I have downloaded the following file ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/Release-1.2/installer/forRH8.0-SGI- XFS-1.2.0.iso Twice, burned two separate CD's, verified the media and have tried to ru
At 10:57 18-2-2003 -0500, Jenny Williams wrote: I have downloaded the following file kernel-2.4.18-18SGI_XFS-1.2.0 This sounds familiar. So far one other person with an athlon has seen the same issue
I think the athlon rpms are completely missing from the installer, but perhaps not missing from the list of files it wants to install. It will take a re-spin of the installer to fix this. -Eric
Might that re-spin be undertaken, or are you guys going to let it be the way it is? I figure that if the functionality changed from one iso image to the next it might be an issue for people. Please k
Oh, we'll probably get it worked out. I swore last time that I would not do another RH installer, but Russell was nice enough to step in and do it this time. :) It's just a matter of priorities and t
Thank you for the information. I'll keep my eyes peeled. --On Tuesday, February 18, 2003 1:43 PM -0600 Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> wrote: Oh, we'll probably get it worked out. I swore last time th
Oh, the other helpful thing would be to look at the other terminals (alt-f1,f2, etc) for any other error messages. I think that should work fine, as long as your system root is not on xfs. -Eric
Jenny Williams wrote: I have downloaded the following file ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/Release-1.2/installer/forRH8.0-SGI- XFS-1.2.0.iso Twice, burned two separate CD's, verified the medi
But there's no point in leaving a non-functional installer out there, so it'll probably get fixed up. The 1.2.0 installer has another bug: it prints a welcome message for 1.2pre1.
Eric Sandeen wrote: Oh, we'll probably get it worked out. I swore last time that I would not do another RH installer, but Russell was nice enough to step in and do it this time. :) It's just a matter
It's not that hard, once you've taken the time to figure things out. There were two bits of it, Anaconda modifications to support xfs, and creating the right build environment for the installer. You
Ok the installer iso has been respun the iso the athlon kernels. The acl-devel and attr-devel packages have also been updated to libacl-devel and libattr-devel. I have not tested this iso but hopeful
I've tried and it errored out when creating the filesystem citing a runtime error that /sbin/mkfs.xfs could not be used, I looked and there was no /sbin/mkfs.xfs. I'm looking at the Makefile now to t
Zitat von Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>: Hi Russel, I just tried this new installer: it fails making the filesystems, both in kickstart mode as well as in manual mode. anacdump.txt reads: R
I've tried the following: Upgrade 7.3/xfs 1.1 to 8.0/xfs 1.2 with the v.2 ISO image. Except for the question of whether I was building a new system or upgraded I chose all the default settings. This
Not sure what to say about that one... Yep, the old installer had code to say "the xfs disc" but I guess this was the quick-n-dirty spin, and it asks for "disc 6" (which really is what it is... just
Am Freitag, 21.02.03 um 01:17 Uhr schrieb Eric Sandeen: On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 10:24, Jenny Williams wrote: lilo did not run as part of the installation so the machine rebooted however it was using th
I have downloaded the following file ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/Release-1.2/installer/forRH8.0-SGI- XFS-1.2.0.iso Twice, burned two separate CD's, verified the media and have tried to ru
At 10:57 18-2-2003 -0500, Jenny Williams wrote: I have downloaded the following file kernel-2.4.18-18SGI_XFS-1.2.0 This sounds familiar. So far one other person with an athlon has seen the same issue
I think the athlon rpms are completely missing from the installer, but perhaps not missing from the list of files it wants to install. It will take a re-spin of the installer to fix this. -Eric