Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 1999 16:57:29 -0200 (EDT)
agreed seems fine to me, this way we save a byte for data packets (common case) and make the "prepare for future retransmition" (when we have to do a skb_push(skb, 1) just to put the control byte bac
Arnaldo> cool, I was trying just to hack the X.25 packet layer to Arnaldo> make it work without that much changes, but seems like Arnaldo> we'll get a cleaner hack... ;) Well, lets wait for comments
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 1999 16:57:29 -0200 (EDT)
agreed seems fine to me, this way we save a byte for data packets (common case) and make the "prepare for future retransmition" (when we have to do a skb_push(skb, 1) just to put the control byte bac
Arnaldo> cool, I was trying just to hack the X.25 packet layer to Arnaldo> make it work without that much changes, but seems like Arnaldo> we'll get a cleaner hack... ;) Well, lets wait for comments