Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Everyone\'s\s+favorite\s+offtopic\s+topic\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Everyone\'s\s+favorite\s+offtopic\s+topic\s*$/: 45 ]

Total 45 documents matching your query.

1. Everyone's favorite offtopic topic (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 23:16:25 -0400; A number of times, questions have popped up on this list about building really large arrays of IDE disks. Does anybody know if there's a list dedicated to that? If not, does anybody have suggestions; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01225.html (8,620 bytes)
2. Re: Everyone's favorite offtopic topic (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 12:23:36 +0200; A number of times, questions have popped up on this list about building really large arrays of IDE disks. Does anybody know if there's a list dedicated to that? If not, does anybody have suggestions; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01226.html (10,239 bytes)
3. Re[2]: Everyone's favorite offtopic topic (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 11:45:53 +0100 (BST); On Sun, 29 Jul 2001 12:23:36 +0200 Seth Mos <Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>> Only if specifcally configured to do so I believe. Mine have always come to auto spin-up on power-up and needed reconfigurin; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01228.html (9,058 bytes)
4. Re[2]: Everyone's favorite offtopic topic (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 13:10:51 +0200; Only if specifcally configured to do so I believe. Mine have always come to auto spin-up on power-up and needed reconfiguring (IBM Ultrastar etc). Depends on disk manufacturer. Most are default to s; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01230.html (9,770 bytes)
5. Re: Everyone's favorite offtopic topic (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 21:47:20 +1000 (EST); http://staff.sdsc.edu/its/terafile/ I was disapointed by this article. It was way more than $5k (probably that was Slashdot's mistake) which is to be expected for 16 disks I guess, however their perf; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01233.html (10,736 bytes)
6. Re: Everyone's favorite offtopic topic (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 15:02:43 +0200; IBM's SCSI disks usually have a jumper for that purpose (auto spin enable).; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01238.html (9,278 bytes)
7. Re: Everyone's favorite offtopic topic (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 20:43:52 +0200; http://staff.sdsc.edu/its/terafile/ I was disapointed by this article. It was way more than $5k (probably that was Slashdot's mistake) which is to be expected for 16 disks They had 3 different models; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01246.html (13,843 bytes)
8. Re: Everyone's favorite offtopic topic (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 23:46:22 +0200; I don't know one. I'm interested, I'm looking forward to do this myself in the near future. Best regards, Martin Stricker -- Homepage: http://www.martin-stricker.de/ Registered Linux user #210635: ht; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01251.html (9,300 bytes)
9. Re: Everyone's favorite offtopic topic (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 15:25:36 -0400; <snip> So... if I decide to get something like this set up... anybody know who might be willing to host such a mailing list? (Any chance that oss.sgi.com would? Or the ReiserFS folks?) Andrew Klaasse; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01269.html (9,579 bytes)
10. Re: Everyone's favorite offtopic topic (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 15:59:01 -0400; Since this is something I'm interested in too, and have a colocated machine capable of running mailman, I'd be willing to give it a shot as long as it doesn't turn into too high a traffic list, and n; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01270.html (10,988 bytes)
11. Re: Everyone's favorite offtopic topic (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 22:06:54 +0200; check out raidzone they have implemented NAS and SAN solutions based on ATA100 raid systems.. with a dedicated controller board....; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01271.html (9,809 bytes)
12. Re: Everyone's favorite offtopic topic (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: 30 Jul 2001 15:19:04 -0500; If you still need a list server, I've created linux-ide-arrays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx It's run by Majordomo; you can join the normal way or by sending an empty message to: - - linux-ide-arrays-subscribe; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01272.html (9,597 bytes)
13. Re: Everyone's favorite offtopic topic (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 16:36:11 -0400; Well... there we go. Sounds good. Thanks. Think we should let the Reiser people know, too? Anybody else? Andrew Klaassen; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01273.html (9,359 bytes)
14. Re: Everyone's favorite offtopic topic (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 23:33:05 +0200; Well... there we go. Sounds good. Thanks. Think we should let the Reiser people know, too? Anybody else? That is often used in the same setups as well. I'll cc their list. Note to the reiserfs folks:; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01274.html (10,115 bytes)
15. Re: Everyone's favorite offtopic topic (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 00:27:39 +0200; I'll post it to the mailing list for Red Hat Linux 7.1 and the Red Hat ext3fs-Mailing list. Sometimes this topic came up there, too. Best regards, Martin Stricker -- Homepage: http://www.martin-stric; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01275.html (8,890 bytes)
16. Everyone's favorite offtopic topic (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 23:16:25 -0400; A number of times, questions have popped up on this list about building really large arrays of IDE disks. Does anybody know if there's a list dedicated to that? If not, does anybody have suggestions; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02516.html (8,620 bytes)
17. Re: Everyone's favorite offtopic topic (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 12:23:36 +0200; A number of times, questions have popped up on this list about building really large arrays of IDE disks. Does anybody know if there's a list dedicated to that? If not, does anybody have suggestions; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02517.html (10,239 bytes)
18. Re[2]: Everyone's favorite offtopic topic (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 11:45:53 +0100 (BST); On Sun, 29 Jul 2001 12:23:36 +0200 Seth Mos <Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>> Only if specifcally configured to do so I believe. Mine have always come to auto spin-up on power-up and needed reconfigurin; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02519.html (9,058 bytes)
19. Re[2]: Everyone's favorite offtopic topic (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 13:10:51 +0200; Only if specifcally configured to do so I believe. Mine have always come to auto spin-up on power-up and needed reconfiguring (IBM Ultrastar etc). Depends on disk manufacturer. Most are default to s; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02521.html (9,770 bytes)
20. Re: Everyone's favorite offtopic topic (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 21:47:20 +1000 (EST); http://staff.sdsc.edu/its/terafile/ I was disapointed by this article. It was way more than $5k (probably that was Slashdot's mistake) which is to be expected for 16 disks I guess, however their perf; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02524.html (10,736 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]