Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Creation\s+time\s+in\s+XFS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Creation\s+time\s+in\s+XFS\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Creation time in XFS (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 01 Oct 2007 11:30:01 +0200; If you ever change the on disk format adding a file type similar to ext3 to directories could also greatly speed up find in many cases. I don't think it is at all currently: % gid i_crtime fs/udf/udf; /archives/xfs/2007-10/msg00002.html (8,667 bytes)
2. Re: Creation time in XFS (score: 1): Author: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 15:55:11 +1000; Andi Kleen wrote: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx> writes: No XFS does not support creation time. It just has the regular atime,mtime and ctime. There are no plans that I've heard to support it. Not muc; /archives/xfs/2007-10/msg00019.html (8,585 bytes)
3. Re: Creation time in XFS (score: 1): Author: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 19:25:10 +1000; Sure, but that's the directory structure, not inode structure. They have different versioning methods, and so can be modified independently. FWIW, I haven't forgotten abou thtis request, Andi ;) I'll; /archives/xfs/2007-10/msg00026.html (8,847 bytes)
4. Re: Creation time in XFS (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 10:38:22 +0100; Windows wants it, so I guess they added when they had to bump the inode version anyway in preparation of a user interface for samba. We probably should do the same for XFS when bumping the inode vers; /archives/xfs/2007-10/msg00029.html (8,276 bytes)
5. Re: Creation time in XFS (score: 1): Author: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 07:31:53 +1000; <groan> Can you point me to whatever list this was discussed on? This is exactly the sort of stuff that needs to be discussed on -fsdevel. Perhaps. I don't really like the idea of adding unused field; /archives/xfs/2007-10/msg00038.html (8,954 bytes)
6. Re: Creation time in XFS (score: 1): Author:; Date: 01 Oct 2007 11:30:01 +0200; If you ever change the on disk format adding a file type similar to ext3 to directories could also greatly speed up find in many cases. I don't think it is at all currently: % gid i_crtime fs/udf/udf; /archives/xfs/2007-10/msg00329.html (8,667 bytes)
7. Re: Creation time in XFS (score: 1): Author:; Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 15:55:11 +1000; Andi Kleen wrote: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx> writes: No XFS does not support creation time. It just has the regular atime,mtime and ctime. There are no plans that I've heard to support it. Not muc; /archives/xfs/2007-10/msg00346.html (8,585 bytes)
8. Re: Creation time in XFS (score: 1): Author:; Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 19:25:10 +1000; Sure, but that's the directory structure, not inode structure. They have different versioning methods, and so can be modified independently. FWIW, I haven't forgotten abou thtis request, Andi ;) I'll; /archives/xfs/2007-10/msg00353.html (8,847 bytes)
9. Re: Creation time in XFS (score: 1): Author:; Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 10:38:22 +0100; Windows wants it, so I guess they added when they had to bump the inode version anyway in preparation of a user interface for samba. We probably should do the same for XFS when bumping the inode vers; /archives/xfs/2007-10/msg00356.html (8,276 bytes)
10. Re: Creation time in XFS (score: 1): Author:; Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 07:31:53 +1000; <groan> Can you point me to whatever list this was discussed on? This is exactly the sort of stuff that needs to be discussed on -fsdevel. Perhaps. I don't really like the idea of adding unused field; /archives/xfs/2007-10/msg00365.html (8,954 bytes)
11. Creation time in XFS (score: 1): Author: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 21:24:37 +0200; s release; /archives/xfs/2007-09/msg00398.html (7,004 bytes)
12. Re: Creation time in XFS (score: 1): Author: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 10:44:12 +1000; 3e9c7f2ca; /archives/xfs/2007-09/msg00399.html (8,413 bytes)
13. Re: Creation time in XFS (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 21:59:35 -0500; e9c7f2cae; /archives/xfs/2007-09/msg00400.html (7,160 bytes)
14. Creation time in XFS (score: 1): Author: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 21:24:37 +0200; tact claims release; /archives/xfs/2007-09/msg00799.html (7,004 bytes)
15. Re: Creation time in XFS (score: 1): Author: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 10:44:12 +1000; f38359ea8b3e9c7f2ca; /archives/xfs/2007-09/msg00800.html (8,413 bytes)
16. Re: Creation time in XFS (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 21:59:35 -0500; 38359ea8b3e9c7f2cae; /archives/xfs/2007-09/msg00801.html (7,160 bytes)
17. Creation time in XFS (score: 1): Author: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 21:24:37 +0200; Hi! Does XFS support creation time too or are there plans to support it? Ext3 seems to do since 2.6.23: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=ef7f38359ea8b3e9c7f; /archives/xfs/2007-09/msg01200.html (7,049 bytes)
18. Re: Creation time in XFS (score: 1): Author: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 10:44:12 +1000; Does XFS support creation time too or are there plans to support it? Ext3 seems to do since 2.6.23: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=ef7f38359ea8b3e9c7f2cae; /archives/xfs/2007-09/msg01201.html (8,268 bytes)
19. Re: Creation time in XFS (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 21:59:35 -0500; well, that's ext4, not ext3, just FWIW. -Eric; /archives/xfs/2007-09/msg01202.html (7,241 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 19
Page: [1]