Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Do\s+you\s+know\s+about\s+skb_header_pointer\(\)\s+\?\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Do you know about skb_header_pointer() ? (score: 1)
Author: a@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 11:44:01 +0200
/archives/netdev/2004-08/msg00489.html (11,205 bytes)

2. Re: Do you know about skb_header_pointer() ? (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 07:16:18 -0700
/archives/netdev/2004-08/msg00496.html (8,648 bytes)

3. Re: Do you know about skb_header_pointer() ? (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 07:17:50 -0700
/archives/netdev/2004-08/msg00497.html (8,655 bytes)

4. Re: Do you know about skb_header_pointer() ? (score: 1)
Author: avem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 18:55:21 +0200
/archives/netdev/2004-08/msg00505.html (10,843 bytes)

5. Re: Do you know about skb_header_pointer() ? (score: 1)
Author: er@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 19:00:40 +0200
/archives/netdev/2004-08/msg00506.html (11,028 bytes)

6. Re: Do you know about skb_header_pointer() ? (score: 1)
Author: orge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 10:27:53 -0700
/archives/netdev/2004-08/msg00508.html (9,052 bytes)

7. Re: Do you know about skb_header_pointer() ? (score: 1)
Author: Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 11:44:01 +0200
[Cc'ing davem] yes, David Miller did so. If I remember correctly, his reasoning for skb_header_pointer() was that even though we are not guaranteed a completely linear transport layer header, it does
/archives/netdev/2004-08/msg01380.html (11,349 bytes)

8. Re: Do you know about skb_header_pointer() ? (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 07:16:18 -0700
Thanks for letting me know about this after we agreed upon skb_header_pointer() (or somthing like it) at the networking conference _AND_ I did the full implementation for you Harald. Or did you just
/archives/netdev/2004-08/msg01387.html (8,763 bytes)

9. Re: Do you know about skb_header_pointer() ? (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 07:17:50 -0700
I totally disagree with this change. The goal was to eliminate any and all linearization done by any part of the networking, especially on output paths.
/archives/netdev/2004-08/msg01388.html (8,785 bytes)

10. Re: Do you know about skb_header_pointer() ? (score: 1)
Author: Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 18:55:21 +0200
No offence meant, Dave :) I am grateful that you did this work, please don't get me wrong. Yasuyiki's first implementation dates July 29th. The one that I'm referring to was a patch from August 8th.
/archives/netdev/2004-08/msg01396.html (11,018 bytes)

11. Re: Do you know about skb_header_pointer() ? (score: 1)
Author: Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 19:00:40 +0200
Ok, that's fine with me. Let's stay with the skb_header_pointer(), which by the way [as expected] is not visible on my profile runs. Still, I am curious to know if anyone on one of the Cc'ed mailingl
/archives/netdev/2004-08/msg01397.html (11,218 bytes)

12. Re: Do you know about skb_header_pointer() ? (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 10:27:53 -0700
A driver could do this, by putting all receive SKB data into pages. I am not aware of any that currently do this. Such a driver would have to be very careful, as things like the ethernet header parsi
/archives/netdev/2004-08/msg01399.html (9,233 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu