Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Does\s+the\s+Linux\s+kernel\s+support\s+RFC\s+2292\s+Advanced\s+Socket\s+API\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Does\s+the\s+Linux\s+kernel\s+support\s+RFC\s+2292\s+Advanced\s+Socket\s+API\?\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Does the Linux kernel support RFC 2292 Advanced Socket API? (score: 1): Author: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2000 00:04:09 -0500; Does the Linux kernel and header files support the RFC 2292 Advanced Socket API? I posted the same question to the glibc mailing list, because the header files involved were <netinet/ip.h> and <neti; /archives/netdev/2000-02/msg00049.html (8,541 bytes)
2. Re: Does the Linux kernel support RFC 2292 Advanced Socket API? (score: 1): Author: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2000 18:24:22 +0300 (MSK); What's about kernel -- the answer is yes. What glibc folk did say your this? Kernel header files are in full order. Alexey Kuznetsov; /archives/netdev/2000-02/msg00054.html (8,290 bytes)
3. Re: Does the Linux kernel support RFC 2292 Advanced Socket API? (score: 1): Author: Guilhem Tardy <Guilhem.Tardy@xxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2000 10:47:25 -0500; You'll find some of those in include/linux/ipv6.h : IPV6_SRCRT_TYPE_0 struct ipv6_rt_hdr {}; struct rt0_hdr {}; struct ipv6hdr{}; -- Guilhem Tardy phone: (613) 993-8232 Network Systems and Technolog; /archives/netdev/2000-02/msg00055.html (8,578 bytes)
4. Re: Does the Linux kernel support RFC 2292 Advanced Socket API? (score: 1): Author: Yuji Sekiya <sekiya@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2000 20:38:16 -0800; Hello, Usually, Userland applications don't include <linux/ipv6.h> directry. AFAIK, glibc doesn't have such definitions. As Alexey said, Linux kernel implement RFC2292, but glibc doesn't yet. -- SEKI; /archives/netdev/2000-02/msg00065.html (8,939 bytes)
5. Re: Does the Linux kernel support RFC 2292 Advanced Socket API? (score: 1): Author: Philip Blundell <pb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2000 18:49:59 +0000; It was me. I looked for IPV6_RTHDR_LOOSE, struct ip6_rthdr and friends and couldn't find them. Perhaps I just didn't look carefully enough. Sorry. p.; /archives/netdev/2000-02/msg00069.html (8,580 bytes)
6. Re: Does the Linux kernel support RFC 2292 Advanced Socket API? (score: 1): Author: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2000 22:02:00 +0300 (MSK); Like all other structures. You searched in wrong place, cut-n-paste them from rfc, rather than from kernel source. BTW loose and strict rthdr flags do not exist. Adv. API rfc is older than IPv6 rfc; /archives/netdev/2000-02/msg00070.html (8,274 bytes)
7. Does the Linux kernel support RFC 2292 Advanced Socket API? (score: 1): Author: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2000 00:04:09 -0500; Hi, Does the Linux kernel and header files support the RFC 2292 Advanced Socket API? I posted the same question to the glibc mailing list, because the header files involved were <netinet/ip.h> and <n; /archives/netdev/2000-02/msg00220.html (8,586 bytes)
8. Re: Does the Linux kernel support RFC 2292 Advanced Socket API? (score: 1): Author: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2000 18:24:22 +0300 (MSK); Hello! What's about kernel -- the answer is yes. What glibc folk did say your this? Kernel header files are in full order. Alexey Kuznetsov; /archives/netdev/2000-02/msg00225.html (8,319 bytes)
9. Re: Does the Linux kernel support RFC 2292 Advanced Socket API? (score: 1): Author: Guilhem Tardy <Guilhem.Tardy@xxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2000 10:47:25 -0500; You'll find some of those in include/linux/ipv6.h : IPV6_SRCRT_TYPE_0 struct ipv6_rt_hdr {}; struct rt0_hdr {}; struct ipv6hdr{}; -- Guilhem Tardy phone: (613) 993-8232 Network Systems and Technolog; /archives/netdev/2000-02/msg00226.html (8,622 bytes)
10. Re: Does the Linux kernel support RFC 2292 Advanced Socket API? (score: 1): Author: Yuji Sekiya <sekiya@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2000 20:38:16 -0800; Hello, Usually, Userland applications don't include <linux/ipv6.h> directry. AFAIK, glibc doesn't have such definitions. As Alexey said, Linux kernel implement RFC2292, but glibc doesn't yet. -- SEKI; /archives/netdev/2000-02/msg00236.html (9,018 bytes)
11. Re: Does the Linux kernel support RFC 2292 Advanced Socket API? (score: 1): Author: Philip Blundell <pb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2000 18:49:59 +0000; It was me. I looked for IPV6_RTHDR_LOOSE, struct ip6_rthdr and friends and couldn't find them. Perhaps I just didn't look carefully enough. Sorry. p.; /archives/netdev/2000-02/msg00240.html (8,679 bytes)
12. Re: Does the Linux kernel support RFC 2292 Advanced Socket API? (score: 1): Author: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2000 22:02:00 +0300 (MSK); Hello! Like all other structures. You searched in wrong place, cut-n-paste them from rfc, rather than from kernel source. BTW loose and strict rthdr flags do not exist. Adv. API rfc is older than IPv; /archives/netdev/2000-02/msg00241.html (8,299 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]