- 1. nup (score: 1)
- Author: Marcin Zieba <mzieba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 23:08:06 +0100
- Description: Text document
- /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00106.html (6,973 bytes)
- 2. ome (score: 1)
- Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 05 Feb 2002 16:45:27 -0600
- hi Marcin - Looks like you hit a couple of bugs. :) _something_ caused a forced shutdown on your filesystem, and there was a bug in xfs around Jan 3 which would write data to block zero after a force
- /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00107.html (8,902 bytes)
- 3. ??) (score: 1)
- Author: Jason White <jasonw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 12:30:26 +1100
- So, to summarize the current state of XFS, would I be correcting in saying the following? The data-corrupting bug (overwriting the first blocks of an XFS file system upon forced shutdown) has been fi
- /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00110.html (8,056 bytes)
- 4. ome (score: 1)
- Author: Marcin Zieba <marcin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 07:03:49 +0100
- Eric Sandeen wrote: _something_ caused a forced shutdown on your filesystem, and there was a bug in xfs around Jan 3 which would write data to block zero after a forced shutdown - and that's where y
- /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00111.html (8,310 bytes)
- 5. ort (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Eshleman <jce0@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 09:13:50 -0500
- Jason White wrote: So, to summarize the current state of XFS, would I be correcting in saying the following? The data-corrupting bug (overwriting the first blocks of an XFS file system upon forced sh
- /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00114.html (8,884 bytes)
- 6. cleanup (score: 1)
- Author: >
- Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 23:08:06 +0100
-
- /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00680.html (6,973 bytes)
- 7. , /home (score: 1)
- Author: >
- Date: 05 Feb 2002 16:45:27 -0600
-
- /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00681.html (8,902 bytes)
- 8. opic??) (score: 1)
- Author: >
- Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 12:30:26 +1100
-
- /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00684.html (8,056 bytes)
- 9. , /home (score: 1)
- Author: >
- Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 07:03:49 +0100
-
- /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00685.html (8,310 bytes)
- 10. support (score: 1)
- Author: >
- Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 09:13:50 -0500
-
- /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00688.html (8,884 bytes)
- 11. Disappearing /, /home (score: 1)
- Author: Marcin Zieba <mzieba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 23:08:06 +0100
- Attachment: Oopsy.mail Description: Text document
- /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01254.html (6,973 bytes)
- 12. Re: Disappearing /, /home (score: 1)
- Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 05 Feb 2002 16:45:27 -0600
- hi Marcin - Looks like you hit a couple of bugs. :) _something_ caused a forced shutdown on your filesystem, and there was a bug in xfs around Jan 3 which would write data to block zero after a force
- /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01255.html (8,975 bytes)
- 13. Re: Disappearing /, /home (score: 1)
- Author: Jason White <jasonw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 12:30:26 +1100
- So, to summarize the current state of XFS, would I be correcting in saying the following? The data-corrupting bug (overwriting the first blocks of an XFS file system upon forced shutdown) has been fi
- /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01258.html (8,149 bytes)
- 14. Re: Disappearing /, /home (score: 1)
- Author: Marcin Zieba <marcin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 07:03:49 +0100
- Hi, _something_ caused a forced shutdown on your filesystem, and there was a bug in xfs around Jan 3 which would write data to block zero after a forced shutdown - and that's where your superblock li
- /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01259.html (8,319 bytes)
- 15. Re: Disappearing /, /home (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Eshleman <jce0@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 09:13:50 -0500
- So, to summarize the current state of XFS, would I be correcting in saying the following? The data-corrupting bug (overwriting the first blocks of an XFS file system upon forced shutdown) has been f
- /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01262.html (8,867 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu