Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Daily\s+XFS\s+CVS\s+RPMS\s*$/: 44 ]

Total 44 documents matching your query.

1. Daily XFS CVS RPMS (score: 1)
Author: Andy Kwong <iserlohn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 19 Oct 2001 11:31:16 -0700
Since Alan Eldridge has left Linux for FreeBSD, he has left behind a great RPM CVS kit that I have been playing around with for the last few weeks. Right now I am building CVS RPMS regularly with pre
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00678.html (7,626 bytes)

2. Re: Daily XFS CVS RPMS (score: 1)
Author: Bryan-TheBS-Smith <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 14:38:36 -0400
Weekly check-out and builds of the "beta" tree would probably be best for most of us. -- TheBS -- Bryan "TheBS" Smith mailto:b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx chat:thebs413 Engineer AbsoluteValue Systems, Inc. http
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00679.html (8,759 bytes)

3. Re: Daily XFS CVS RPMS (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 14:38:52 -0500
Hi Bryan - What's "the 'beta' tree?" -Eric -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs sandeen@xxxxxxx SGI, Inc.
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00681.html (8,347 bytes)

4. Re: Daily XFS CVS RPMS (score: 1)
Author: Bryan-TheBS-Smith <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 16:22:09 -0400
According to Russel Ingram in the Linux+XFS HOWTO (dated 2001-10-18): "two distinct trees are available: o linux-2.4-xfs: fast moving development tree o linux-2.4-xfs-beta: stable bug fix only tree"
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00682.html (9,474 bytes)

5. Re: Daily XFS CVS RPMS (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 15:23:21 -0500
I think the beta tree is really stable - it never moves! Steve
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00683.html (8,784 bytes)

6. Re: Daily XFS CVS RPMS (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 15:23:48 -0500
Ah, I hope not many people are using that, it hasn't been touched in months. :) That was a stopping-off place prior to 1.0, I think. I'll ask Russel to remove it from the HOWTO... Thanks, -Eric -- Er
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00685.html (9,537 bytes)

7. Re: Daily XFS CVS RPMS (score: 1)
Author: Bryan-TheBS-Smith <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 16:29:00 -0400
No, thank you for clarifying. -- TheBS -- Bryan "TheBS" Smith mailto:b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx chat:thebs413 Engineer AbsoluteValue Systems, Inc. http://www.linux-wlan.org President SmithConcepts, Inc. http
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00686.html (9,719 bytes)

8. Re: Daily XFS CVS RPMS (score: 1)
Author: Robin Humble <rjh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2001 08:14:15 +1000 (EST)
Whilst we're talking patches: I have a drm/agpgart patch that restores accelerated OpenGL to the XFree that comes with RedHat7.1. Somewhere along the line (>2.4.7?) the Linus kernel moved to too-new
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00689.html (9,140 bytes)

9. Re: Daily XFS CVS RPMS (score: 1)
Author: "D. Stimits" <stimits@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 16:29:11 -0600
I haven't tried the newer kernels, but I was under the impression that instead of altering the DRM, a choice was going to be presented to use either the 4.0.x XFree86 version or the 4.1.x XFree86 ver
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00690.html (9,793 bytes)

10. Re: Daily XFS CVS RPMS (score: 1)
Author: Robin Humble <rjh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2001 09:16:36 +1000 (EST)
The -ac kernels give you a choice, but the Linus kernels only give you the new DRM (agpgart) version which doesn't work with XFree 4.0.* and hence your tuxracer goes slow. At least mine certainly did
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00691.html (9,615 bytes)

11. Re: Daily XFS CVS RPMS (score: 1)
Author: "D. Stimits" <stimits@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 17:54:00 -0600
That sucks, I don't want to lose DRM if I multiboot between kernels that have 4.1.x and 4.0.x. Somehow I doubt running both versions is easy or reasonable. I wonder if NVidia has its DRM out yet for
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00692.html (10,663 bytes)

12. Re: Daily XFS CVS RPMS (score: 1)
Author: Nick (Gunnar) Bluth <bluth@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2001 12:13:10 +0200
Am Samstag, 20. Oktober 2001 01:16 schrieb Robin Humble: [bluth@linux bluth]$ cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Linux release 7.2 (Enigma) [bluth@linux bluth]$ xdpyinfo | head name of display: :0.0 ver
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00696.html (9,053 bytes)

13. Re: Daily XFS CVS RPMS (score: 1)
Author: Sebastian Dransfeld <sebastid@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2001 12:49:50 +0200 (CEST)
And Mandrake 8.1 seb
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00697.html (8,755 bytes)

14. Re: Daily XFS CVS RPMS (score: 1)
Author: "D. Stimits" <stimits@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2001 16:41:53 -0600
I should rephrase things. I'm am so dependent on OpenGL that without it, I would have to abandon all future software that breaks it. If this means XFS, or Redhat, or 2.4.x kernels over a certain rele
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00699.html (11,601 bytes)

15. Re: Daily XFS CVS RPMS (score: 1)
Author: Bryan-TheBS-Smith <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2001 20:49:48 -0400
Why not go nVidia then??? You can use both the kernel AGPgart as well as try the built-in one in the driver itself. I've run with it both ways on Intel, ViA, AMD _and_ SiS chips for both Intel and AM
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00700.html (10,263 bytes)

16. Re: Daily XFS CVS RPMS (score: 1)
Author: "D. Stimits" <stimits@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2001 20:41:20 -0600
I do use it. But I use it with XFree86 4.0.3. I was not aware of 4.1.x versions being available. And if available, it requires me to upgrade X11 4.1.x, which is not an easy task. This would also caus
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00701.html (11,468 bytes)

17. Re: Daily XFS CVS RPMS (score: 1)
Author: Nick (Gunnar) Bluth <bluth@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2001 01:44:07 +0200
Am Sonntag, 21. Oktober 2001 00:41 schrieb D. Stimits: Don't see your problem... NVidia doesn't use DRM at all, they use their own kernel driver (which I compiled yesterday for 2.4.12-ac3)... Nick --
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00703.html (10,044 bytes)

18. Re: Daily XFS CVS RPMS (score: 1)
Author: "D. Stimits" <stimits@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2001 21:50:31 -0600
I don't know if the NVidia stuff is merely binary-only, and follows DRM specs, or if it is both binary-only AND uses its own DRM infrastructure. DRM will not work with NVidia...I don't know, this is
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00705.html (10,681 bytes)

19. Re: Daily XFS CVS RPMS (score: 1)
Author: utz lehmann <xfs@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2001 14:07:27 +0200
Its (mostly) binary only and has its own kernelinterface (/dev/nvidia*). That is not true. You _dont_ need DRM support at all for the nvidia driver. utz
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00706.html (9,610 bytes)

20. Re: Daily XFS CVS RPMS (score: 1)
Author: "D. Stimits" <stimits@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2001 11:39:46 -0600
This would be welcome news for my machine with NVidia. I assume it is still possible to get hardware accel? On the other hand, how will this work on the machine with non-NVidia hardware...will it be
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00709.html (9,977 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu