Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Don\'t\s+allow\s+mapped\s+address\s+after\s+binding\s+to\s+ipv4\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Don\'t\s+allow\s+mapped\s+address\s+after\s+binding\s+to\s+ipv4\.\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Don't allow mapped address after binding to ipv4. (score: 1): Author: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2000 12:22:57 +0900; Hi forks, linux-2.2.16 and linux-2.4.0-test5 allow to let an application bind an inet6 socket sd6 to an address / a port that is already bound to inet socket sd4. For example, the 2nd step below shou; /archives/netdev/2000-08/msg00002.html (10,045 bytes)
2. Re: Don't allow mapped address after binding to ipv4. (score: 1): Author: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2000 19:38:04 +0400 (MSK DST); Yeah... Ugly. 8) But we have no choice. Thank you. Alexey; /archives/netdev/2000-08/msg00022.html (7,635 bytes)
3. Re: Don't allow mapped address after binding to ipv4. (score: 1): Author: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2000 18:40:20 +0100 (BST); Does this not leave us open to 'binding closer' type attacks like NFS packet theft ?; /archives/netdev/2000-08/msg00023.html (7,853 bytes)
4. Re: Don't allow mapped address after binding to ipv4. (score: 1): Author: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2000 22:26:43 +0400 (MSK DST); Seems, with this patch theft is impossible. Without this patch IPv6 can steal sockets used by IP, indeed. Test !sk2->rcv_saddr prevents binding to place used both by IPv6 and IP wildcard. The proble; /archives/netdev/2000-08/msg00024.html (8,488 bytes)
5. Don't allow mapped address after binding to ipv4. (score: 1): Author: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2000 12:22:57 +0900; Hi forks, linux-2.2.16 and linux-2.4.0-test5 allow to let an application bind an inet6 socket sd6 to an address / a port that is already bound to inet socket sd4. For example, the 2nd step below shou; /archives/netdev/2000-08/msg00131.html (10,060 bytes)
6. Re: Don't allow mapped address after binding to ipv4. (score: 1): Author: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2000 19:38:04 +0400 (MSK DST); Hello! Yeah... Ugly. 8) But we have no choice. Thank you. Alexey; /archives/netdev/2000-08/msg00151.html (7,667 bytes)
7. Re: Don't allow mapped address after binding to ipv4. (score: 1): Author: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2000 18:40:20 +0100 (BST); Does this not leave us open to 'binding closer' type attacks like NFS packet theft ?; /archives/netdev/2000-08/msg00152.html (7,924 bytes)
8. Re: Don't allow mapped address after binding to ipv4. (score: 1): Author: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2000 22:26:43 +0400 (MSK DST); Hello! Seems, with this patch theft is impossible. Without this patch IPv6 can steal sockets used by IP, indeed. Test !sk2->rcv_saddr prevents binding to place used both by IPv6 and IP wildcard. The; /archives/netdev/2000-08/msg00153.html (8,513 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]