Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Enabling\s+lazy\s+counters\s+damages\s+filesystem\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Enabling\s+lazy\s+counters\s+damages\s+filesystem\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Enabling lazy counters damages filesystem (score: 1): Author: Marcin Mirosaw <marcin@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:34:25 +0200; Hello, Please look at this: meta-data=/dev/malowazne/test isize=256 agcount=4, agsize=524288 blks = sectsz=512 attr=2 data = bsize=4096 blocks=2097152, imaxpct=25 = sunit=0 swidth=0 blks naming =vers; /archives/xfs/2010-04/msg00396.html (10,730 bytes)
2. Re: Enabling lazy counters damages filesystem (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:40:08 -0500; ok, I guess that mechanism is not hitting both sb fields. Should be a trivial fix, something like below. -Eric diff --git a/repair/phase1.c b/repair/phase1.c index 618796e..dbfbc9b 100644 -- a/repair; /archives/xfs/2010-04/msg00398.html (9,383 bytes)
3. Re: Enabling lazy counters damages filesystem (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:04:47 +1000; .... This was fixed in 3.0.5, IIRC. Please upgrade. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; /archives/xfs/2010-04/msg00399.html (8,068 bytes)
4. Re: Enabling lazy counters damages filesystem (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:43:12 +1000; Actually, 3.1.0 was the first release with the fix to xfs_db that prevents this problem. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; /archives/xfs/2010-04/msg00405.html (9,452 bytes)
5. Re: Enabling lazy counters damages filesystem (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 20:51:30 -0500; ... not so sure: xfsprogs-3.1.1-7 meta-data=fsfile isize=256 agcount=4, agsize=655360 blks = sectsz=512 attr=2 data = bsize=4096 blocks=2621440, imaxpct=25 = sunit=0 swidth=0 blks naming =version 2 b; /archives/xfs/2010-04/msg00406.html (9,113 bytes)
6. Re: Enabling lazy counters damages filesystem (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 12:05:49 +1000; Yeah, you are right. I was thinking that xfs_db did the feature bit modifications, then repair just fixed up the accounting. but repair does both in this case. I should remember code that I wrote yea; /archives/xfs/2010-04/msg00407.html (8,861 bytes)
7. Re: Enabling lazy counters damages filesystem (score: 1): Author: Marcin Mirosaw <marcin@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:03:37 +0200; W dniu 29.04.2010 04:05, Dave Chinner pisze: Hi, Eric, Dave, thank you for quick replay and patch. Patch solves problem for me:) Regards! Marcin; /archives/xfs/2010-04/msg00413.html (9,277 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]