Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Does\s+XFS\s+prevent\s+disk\s+spindown\?\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Does XFS prevent disk spindown? (score: 1)
Author: Thor Kristoffersen <thorkr@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2008 16:01:28 +0200
(It looks like my reply never made it to the list so I'm trying again.) This is kernel version 2.6.24. More specifically it's a Debian kernel from package linux-image-2.6.24-1-686 (2.6.24-4). I put t
/archives/xfs/2008-04/msg00091.html (12,488 bytes)

2. Re: Does XFS prevent disk spindown? (score: 1)
Author: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 11:05:34 +1000
Thor Kristoffersen wrote: (It looks like my reply never made it to the list so I'm trying again.) Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: David Chinner wrote: On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 08:26:00PM +0
/archives/xfs/2008-04/msg00096.html (13,666 bytes)

3. nux kernel 2.6.24.4 (score: 1)
Author: Thor Kristoffersen <thorkr@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 22:33:19 +0200
am aware of the change regarding barrier/nobarrier in 2.6.17 and above. However, the performance hit I'm seeing is very severe and much worse than what I was seeing in 2.6.17 (bundled with latest
/archives/xfs/2008-04/msg00108.html (10,643 bytes)

4. sync_counters_flags (score: 1)
Author: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 07:58:55 +1000
is was sent out for review yesterday.... What's t
/archives/xfs/2008-04/msg00112.html (10,261 bytes)

5. _vname_t (score: 1)
Author: Thor Kristoffersen <thorkr@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 07:53:13 +0200
ntly I ran xfs_repair due to a firmware upgrade on an unmounted disk. The repair recovered the data but moved it to the lost+found directory. How do I recover file names and ownership? Thanks! Je
/archives/xfs/2008-04/msg00127.html (9,855 bytes)

6. turned mail: see transcript for details (score: 1)
Author: Thor Kristoffersen <thorkr@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2008 16:01:28 +0200
nction xfs_write_file does no longer exists, i think that the first comment doesn't even make sense, and that the second one is correct writing xfs_write instead of xfs_write_file. Attachment:
/archives/xfs/2008-04/msg00687.html (12,488 bytes)

7. ee space problem (score: 1)
Author: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 11:05:34 +1000
uszĂr Viktor DĂnes (hvd@xxxxxx) [20080406 18:09]: That's 0.292% of your filesystem free. Not much by any means. Peter -- .+'''+. .+'''+. .+'''+. .+'''+. .+'' Kelemen PĂter / \ / \ Peter.Kelemen@
/archives/xfs/2008-04/msg00692.html (13,666 bytes)

8. ion (score: 1)
Author: Thor Kristoffersen <thorkr@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 22:33:19 +0200
. Could probably be a separate patch. Otherwise this looks fine.
/archives/xfs/2008-04/msg00704.html (10,643 bytes)

9. smatches (score: 1)
Author: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 07:58:55 +1000
journal when there have been no updates t
/archives/xfs/2008-04/msg00708.html (10,261 bytes)

10. output (score: 1)
Author: Thor Kristoffersen <thorkr@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 07:53:13 +0200
houldn't have uninitialised variables in the golden output Kill the output of uninitialised values when punching a hole. This prevents the test from passing on just about everything. The f
/archives/xfs/2008-04/msg00723.html (9,855 bytes)

11. Safety Manager (score: 1)
Author: vd@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 20:26:00 +0200
com/Home-Garden/ANSI-2-Mesh-5-point-Breakaway-Vest-Pack-of-6/3024039/product.html?cid=54556&fp=F&siteID=ydmf4rFDNTw-Wfs4Xgx_xXbOs5g.HQQOEQ
/archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00382.html (7,228 bytes)

12. own? (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 10:30:05 +1000
in up again shortly afterwards. I used iostat to monitor disk accesses to a mounted partition (with noatime) in single user mode. Apparentl
/archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00384.html (8,057 bytes)

13. DQUOT_LOGRES() (score: 1)
Author: vd@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 01:00:13 -0500
xfs_disk_dquot_t) = 104 bytes, the overall addition to the reservations is minor considering: write: 109752 truncate: 223672 rename: 305976
/archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00388.html (11,095 bytes)

14. eir attr2 (score: 1)
Author: or Dénes <hvd@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 20:26:00 +0200
to change the default behavior... so this isn't only a bug w.r.t. bad_features2, is it. Thanks, -Eric
/archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00771.html (7,228 bytes)

15. ce problem (score: 1)
Author: oto <miken@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 10:30:05 +1000
/3024039/product.html?cid=54556&fp=F&siteID=ydmf4rFDNTw-Wfs4Xgx_xXbOs5g.HQQOEQ
/archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00773.html (8,057 bytes)

16. e space problem (score: 1)
Author: or Dénes <hvd@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 01:00:13 -0500
Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group
/archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00777.html (11,095 bytes)

17. Re: Does XFS prevent disk spindown? (score: 1)
Author: Thor Kristoffersen <thorkr@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2008 16:01:28 +0200
(It looks like my reply never made it to the list so I'm trying again.) This is kernel version 2.6.24. More specifically it's a Debian kernel from package linux-image-2.6.24-1-686 (2.6.24-4). I put t
/archives/xfs/2008-04/msg01283.html (12,752 bytes)

18. Re: Does XFS prevent disk spindown? (score: 1)
Author: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 11:05:34 +1000
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: David Chinner wrote: On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 08:26:00PM +0200, Thor Kristoffersen wrote: I've noticed that when I spin down XFS-mounted disks they spin up a
/archives/xfs/2008-04/msg01288.html (13,828 bytes)

19. Re: Does XFS prevent disk spindown? (score: 1)
Author: Thor Kristoffersen <thorkr@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 22:33:19 +0200
xfs_logprint produces output like the one shown below, so it does indeed look like it's writing to the journal. But why should it need to keep writing to the journal when there have been no updates t
/archives/xfs/2008-04/msg01300.html (10,927 bytes)

20. Re: Does XFS prevent disk spindown? (score: 1)
Author: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 07:58:55 +1000
Are you using lazy-count=1? (i.e. output of 'xfs_info <mtpt>', please). Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group
/archives/xfs/2008-04/msg01304.html (10,565 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu