Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Errr\.\.\.\s+what\'s\s+all\s+this\s+about\s+then\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Errr\.\.\.\s+what\'s\s+all\s+this\s+about\s+then\?\s*$/: 40 ]

Total 40 documents matching your query.

1. Errr... what's all this about then? (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 20:52:32 +1200; xfs_create looping, dir ino 0x40089, ino 0x4c240, ide0(3,7) xfs_create looping, dir ino 0x40089, ino 0x4c241, ide0(3,7) xfs_create looping, dir ino 0x140081, ino 0x14008d, ide0(3,7) xfs_create loopi; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01063.html (8,394 bytes)
2. Re: Errr... what's all this about then? (score: 1): Author: ord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 12:56:23 -0500; What were you doing when this happened? This comes from xfs_create() when xfs_dir_lookup() fails with ENOENT. I'll have to look more closely to see exactly what's going on... -Eric -- Eric Sandeen XF; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01094.html (8,489 bytes)
3. RE: Errr... what's all this about then? (score: 1): Author: 17@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 09:09:45 +1200; I don't know, to be honest. Looks like it might have happened at boot-up, as the entries are intertwined with the network card and parallel port ones: parport0: assign_addrs: aa5500ff(38) xfs_create; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01110.html (9,663 bytes)
4. RE: Errr... what's all this about then? (score: 1): Author: een@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 11:22:46 +1200; OK, this is what I did, and it's repeatable: service single start service single stop initscripts-5.83-1 I emptied dmesg with the -c flag... but as soon as I go into single mode and exit it, I get t; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01122.html (9,943 bytes)
5. RE: Errr... what's all this about then? (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 11:45:55 +1200 (NZST); No, not 'service single stop'... 'exit' I meant. ;-) -- Regards, Juha PGP fingerprint: B7E1 CC52 5FCA 9756 B502 10C8 4CD8 B066 12F3 9544; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01123.html (9,013 bytes)
6. Re: Errr... what's all this about then? (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 01:46:12 +0200; I made today a fresh installation on one system (sgi XFS 1.0 install CD). I just tried the gcc-2.96-81 for kernel again. I got an "Unknown Error 990" and boot failed because /var/run was corrupted a; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01124.html (9,906 bytes)
7. RE: Errr... what's all this about then? (score: 1): Author: z@xxxxxxxxxx; Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 15:30:53 +1200; OK, installed compat-egcs (plus a host of other RPMs required), and tried going into single mode and exiting it again. No problems this time. It seems that if you go into single mode on a system com; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01125.html (10,589 bytes)
8. Re: Errr... what's all this about then? (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 23:40:08 -0500 (CDT); I've had similar problems here. I have a Fujitsu 18Gig IDE drive that has two partitions on it (both XFS, one mounted ro and the other is my root partition) Anyway, I just updated to the latest cvs c; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01126.html (11,178 bytes)
9. Re: Errr... what's all this about then? (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 23:42:24 -0500 (CDT); BTW, using RedHat 7.1 with kgcc here! NOT gcc 2.96! -- Bruce Tenison btenison@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Public Key available at: http://www.keyserver.net; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01127.html (10,760 bytes)
10. RE: Errr... what's all this about then? (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 16:56:50 +1200; I was just about to post "edit your Makefile to use kgcc instead of gcc"... Recompiling the 2.4.4 XFS kernel with kgcc seems to have solved the fs corruption issues for me. -- Juha; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01128.html (9,539 bytes)
11. RE: Errr... what's all this about then? (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 07:48:46 -0500 (CDT); Strange... Wish I could say the same here. I've also tried a couple of different Chipsets. The main location that the drive will be housed is using a Promise ATA66 PCI card controller, and I'm curren; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01138.html (9,961 bytes)
12. Re: Errr... what's all this about then? (score: 1): Author: ord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 08:56:22 -0500; Thanks you guys for working through this one, that code you managed to get into is for an old bug in xfs which was fixed years ago, you get into the create a new file path, but when you go try insert; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01140.html (11,785 bytes)
13. RE: Errr... what's all this about then? (score: 1): Author: ord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 09:47:07 +1200; That's what we've got in common -- the VIA chip set. Nothing but trouble with that, to be honest. Memory performance is slower than on 440BX chip sets (trying to work out how to tweak the PCI regist; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01159.html (9,730 bytes)
14. Re: Errr... what's all this about then? (score: 1): Author: th@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 10:30:44 -0500; Strange. I'm experiencing the same problem on a Promise PDC20262 controller card too! Another thing, is that I've never, well... mostly never ;) , experienced problems with other filesystems on eithe; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01167.html (10,674 bytes)
15. Re: Errr... what's all this about then? (score: 1): Author: th@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 16:42:19 -0700; Just wanted to chime in with a FWIW post :) I've also got a Promise PDC 20262 w/ an IBM Deskstar running in UDMA mode 4 w/ no problems whatsoever. Additionally a Maxtor Diamond Max connected to the; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01171.html (11,495 bytes)
16. RE: Errr... what's all this about then? (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 10:48:56 +1200; Try booting with noapic on the command line, to see if the problems go away. Never again VIA for me... -- Juha; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01173.html (9,008 bytes)
17. RE: Errr... what's all this about then? (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 11:44:28 +1200; Yep... you're using a BX440 motherboard. Bruce and I have VIA chip set ones. I really, really, really regret buying that Tyan motherboard. :-( -- Juha; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01174.html (9,087 bytes)
18. Re: Errr... what's all this about then? (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 21:14:05 -0500; I've done a bit more work on this today, and now have a drive that doesn't seem to generate the errors I was having. The solution for me seemed to be enabling devfs support. I already had it compiled; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01197.html (11,563 bytes)
19. RE: Errr... what's all this about then? (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 09:09:50 -0500; Whoops ;) Wanted to make sure I had all of the details *GRIN* I was just worrying about the umounts on shutdown or reboot. Seems like the scripts are getting their information from /proc/mounts and; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01206.html (9,606 bytes)
20. Re: Errr... what's all this about then? (score: 1): Author: een@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 21:47:06 -0500; <a lot> Hm, not sure about the devfs thing, sure seems like it would not be related, but... I must admit that I have not yet really looked into this one. Ack! Nice catch, I guess we should fix that u; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01210.html (9,897 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]