Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Differences\s+in\s+mkfs\.xfs\s+and\s+xfs

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Differences\s+in\s+mkfs\.xfs\s+and\s+xfs_info\s+output\.\s*$/: 66 ]

Total 66 documents matching your query.

61. Re: Differences in mkfs.xfs and xfs_info output. (score: 1): Author: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:20:59 +1100; The output I showed you was from an ia64 machine, so it's not purely 64bit related. Can you rebuild you x86_64 kernel from the same kernel tree you built the ia32 (make mrproper; make ....) and reins; /archives/xfs/2008-02/msg01031.html (11,650 bytes)
62. Re: Differences in mkfs.xfs and xfs_info output. (score: 1): Author: Jan Derfinak <ja@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 02:20:42 +0100 (CET); Done, but the problem still exists. sb_fdblocks 253756, counted 254780 Dave, when you tested on ia64, did you use mkfs.xfs which wrote feature2 record on right place or did you use your patch to corr; /archives/xfs/2008-02/msg01033.html (11,182 bytes)
63. Re: Differences in mkfs.xfs and xfs_info output. (score: 1): Author: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:46:19 +1100; I did not use a patched mkfs - just my patch that does correction. I think I need to test this on an x86_64 box and see if i can reproduce it locally because it's not obviously operator error or clea; /archives/xfs/2008-02/msg01035.html (11,918 bytes)
64. Re: Differences in mkfs.xfs and xfs_info output. (score: 1): Author: Jan Derfinak <ja@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 03:10:19 +0100 (CET); Ok. Will you have possibility to test it in near future or should I rather recreate my FS's with lazy-count=0 to keep the data safe? Maybe this information can be useful. Kernel and userspace tools w; /archives/xfs/2008-02/msg01037.html (11,840 bytes)
65. Re: Differences in mkfs.xfs and xfs_info output. (score: 1): Author: Jan Derfinak <ja@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:05:32 +0100 (CET); I tried with only your patch. The result is slightly different, but not correct. meta-data=/dev/loop0 isize=256 agcount=4, agsize=64000 blks = sectsz=512 attr=2 data = bsize=4096 blocks=256000, imaxp; /archives/xfs/2008-02/msg01046.html (11,534 bytes)
66. Re: Differences in mkfs.xfs and xfs_info output. (score: 1): Author: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:42:16 +1100; Ok, still 1024 blocks out. Still need to reproduce it locally. FYI - thisis not a corruption bug - just an accounting problem. IOWs, all it will cause is slightly premature detection of ENOSPC.... Ch; /archives/xfs/2008-02/msg01058.html (11,230 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 66
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]