: FAM 2.7.0-pre2 (score: 1)
Author: Ben <bench@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 11:04:07 -0800
well, if we're open to suggestions.... :) The biggest thing that's kept me from using FAM in the past has been the way FAM handles moves: it tells you a file was removed and another one was created,
/archives/fam/2003-11/msg00035.html (16,904 bytes)

16. Re: FAM 2.7.0-pre2 (score: 1)
Author: Alexander Larsson <alexl@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 24 Nov 2003 09:12:23 +0100
This isn't the fault of fam really. It depends on what information the kernel give you about changes. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Alexander Larsson Red
/archives/fam/2003-11/msg00036.html (9,390 bytes)

17. RE: FAM 2.7.0-pre2 (score: 1)
Author: "Viner, David" <dviner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 10:53:48 -0800
my completely unordered comments on releasing: - are there any regression tests for fam on any platforms? as we start to make more chages, it'd be awesome to know that we're not blowing away bits of
/archives/fam/2003-11/msg00037.html (15,822 bytes)

18. Re: FAM 2.7.0-pre2 (score: 1)
Author: Michael Raymond <mraymond@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 12:15:49 -0600
There are some tests including with fam but I don't know how good they are. I'm going to try to push out 2.7 this afternoon, or else do it on Monday. Next week I'll update the SourceForge CVS site an
/archives/fam/2003-11/msg00038.html (18,513 bytes)

19. Re: FAM 2.7.0-pre2 (score: 1)
Author: Joerg Wendland <joergland@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 19:41:17 +0100
Hi Michael, As soon as I finish the 2.7 Debian package I am willing to check in the patches for building that package. If you like I can simply send them to you for validation. My sf.net user name is
/archives/fam/2003-11/msg00039.html (9,193 bytes)

20. Re: FAM 2.7.0-pre2 (score: 1)
Author: Michael Raymond <mraymond@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 14:14:19 -0600
Sounds good. Send me a diff against 2.7 and I'll add you to the SF developer's list. Thanks, Michael -- Michael A. Raymond Office: (651) 683-3434 Core OS Scheduling Group Real-Time Lead
/archives/fam/2003-11/msg00041.html (9,559 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu