Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Does\s+XFS\s+require\s+DevFs\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Does\s+XFS\s+require\s+DevFs\?\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. Does XFS require DevFs? (score: 1): Author: Joseph Fannin <jhf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 18:31:14 -0400; I've searched the archives but found no answer to this question: Does XFS require DevFS? Or can I build a kernel for my system (installed from the XFS RH7.1 .iso) that does not include devfs without; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00536.html (8,244 bytes)
2. Re: Does XFS require DevFs? (score: 1): Author: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 13:34:34 +1000; No. devfs is useful on large systems, the sort of systems that benefit from a decent filesystem like XFS but you can build and run XFS without devfs. Fails how? Details are required. Sounds like the; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00538.html (9,035 bytes)
3. Re: Does XFS require DevFs? (score: 1): Author: Joseph Fannin <jhf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 18:47:33 -0400; Grrr. My apologies -- looking over my previous message, I've been a bit ambiguous. It's the devel tree that is giving me oopsen and random seqfaults. The 1.0 release patches and the .src.rpm from the; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00539.html (7,872 bytes)
4. Re: Does XFS require DevFs? (score: 1): Author: michael <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 21:41:51 -0600; devfs is definitely not reuired--in fact, it's the 1st thing i disable through lilo since I have not spent the time to try to get it to work with any software or hardware RAID devices (by default, it; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00540.html (10,335 bytes)
5. Re: Does XFS require DevFs? (score: 1): Author: Juha Saarinen <juha@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 15:51:31 +1200 (NZST); No, AFAICT it doesn't require devfs. What sort of hardware do you have? -- Regards, Juha PGP fingerprint: B7E1 CC52 5FCA 9756 B502 10C8 4CD8 B066 12F3 9544 On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Joseph Fannin wrote:; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00542.html (9,290 bytes)
6. Re: Does XFS require DevFs? (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 09:23:45 +0200; Sounds like the build is doing something wrong. Or some of the hardware is failing. If you ran 2.2 kernels before you may be in for a suprise. 2.4 pushes harder against the hardware which will show o; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00546.html (10,334 bytes)
7. Re: Does XFS require DevFs? (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 09:48:41 +0200; At 21:41 14-6-2001 -0600, michael wrote: devfs is definitely not reuired--in fact, it's the 1st thing i disable through lilo since I have not spent the time to try to get it to work with any software; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00548.html (9,808 bytes)
8. Re: Does XFS require DevFs? (score: 1): Author: Joseph Fannin <jhf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 01:20:12 -0400; Thanks you everyone for your replies, and for putting up with my frustration. Now that I know that my problem wasn't a misconfiguration I have built two kernels now with xfs support -- v2.4.3 with th; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00551.html (9,606 bytes)
9. Re: Does XFS require DevFs? (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 12:24:40 +0200; Thanks you everyone for your replies, and for putting up with my frustration. Now that I know that my problem wasn't a misconfiguration I have built two kernels now with xfs support -- v2.4.3 with th; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00552.html (10,210 bytes)
10. Does XFS require DevFs? (score: 1): Author: Joseph Fannin <jhf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 18:31:14 -0400; I've searched the archives but found no answer to this question: Does XFS require DevFS? Or can I build a kernel for my system (installed from the XFS RH7.1 .iso) that does not include devfs without; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01706.html (8,244 bytes)
11. Re: Does XFS require DevFs? (score: 1): Author: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 13:34:34 +1000; No. devfs is useful on large systems, the sort of systems that benefit from a decent filesystem like XFS but you can build and run XFS without devfs. Fails how? Details are required. Sounds like the; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01708.html (9,035 bytes)
12. Re: Does XFS require DevFs? (score: 1): Author: Joseph Fannin <jhf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 18:47:33 -0400; Grrr. My apologies -- looking over my previous message, I've been a bit ambiguous. It's the devel tree that is giving me oopsen and random seqfaults. The 1.0 release patches and the .src.rpm from the; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01709.html (7,872 bytes)
13. Re: Does XFS require DevFs? (score: 1): Author: michael <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 21:41:51 -0600; devfs is definitely not reuired--in fact, it's the 1st thing i disable through lilo since I have not spent the time to try to get it to work with any software or hardware RAID devices (by default, it; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01710.html (10,335 bytes)
14. Re: Does XFS require DevFs? (score: 1): Author: Juha Saarinen <juha@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 15:51:31 +1200 (NZST); No, AFAICT it doesn't require devfs. What sort of hardware do you have? -- Regards, Juha PGP fingerprint: B7E1 CC52 5FCA 9756 B502 10C8 4CD8 B066 12F3 9544 On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Joseph Fannin wrote:; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01712.html (9,290 bytes)
15. Re: Does XFS require DevFs? (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 09:23:45 +0200; Sounds like the build is doing something wrong. Or some of the hardware is failing. If you ran 2.2 kernels before you may be in for a suprise. 2.4 pushes harder against the hardware which will show o; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01716.html (10,334 bytes)
16. Re: Does XFS require DevFs? (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 09:48:41 +0200; At 21:41 14-6-2001 -0600, michael wrote: devfs is definitely not reuired--in fact, it's the 1st thing i disable through lilo since I have not spent the time to try to get it to work with any software; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01718.html (9,808 bytes)
17. Re: Does XFS require DevFs? (score: 1): Author: Joseph Fannin <jhf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 01:20:12 -0400; Thanks you everyone for your replies, and for putting up with my frustration. Now that I know that my problem wasn't a misconfiguration I have built two kernels now with xfs support -- v2.4.3 with th; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01721.html (9,606 bytes)
18. Re: Does XFS require DevFs? (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 12:24:40 +0200; Thanks you everyone for your replies, and for putting up with my frustration. Now that I know that my problem wasn't a misconfiguration I have built two kernels now with xfs support -- v2.4.3 with th; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01722.html (10,210 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]