- 1. (score: 1)
- Author: myer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Oct 2002 12:21:18 -0600
- following file(s) were checked into: bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/slinx/2.4.x-xfs Modid: 2.4.x-xfs:slinx:131504a linux/fs/xfs/linux/xfs_aops.c - 1.12 - got a little carried away
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00718.html (13,793 bytes)
- 2. howto??? (score: 1)
- Author: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 18:49:22 +0000
- leshooting an email delivery issue for Bob. If necessary, Bob will confirm this. Thanks, Patrick Ballenger MCX Admin Volt Services @HP. -- Do you Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search new
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00719.html (8,465 bytes)
- 3. le - please reply. (score: 1)
- Author: eve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Oct 2002 12:51:48 -0600
- ge in dmesg about detecting possible stack I checked my kernel log, and found a lot of good info. It is attatched. I'm not sure if this is a pagebuf bug or what, but any help
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00721.html (8,303 bytes)
- 4. an anyone give me some diagnosis? (score: 1)
- Author: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 18:57:21 +0000
- at eats lots of stack. Please update to a resent XFS tree (like the ones in 2.4.20pre5aa and following). Also make sure you don't use a broken stack-eating storage driver lik
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00722.html (9,046 bytes)
- 5. an anyone give me some diagnosis? (score: 1)
- Author: wig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Oct 2002 12:58:58 -0600
- pecific parts of the xfs I/O path into a separate file, xfs_iomap.c out of xfs_lrw.c. Remove some parts of the code which were not doing anything for us. This is step one in
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00723.html (9,064 bytes)
- 6. nly device change remnants (score: 1)
- Author: ov <luben@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 02:59:13 +0100
- g. I did submit a patch. I did sumbit helpful to XFS improvement hints and suggestions. On whole I have had only 2 days of looking at the XFS code and thus I cannot be of an
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00740.html (9,006 bytes)
- 7. has complete history (score: 1)
- Author: angeli <andrea@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 03:01:28 +0100
- f you has actually said something that would suggest you know how to program we might have actually considered you a programmer. :-) (clever syntax a programmer does not mak
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00741.html (8,990 bytes)
- 8. csub() question (score: 1)
- Author: xxx>
- Date: 30 Oct 2002 12:21:18 -0600
-
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01497.html (13,793 bytes)
- 9. Hat 8.0 + 1.2pre2 (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 18:49:22 +0000
- hem the last two pagebuf changes to try in their tree. I suspect they were being bitten by at least one of them. Steve -- Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01498.html (8,465 bytes)
- 10. - fix loop termination logic in xfs_sync (score: 1)
- Author: g <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Oct 2002 12:51:48 -0600
- hecked into: bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/slinx/2.4.x-xfs Modid: 2.4.x-xfs:slinx:131504a linux/fs/xfs/linux/xfs_aops.c - 1.12 - got a little carried away
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01500.html (8,303 bytes)
- 11. c (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 18:57:21 +0000
- ery issue for Bob. If necessary, Bob will confirm this. Thanks, Patrick Ballenger MCX Admin Volt Services @HP. -- Do you Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search new
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01501.html (9,046 bytes)
- 12. k deadlock (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Oct 2002 12:58:58 -0600
- -ha team is having major problems with this kernel. It seems that the process scheduling is unreliable and that they can get deadtimes on their comm
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01502.html (9,064 bytes)
- 13. s (score: 1)
- Author: @xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 02:59:13 +0100
- rebuild --target i686 kernel-foo.src.rpm -Eric -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs sandeen@xxxxxxx SGI, Inc. 651-683-3102
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01519.html (9,006 bytes)
- 14. Question about kernel update (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 03:01:28 +0100
- the quota code, left over from the VFS_RDONLY toggling that was going on there. Remove a couple other readonly device change remnants The followin
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01520.html (8,990 bytes)
- 15. Can anyone give me some diagnosis? (score: 1)
- Author: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Oct 2002 12:21:18 -0600
- I've recently got a message in dmesg about detecting possible stack overflow. I checked my kernel log, and found a lot of good info. It is attatched. I'm not sure if this is a pagebuf bug or what, bu
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02276.html (13,793 bytes)
- 16. Re: Can anyone give me some diagnosis? (score: 1)
- Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 18:49:22 +0000
- 2.4.19-aa1 has XFS 1.1 that eats lots of stack. Please update to a resent XFS tree (like the ones in 2.4.20pre5aa and following). Also make sure you don't use a broken stack-eating storage driver lik
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02277.html (8,627 bytes)
- 17. Re: Can anyone give me some diagnosis? (score: 1)
- Author: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Oct 2002 12:51:48 -0600
- hrmm....that may be more difficult than it sounds...Is this error fatal? Is there something I can do to my 2.4.19-aa1, to just update the XFS code, so our codebase for our kernels can just be version
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02279.html (8,359 bytes)
- 18. Re: Can anyone give me some diagnosis? (score: 1)
- Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 18:57:21 +0000
- Yes, stackoverflows can cause random memory corruption. It's certainly possible, but you need to patch it in yourself :) Take 2.4.19-aa1, remove the 7* patches and try to fit in the XFS 1.2-pre2 or c
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02280.html (9,238 bytes)
- 19. Re: Can anyone give me some diagnosis? (score: 1)
- Author: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Oct 2002 12:58:58 -0600
- Hot damn. I'll try it. NP, not like I haven't done that before! :)
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02281.html (9,120 bytes)
- 20. Re: Can anyone give me some diagnosis? (score: 1)
- Author: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 02:59:13 +0100
- it's not fatal for sure, it's a warning, if you didn't notice anything wrong you can probably ignore it. I will release a new -aa for 2.4.20-rc1 in a few days, you may want to try again with such new
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02298.html (9,156 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu